Should europe tolerate islam?

I once read http://americanbikersunitedagainstj...mic-deceit-taqiyya-kitman-tawriya-muruna-etc/

And there are several opinions.

One of it that yes, it should.

Let the muslims believe whatever they want to believe. It's their right. France would stop becoming a free society if it starts meddling with others' people' opinion.

I partially agree with it.

The problem is, France, is a democratic country. The opinions of your fellow citizens will affect how you live.

Imagine if suddenly a large number of people wants to prohibit porn or to stone porn stars. It will be the law of the land.

Another issue is consistency. If germany or france tolerate islam, should they also tolerate nazism and white supremacism? Same logic. If you tolerate one and not the other, you're in the same shit.

What happens is we have an imbalanced secularism. A violent ideology end up being protected because their adherence simply complain too much about how they are being oppressed. A more moderate ideology, like capitalism, is freely attacked and ridiculed.

So what do you think?
The US Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, so Islam and sharia law should be allowed in the US, not just tolerated.

Islam isn't a 'religion', it's a political ideology. Almost none of the Koran is religious writings, it's about political conquests, looting, slavery, and mass murders of 'enemies', and how to rule over them, how to divide the spoils, etc. The U.S. Constitution in no way demands that Islam has to be tolerated.
 
I once read http://americanbikersunitedagainstj...mic-deceit-taqiyya-kitman-tawriya-muruna-etc/

And there are several opinions.

One of it that yes, it should.

Let the muslims believe whatever they want to believe. It's their right. France would stop becoming a free society if it starts meddling with others' people' opinion.

I partially agree with it.

The problem is, France, is a democratic country. The opinions of your fellow citizens will affect how you live.

Imagine if suddenly a large number of people wants to prohibit porn or to stone porn stars. It will be the law of the land.

Another issue is consistency. If germany or france tolerate islam, should they also tolerate nazism and white supremacism? Same logic. If you tolerate one and not the other, you're in the same shit.

What happens is we have an imbalanced secularism. A violent ideology end up being protected because their adherence simply complain too much about how they are being oppressed. A more moderate ideology, like capitalism, is freely attacked and ridiculed.

So what do you think?
The US Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, so Islam and sharia law should be allowed in the US, not just tolerated.

Islam isn't a 'religion', it's a political ideology. Almost none of the Koran is religious writings, it's about political conquests, looting, slavery, and mass murders of 'enemies', and how to rule over them, how to divide the spoils, etc. The U.S. Constitution in no way demands that Islam has to be tolerated.

Caution!
Beware of the US-American!
Weird!

 
Last edited:
I once read http://americanbikersunitedagainstj...mic-deceit-taqiyya-kitman-tawriya-muruna-etc/

And there are several opinions.

One of it that yes, it should.

Let the muslims believe whatever they want to believe. It's their right. France would stop becoming a free society if it starts meddling with others' people' opinion.

I partially agree with it.

The problem is, France, is a democratic country. The opinions of your fellow citizens will affect how you live.

Imagine if suddenly a large number of people wants to prohibit porn or to stone porn stars. It will be the law of the land.

Another issue is consistency. If germany or france tolerate islam, should they also tolerate nazism and white supremacism? Same logic. If you tolerate one and not the other, you're in the same shit.

What happens is we have an imbalanced secularism. A violent ideology end up being protected because their adherence simply complain too much about how they are being oppressed. A more moderate ideology, like capitalism, is freely attacked and ridiculed.

So what do you think?
The US Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, so Islam and sharia law should be allowed in the US, not just tolerated.

Islam isn't a 'religion', it's a political ideology. Almost none of the Koran is religious writings, it's about political conquests, looting, slavery, and mass murders of 'enemies', and how to rule over them, how to divide the spoils, etc. The U.S. Constitution in no way demands that Islam has to be tolerated.
You need to be less ignorant. Or is Zaan your mentor?
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^ Zaan is drinking early in the day. But then again, once Muslims are the majority in Europe, they'll be no more booze. So drink up! Prost!!

You use now the typical Commie-strategy. Nearly the same strategy use Nazis. This strategy will end with my death, because you (or one of your combatants) will kill me in the end, if your defamations will not be successful. A boring stupid form to "argue". Criminally.


WHOA!!! Go easy on the Schnapps!!


It's not my problem nor the problem of anyone else in the world, how you are able to justify your perverted form to live in the eyes of god. But let me tell you: There are other ways to live.


A real, caring god wouldn't have let the Holocaust happen.
 
I once read http://americanbikersunitedagainstj...mic-deceit-taqiyya-kitman-tawriya-muruna-etc/

And there are several opinions.

One of it that yes, it should.

Let the muslims believe whatever they want to believe. It's their right. France would stop becoming a free society if it starts meddling with others' people' opinion.

I partially agree with it.

The problem is, France, is a democratic country. The opinions of your fellow citizens will affect how you live.

Imagine if suddenly a large number of people wants to prohibit porn or to stone porn stars. It will be the law of the land.

Another issue is consistency. If germany or france tolerate islam, should they also tolerate nazism and white supremacism? Same logic. If you tolerate one and not the other, you're in the same shit.

What happens is we have an imbalanced secularism. A violent ideology end up being protected because their adherence simply complain too much about how they are being oppressed. A more moderate ideology, like capitalism, is freely attacked and ridiculed.

So what do you think?
The US Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, so Islam and sharia law should be allowed in the US, not just tolerated.

Islam isn't a 'religion', it's a political ideology. Almost none of the Koran is religious writings, it's about political conquests, looting, slavery, and mass murders of 'enemies', and how to rule over them, how to divide the spoils, etc. The U.S. Constitution in no way demands that Islam has to be tolerated.
You need to be less ignorant. Or is Zaan your mentor?

Go ahead and prove me wrong. you haven't read squat, just parroting some meme you think sounds 'tolerant n stuff', a typical fashion victim.
 
I once read http://americanbikersunitedagainstj...mic-deceit-taqiyya-kitman-tawriya-muruna-etc/

And there are several opinions.

One of it that yes, it should.

Let the muslims believe whatever they want to believe. It's their right. France would stop becoming a free society if it starts meddling with others' people' opinion.

I partially agree with it.

The problem is, France, is a democratic country. The opinions of your fellow citizens will affect how you live.

Imagine if suddenly a large number of people wants to prohibit porn or to stone porn stars. It will be the law of the land.

Another issue is consistency. If germany or france tolerate islam, should they also tolerate nazism and white supremacism? Same logic. If you tolerate one and not the other, you're in the same shit.

What happens is we have an imbalanced secularism. A violent ideology end up being protected because their adherence simply complain too much about how they are being oppressed. A more moderate ideology, like capitalism, is freely attacked and ridiculed.

So what do you think?
The US Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, so Islam and sharia law should be allowed in the US, not just tolerated.

Islam isn't a 'religion', it's a political ideology. Almost none of the Koran is religious writings, it's about political conquests, looting, slavery, and mass murders of 'enemies', and how to rule over them, how to divide the spoils, etc. The U.S. Constitution in no way demands that Islam has to be tolerated.

Caution!
Beware of the US-American!
Weird!



Pipe down, crank; you know even less than Taz does.
 
I once read http://americanbikersunitedagainstj...mic-deceit-taqiyya-kitman-tawriya-muruna-etc/

And there are several opinions.

One of it that yes, it should.

Let the muslims believe whatever they want to believe. It's their right. France would stop becoming a free society if it starts meddling with others' people' opinion.

I partially agree with it.

The problem is, France, is a democratic country. The opinions of your fellow citizens will affect how you live.

Imagine if suddenly a large number of people wants to prohibit porn or to stone porn stars. It will be the law of the land.

Another issue is consistency. If germany or france tolerate islam, should they also tolerate nazism and white supremacism? Same logic. If you tolerate one and not the other, you're in the same shit.

What happens is we have an imbalanced secularism. A violent ideology end up being protected because their adherence simply complain too much about how they are being oppressed. A more moderate ideology, like capitalism, is freely attacked and ridiculed.

So what do you think?
The US Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, so Islam and sharia law should be allowed in the US, not just tolerated.

Islam isn't a 'religion', it's a political ideology. Almost none of the Koran is religious writings, it's about political conquests, looting, slavery, and mass murders of 'enemies', and how to rule over them, how to divide the spoils, etc. The U.S. Constitution in no way demands that Islam has to be tolerated.
You need to be less ignorant. Or is Zaan your mentor?

Go ahead and prove me wrong. you haven't read squat, just parroting some meme you think sounds 'tolerant n stuff', a typical fashion victim.
Islam is a recognized religion the world over. You stand corrected.
 
Any free society is obliged to 'live and let live' regarding religions. When a religion has principles that are contrary to the rest of that society, intellectual campaigns pointing out differences and perceived errors should also be able to be presented. Society protecting a religion from criticism should not be tolerated.
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^ Zaan is drinking early in the day. But then again, once Muslims are the majority in Europe, they'll be no more booze. So drink up! Prost!!

You use now the typical Commie-strategy. Nearly the same strategy use Nazis. This strategy will end with my death, because you (or one of your combatants) will kill me in the end, if your defamations will not be successful. A boring stupid form to "argue". Criminally.


WHOA!!! Go easy on the Schnapps!!


It's not my problem nor the problem of anyone else in the world, how you are able to justify your perverted form to live in the eyes of god. But let me tell you: There are other ways to live.


A real, caring god wouldn't have let the Holocaust happen.


A real, caring god wouldn't had created an evil willing monster like you. But nevertheless you exist.



Von guten Mächten

Von guten Mächten treu und still umgeben,
Behütet und getröstet wunderbar,
So will ich diese Tage mit euch leben
Und mit euch gehen in ein neues Jahr.

Noch will das alte unsre Herzen quälen,

Noch drückt uns böser Tage schwere Last.
Ach, Herr, gib unsern aufgeschreckten Seelen
Das Heil, für das du uns geschaffen hast.

Und reichst du uns den schweren Kelch, den bittern

Des Leids, gefüllt bis an den höchsten Rand,
So nehmen wir ihn dankbar ohne Zittern
Aus deiner guten und geliebten Hand.

Doch willst du uns noch einmal Freude schenken
An dieser Welt und ihrer Sonne Glanz,
Dann wolln wir des Vergangenen gedenken
Und dann gehört dir unser Leben ganz.

Lass warm und hell die Kerzen heute flammen,

Die du in unsre Dunkelheit gebracht.
Führ, wenn es sein kann, wieder uns zusammen.
Wir wissen es, dein Licht scheint in der Nacht.

Wenn sich die Stille nun tief um uns breitet,

So lass uns hören jenen vollen Klang
Der Welt, die unsichtbar sich um uns weitet,
All deiner Kinder hohen Lobgesang.

Von guten Mächten wunderbar geborgen,

Erwarten wir getrost, was kommen mag.
Gott ist bei uns am Abend und am Morgen
Und ganz gewiss an jedem neuen Tag.


Dietrich Bonhoeffer
 
Last edited:
^^^^^^^^^^^^ Zaan is drinking early in the day. But then again, once Muslims are the majority in Europe, they'll be no more booze. So drink up! Prost!!

You use now the typical Commie-strategy. Nearly the same strategy use Nazis. This strategy will end with my death, because you (or one of your combatants) will kill me in the end, if your defamations will not be successful. A boring stupid form to "argue". Criminally.


WHOA!!! Go easy on the Schnapps!!


It's not my problem nor the problem of anyone else in the world, how you are able to justify your perverted form to live in the eyes of god. But let me tell you: There are other ways to live.


A real, caring god wouldn't have let the Holocaust happen.


A real, caring god wouldn't had created an evil willing monster like you. But nevertheless you exist.



Von guten Mächten

Von guten Mächten treu und still umgeben,
Behütet und getröstet wunderbar,
So will ich diese Tage mit euch leben
Und mit euch gehen in ein neues Jahr.

Noch will das alte unsre Herzen quälen,

Noch drückt uns böser Tage schwere Last.
Ach, Herr, gib unsern aufgeschreckten Seelen
Das Heil, für das du uns geschaffen hast.

Und reichst du uns den schweren Kelch, den bittern

Des Leids, gefüllt bis an den höchsten Rand,
So nehmen wir ihn dankbar ohne Zittern
Aus deiner guten und geliebten Hand.

Doch willst du uns noch einmal Freude schenken
An dieser Welt und ihrer Sonne Glanz,
Dann wolln wir des Vergangenen gedenken
Und dann gehört dir unser Leben ganz.

Lass warm und hell die Kerzen heute flammen,

Die du in unsre Dunkelheit gebracht.
Führ, wenn es sein kann, wieder uns zusammen.
Wir wissen es, dein Licht scheint in der Nacht.

Wenn sich die Stille nun tief um uns breitet,

So lass uns hören jenen vollen Klang
Der Welt, die unsichtbar sich um uns weitet,
All deiner Kinder hohen Lobgesang.

Von guten Mächten wunderbar geborgen,

Erwarten wir getrost, was kommen mag.
Gott ist bei uns am Abend und am Morgen
Und ganz gewiss an jedem neuen Tag.


Dietrich Bonhoeffer

So why did god create me?
 
You use now the typical Commie-strategy. Nearly the same strategy use Nazis. This strategy will end with my death, because you (or one of your combatants) will kill me in the end, if your defamations will not be successful. A boring stupid form to "argue". Criminally.


WHOA!!! Go easy on the Schnapps!!


It's not my problem nor the problem of anyone else in the world, how you are able to justify your perverted form to live in the eyes of god. But let me tell you: There are other ways to live.


A real, caring god wouldn't have let the Holocaust happen.


A real, caring god wouldn't had created an evil willing monster like you. But nevertheless you exist.



Von guten Mächten

Von guten Mächten treu und still umgeben,
Behütet und getröstet wunderbar,
So will ich diese Tage mit euch leben
Und mit euch gehen in ein neues Jahr.

Noch will das alte unsre Herzen quälen,

Noch drückt uns böser Tage schwere Last.
Ach, Herr, gib unsern aufgeschreckten Seelen
Das Heil, für das du uns geschaffen hast.

Und reichst du uns den schweren Kelch, den bittern

Des Leids, gefüllt bis an den höchsten Rand,
So nehmen wir ihn dankbar ohne Zittern
Aus deiner guten und geliebten Hand.

Doch willst du uns noch einmal Freude schenken
An dieser Welt und ihrer Sonne Glanz,
Dann wolln wir des Vergangenen gedenken
Und dann gehört dir unser Leben ganz.

Lass warm und hell die Kerzen heute flammen,

Die du in unsre Dunkelheit gebracht.
Führ, wenn es sein kann, wieder uns zusammen.
Wir wissen es, dein Licht scheint in der Nacht.

Wenn sich die Stille nun tief um uns breitet,

So lass uns hören jenen vollen Klang
Der Welt, die unsichtbar sich um uns weitet,
All deiner Kinder hohen Lobgesang.

Von guten Mächten wunderbar geborgen,

Erwarten wir getrost, was kommen mag.
Gott ist bei uns am Abend und am Morgen
Und ganz gewiss an jedem neuen Tag.


Dietrich Bonhoeffer

So why did god create me?


That's what only you are able to ask god.

 
WHOA!!! Go easy on the Schnapps!!

It's not my problem nor the problem of anyone else in the world, how you are able to justify your perverted form to live in the eyes of god. But let me tell you: There are other ways to live.


A real, caring god wouldn't have let the Holocaust happen.


A real, caring god wouldn't had created an evil willing monster like you. But nevertheless you exist.



Von guten Mächten

Von guten Mächten treu und still umgeben,
Behütet und getröstet wunderbar,
So will ich diese Tage mit euch leben
Und mit euch gehen in ein neues Jahr.

Noch will das alte unsre Herzen quälen,

Noch drückt uns böser Tage schwere Last.
Ach, Herr, gib unsern aufgeschreckten Seelen
Das Heil, für das du uns geschaffen hast.

Und reichst du uns den schweren Kelch, den bittern

Des Leids, gefüllt bis an den höchsten Rand,
So nehmen wir ihn dankbar ohne Zittern
Aus deiner guten und geliebten Hand.

Doch willst du uns noch einmal Freude schenken
An dieser Welt und ihrer Sonne Glanz,
Dann wolln wir des Vergangenen gedenken
Und dann gehört dir unser Leben ganz.

Lass warm und hell die Kerzen heute flammen,

Die du in unsre Dunkelheit gebracht.
Führ, wenn es sein kann, wieder uns zusammen.
Wir wissen es, dein Licht scheint in der Nacht.

Wenn sich die Stille nun tief um uns breitet,

So lass uns hören jenen vollen Klang
Der Welt, die unsichtbar sich um uns weitet,
All deiner Kinder hohen Lobgesang.

Von guten Mächten wunderbar geborgen,

Erwarten wir getrost, was kommen mag.
Gott ist bei uns am Abend und am Morgen
Und ganz gewiss an jedem neuen Tag.


Dietrich Bonhoeffer

So why did god create me?


That's what only you are able to ask god.


I bet god was having a bad day when he made Germany.
 
It's not my problem nor the problem of anyone else in the world, how you are able to justify your perverted form to live in the eyes of god. But let me tell you: There are other ways to live.


A real, caring god wouldn't have let the Holocaust happen.


A real, caring god wouldn't had created an evil willing monster like you. But nevertheless you exist.



Von guten Mächten

Von guten Mächten treu und still umgeben,
Behütet und getröstet wunderbar,
So will ich diese Tage mit euch leben
Und mit euch gehen in ein neues Jahr.

Noch will das alte unsre Herzen quälen,

Noch drückt uns böser Tage schwere Last.
Ach, Herr, gib unsern aufgeschreckten Seelen
Das Heil, für das du uns geschaffen hast.

Und reichst du uns den schweren Kelch, den bittern

Des Leids, gefüllt bis an den höchsten Rand,
So nehmen wir ihn dankbar ohne Zittern
Aus deiner guten und geliebten Hand.

Doch willst du uns noch einmal Freude schenken
An dieser Welt und ihrer Sonne Glanz,
Dann wolln wir des Vergangenen gedenken
Und dann gehört dir unser Leben ganz.

Lass warm und hell die Kerzen heute flammen,

Die du in unsre Dunkelheit gebracht.
Führ, wenn es sein kann, wieder uns zusammen.
Wir wissen es, dein Licht scheint in der Nacht.

Wenn sich die Stille nun tief um uns breitet,

So lass uns hören jenen vollen Klang
Der Welt, die unsichtbar sich um uns weitet,
All deiner Kinder hohen Lobgesang.

Von guten Mächten wunderbar geborgen,

Erwarten wir getrost, was kommen mag.
Gott ist bei uns am Abend und am Morgen
Und ganz gewiss an jedem neuen Tag.


Dietrich Bonhoeffer

So why did god create me?


That's what only you are able to ask god.


I bet god was having a bad day when he made Germany.


And while I stood there I saw more than I can tell and I understood more than I saw; for I was seeing in a sacred manner the shapes of all things in the spirit, and the shape of all shapes as they must live together like one being.

Black Elk


 
I am not advocating that islam is prohibited. My concern is either solutions make me feel problematic.

Let's compare islam, nazism, and drugs.

Do we consistently tell "live and let live"? No. I kind of live and let live reasoning. But if it's not consistent, what's the point?

Another solution is to clamp down on "violent beliefs". But that too will open up a lot of can
 
Any free society is obliged to 'live and let live' regarding religions. When a religion has principles that are contrary to the rest of that society, intellectual campaigns pointing out differences and perceived errors should also be able to be presented. Society protecting a religion from criticism should not be tolerated.



"NAMBLA" logic - an extreme absolutist position which demands that for logical consistencies sake that certain gross crimes be allowed, in order that no one might feel restrained.-Stirling S. Newberry-

A saner, more practical response is Jefferson's solution to such social problems:

Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.

Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

The Founders were quite fond of deportation.




 
Any free society is obliged to 'live and let live' regarding religions. When a religion has principles that are contrary to the rest of that society, intellectual campaigns pointing out differences and perceived errors should also be able to be presented. Society protecting a religion from criticism should not be tolerated.



"NAMBLA" logic - an extreme absolutist position which demands that for logical consistencies sake that certain gross crimes be allowed, in order that no one might feel restrained.-Stirling S. Newberry-

A saner, more practical response is Jefferson's solution to such social problems:

Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.

Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

The Founders were quite fond of deportation.

Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.

Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

I hope you can see that this man with the name "the society" alias "Thomas Jefferson" was a man who paved the way for everyone who displaces people. This sentence is criminal stupid. Racism pure. Fundamentalism pure. Contempt for mankind.

 
Last edited:
Any free society is obliged to 'live and let live' regarding religions. When a religion has principles that are contrary to the rest of that society, intellectual campaigns pointing out differences and perceived errors should also be able to be presented. Society protecting a religion from criticism should not be tolerated.



"NAMBLA" logic - an extreme absolutist position which demands that for logical consistencies sake that certain gross crimes be allowed, in order that no one might feel restrained.-Stirling S. Newberry-

A saner, more practical response is Jefferson's solution to such social problems:

Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.

Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

The Founders were quite fond of deportation.




Thomas Jefferson...he was a slaver owner right?
 
Any free society is obliged to 'live and let live' regarding religions. When a religion has principles that are contrary to the rest of that society, intellectual campaigns pointing out differences and perceived errors should also be able to be presented. Society protecting a religion from criticism should not be tolerated.



"NAMBLA" logic - an extreme absolutist position which demands that for logical consistencies sake that certain gross crimes be allowed, in order that no one might feel restrained.-Stirling S. Newberry-

A saner, more practical response is Jefferson's solution to such social problems:

Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.

Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

The Founders were quite fond of deportation.

Thomas Jefferson...he was a slaver owner right?

UInlike Muslim slavers, he never subjected hi male slaves to full frontal castration. If you think you can make a moral equivalency argument between Americans, where the importation of slaves outlawed within a mere decade or so after its founding, and gone in another 6 decades, with Islam's history, ore the treatment of them at any time, you will lose badly.

The Peanut Gallery can also note how few blacks there are in the ME today, after many centuries of trading in African slaves. That's because the Arabs murdered them all, and still do when they outlive their 'usefulness'.
 
Any free society is obliged to 'live and let live' regarding religions. When a religion has principles that are contrary to the rest of that society, intellectual campaigns pointing out differences and perceived errors should also be able to be presented. Society protecting a religion from criticism should not be tolerated.



"NAMBLA" logic - an extreme absolutist position which demands that for logical consistencies sake that certain gross crimes be allowed, in order that no one might feel restrained.-Stirling S. Newberry-

A saner, more practical response is Jefferson's solution to such social problems:

Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.

Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

The Founders were quite fond of deportation.

Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.

Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

I hope you can see that this man with the name "the society" alias "Thomas Jefferson" was a man who paved the way for everyone who displaces people. This sentence is criminal stupid. Racism pure. Fundamentalism pure. Contempt for mankind.

So go ahead and tell us all about what you would been if born in those days instead of the present: a Big Giant Social Justice Warrior, right? lol lol lol

And, we can note nobody can find anything wrong with that statement.

You're still a crank.
 

Forum List

Back
Top