- Feb 6, 2011
- 19,589
- 3,348
- 280
I think he's a progressive posing as a conservative.
They think this sort of stuff is funny.
Yep.. Wayyyy too obvious.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think he's a progressive posing as a conservative.
They think this sort of stuff is funny.
No, they should not. Government should not be involved in marriage at all.
When the state seeks to impose its will upon the churches of the land, bloodshed is a heartbeat away.
No. In our country, the state does not have the authority to dictate what the church must *allow*.
So if churches should be allowed refuse to marry homosexuals couples, should they be allowed to refuse to marry mixed race couples if it goes against their doctrine?
I think he's a progressive posing as a conservative.
They think this sort of stuff is funny.
Yep.. Wayyyy too obvious.
I think he's a progressive posing as a conservative.
They think this sort of stuff is funny.
You didn't answer the question. Should Churches be allowed to refuse to marry mixed race couples?When the state seeks to impose its will upon the churches of the land, bloodshed is a heartbeat away.
No. In our country, the state does not have the authority to dictate what the church must *allow*.
So if churches should be allowed refuse to marry homosexuals couples, should they be allowed to refuse to marry mixed race couples if it goes against their doctrine?
Race isn't comparable to sexuality. It's a forced comparison, one I don't choose to make, but there it is. Broken minds and/or dysfunctional sexuality especially is not comparable to race. A handicap like homosexuality isn't the same as an able bodied healthy heterosexual and hence, needs no protection under the constitution as a class of people that is protected and has civil rights. Actually, homosexuals have the same rights as anyone, period. Not more, and not less. THE SAME. But it's not enough, that tells you something right there.
You didn't answer the question. Should Churches be allowed to refuse to marry mixed race couples?So if churches should be allowed refuse to marry homosexuals couples, should they be allowed to refuse to marry mixed race couples if it goes against their doctrine?
Race isn't comparable to sexuality. It's a forced comparison, one I don't choose to make, but there it is. Broken minds and/or dysfunctional sexuality especially is not comparable to race. A handicap like homosexuality isn't the same as an able bodied healthy heterosexual and hence, needs no protection under the constitution as a class of people that is protected and has civil rights. Actually, homosexuals have the same rights as anyone, period. Not more, and not less. THE SAME. But it's not enough, that tells you something right there.
You can't pick and chose. Either you support government dictating to Churches or you don't. There is no middle ground, there is only one conservative answer.
You didn't answer the question. Should Churches be allowed to refuse to marry mixed race couples?So if churches should be allowed refuse to marry homosexuals couples, should they be allowed to refuse to marry mixed race couples if it goes against their doctrine?
Race isn't comparable to sexuality. It's a forced comparison, one I don't choose to make, but there it is. Broken minds and/or dysfunctional sexuality especially is not comparable to race. A handicap like homosexuality isn't the same as an able bodied healthy heterosexual and hence, needs no protection under the constitution as a class of people that is protected and has civil rights. Actually, homosexuals have the same rights as anyone, period. Not more, and not less. THE SAME. But it's not enough, that tells you something right there.
You can't pick and chose. Either you support government dictating to Churches or you don't. There is no middle ground, there is only one conservative answer.
When the state seeks to impose its will upon the churches of the land, bloodshed is a heartbeat away.
No. In our country, the state does not have the authority to dictate what the church must *allow*.
So if churches should be allowed refuse to marry homosexuals couples, should they be allowed to refuse to marry mixed race couples if it goes against their doctrine?
Race isn't comparable to sexuality. It's a forced comparison, one I don't choose to make, but there it is. Broken minds and/or dysfunctional sexuality especially is not comparable to race. A handicap like homosexuality isn't the same as an able bodied healthy heterosexual and hence, needs no protection under the constitution as a class of people that is protected and has civil rights. Actually, homosexuals have the same rights as anyone, period. Not more, and not less. THE SAME. But it's not enough, that tells you something right there.
I think he's a progressive posing as a conservative.
They think this sort of stuff is funny.
He sounds like Brave Sir Warbler, whom you adore.
This will be moot point in a few years as more and more churches find God again and become tolerant.
Those churches will not be Christian. There are many false churches that will gladly marry queers, but not a true Christian church.
I think he's a progressive posing as a conservative.
They think this sort of stuff is funny.
Yep.. Wayyyy too obvious.
Hate to break it to you, you aren't conservative, neither is the Republican party. Just because you oppose the 2% tax hikes of the democrats and support wars for Israel in the middle east, doesn't make you a conservative.
This will be moot point in a few years as more and more churches find God again and become tolerant.
Those churches will not be Christian. There are many false churches that will gladly marry queers, but not a true Christian church.
The fictional character, "Jesus"
If the authority empowered to "rent" out a church sign an agreement with a couple, they should honor the agreement regardless of their sexual orientation.
to be 'fair' and 'equal' i believe half your 'public talk' here should be left wing....and half right wing....
agreed...?
This will be moot point in a few years as more and more churches find God again and become tolerant.
Those churches will not be Christian. There are many false churches that will gladly marry queers, but not a true Christian church.
Actually, you mean just the opposite.
The fictional character, "Jesus" would not turn them away but fake christian churches would.
By the way, I notice that this thread started out asking if "churches should be forced" but now its changed to "allowed". Do the anti-Constitution RWs know the difference?
The holy writings and teachings of various religions do not condemn the color of a man's skin.The First Amendment forbids public law from forcing anything on religious institutions, just as it forbids religious institutions from imposing their will on the public.
So churches should have the right to discriminate against homosexuals?
How about against racial minorities as well?