Bush92
GHBush1992
- May 23, 2014
- 34,808
- 10,704
- 1,400
Judge tossed out bulk of case against Sheriff Joe! Good stuff!
Judge dismisses case against pardoned Arpaio
Judge dismisses case against pardoned Arpaio
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Judge tossed out bulk of case against Sheriff Joe! Good stuff!
Judge dismisses case against pardoned Arpaio
Somehow, I dont think that is happening.Poor Joe, now he can be put out to pasture..
No where else but in the political world can one break the law and get rewarded for it..Somehow, I dont think that is happening.Poor Joe, now he can be put out to pasture..
He is a nationwide personality now.
There usually isn't in a hearing sort of like a grand jury...Only a trial to see if he is guilty to stand trial...In which he was going for a jury trial until pardoned by Trump..Get it?There was no jury in the conviction of Sheriff Joe. So it was A witchhunt by politically correct shit stains....
Doesn't matter it was 100% a witchhunt, due to the timing of it - you know the election. Those that try to railroad him are politically correct shit stains and should be endlessly mocked for it.There usually isn't in a hearing sort of like a grand jury...Only a trial to see if he is guilty to stand trial...In which he was going for a jury trial until pardoned by Trump..Get it?There was no jury in the conviction of Sheriff Joe. So it was A witchhunt by politically correct shit stains....
Whatever, no worse than what the legal system does to ordinary citizens..Doesn't matter it was 100% a witchhunt, due to the timing of it - you know the election. Those that try to railroad him are politically correct shit stains and should be endlessly mocked for it.There usually isn't in a hearing sort of like a grand jury...Only a trial to see if he is guilty to stand trial...In which he was going for a jury trial until pardoned by Trump..Get it?There was no jury in the conviction of Sheriff Joe. So it was A witchhunt by politically correct shit stains....
Wrong is wrong no matter the personWhatever, no worse than what the legal system does to ordinary citizens..Doesn't matter it was 100% a witchhunt, due to the timing of it - you know the election. Those that try to railroad him are politically correct shit stains and should be endlessly mocked for it.There usually isn't in a hearing sort of like a grand jury...Only a trial to see if he is guilty to stand trial...In which he was going for a jury trial until pardoned by Trump..Get it?There was no jury in the conviction of Sheriff Joe. So it was A witchhunt by politically correct shit stains....
There usually isn't in a hearing sort of like a grand jury...There was no jury in the conviction of Sheriff Joe. So it was A witchhunt by politically correct shit stains....
No where else but in the political world can one break the law and get rewarded for it..Somehow, I dont think that is happening.Poor Joe, now he can be put out to pasture..
He is a nationwide personality now.
No where else but in the political world can one break the law and get rewarded for it..Somehow, I dont think that is happening.Poor Joe, now he can be put out to pasture..
He is a nationwide personality now.
Failure to repair doesn't require a jury...There usually isn't in a hearing sort of like a grand jury...There was no jury in the conviction of Sheriff Joe. So it was A witchhunt by politically correct shit stains....
Joe Arpaio - Wikipedia
On July 24, 2015, the court directed U.S. marshals to seize evidence, which was possibly related to the contempt of court charges and was slated for destruction, from the sheriff's office.[209]Dude, there was no jury, period.
On May 13, 2016, the court held Arpaio in contempt on three counts.[168] On August 19, 2016, the court asked the federal government to file criminal contempt charges against Arpaio and some of his subordinates over his failure to follow the court's instructions.[210] On October 11, 2016, federal prosecutors announced that they would press criminal contempt of court charges against Arpaio.[211] On October 25, 2016, such charges were officially filed, though Arpaio would not be arrested and no mugshot would be taken. The charges were filed just two weeks before an election in which Arpaio was running for re-election.[212]
On July 31, 2017, Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt of court. U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton wrote that Arpaio had "willfully violated an order of the court" by failing "to ensure his subordinates' compliance and by directing them to continue to detain persons for whom no criminal charges could be filed." Arpaio was scheduled to be sentenced in October 2017.
Get it?
We have a Constitutional right to trial by jury for serious crimes, usually involving anything that could land us in prison.Failure to repair doesn't require a jury...