Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,101
- 245
you are condemning the dead man without a trial?
Not at all, just admitting that, under the circumstances, the man who killed him is not guilty of murder. There is a difference.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you are condemning the dead man without a trial?
Liberals are more inclined to find that the father should not have killed his daughter's attacker. If she had been raped, she would have lived. The dead guy is dead. Didn't the father say that he didn't believe he killed the guy because he only hit him 4-5 times? They'll do an autopsy and perhaps find out what the cause of death was. The father's beating may just be a contributing factor. There's no way to know, now, whether the man has a history of child molestation.
Liberals are more inclined to find that the father should not have killed his daughter's attacker. If she had been raped, she would have lived. The dead guy is dead. Didn't the father say that he didn't believe he killed the guy because he only hit him 4-5 times? They'll do an autopsy and perhaps find out what the cause of death was. The father's beating may just be a contributing factor. There's no way to know, now, whether the man has a history of child molestation.
Liberals usually take the side of criminals. They don't like it when citizens defend themselves or others. In their minds people should just run away and call the police, even if their 5 year old daughter is being raped. Its just their mentality - let the state take care of everything.
okay you knuckle dragging idiots....you should not equate molesting a child with murdering a child...the fucking reason....cause it will make molester even more likely to kill the child since the punishment is the same....
When a young child has been molested.
In essence; they have been mentally murdered; and will be scared for life.
So to deprive the pedophile of his life is equal justice for the victim.
Should the father have left, called the police and waited for them to come and stop the rapist?
As the Sheriff said "This will go to a Texas prosecutor who may present it to a Texas grand jury and Texans will decide if this man should be prosecuted."
Which is pretty much Texas code for "he'll go free".
No, the father should have grabbed the bad guy, pulled him away from the girl and taken reasonable steps to detain him until the police could be called.
A bitch ass pussy like you might, but a real man wouldn't.
Listen up, morons. All I am saying here is that, while it was probably a natural reaction for pops to whack the molestor, he shouldn't have done it. Beat him up pretty bad - sure; the bastard deserved it. But you don't kill him.
OK?
Small Texas community stands by man who killed daughter's alleged abuser - CNN.com
i did not realize the father was 23.....that is the definite fight or flight mentality....and the community seems to be in support of the father.....
The dude was in the zone, straight kill mode. He did nothing wrong.
This also happened on their property. The father would of been justified on shooting the man dead since sexual assault/rape can be legally stopped by lethal force.
I see no difference in a man using his bare fists to stop the crime.
Its amazing to see what shitbags are defending the pedophile. Then again, I am not really that surprised...
no one is defending the pedophile...simply concerned with killing someone before the facts are determined...too much of that going about these days
Let's put it this way: a father saved his daughter from being raped and the pedophile died as a result of the confrontation.
And the last time I looked, our criminal justice system doesn't impose the death penalty for rape.