Sharia!

1.It’s the ‘constitution’ of Islam. And when a member of that movement is asked to decide whether they answer to our Constitution, or to sharia, we know whether we have a citizen of America, or a fifth columnist.


In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ we are not a theocracy, and that should be clear to all. The Constitution is the only law the people of the United States have agreed to be governed by.

“Now we are faced with the same kind of threat that has been seen in the past-a system of compulsory laws which has the use of force at its very core and which claims to emanate from God. It is called Sharia Law.
… concerned with the preeminent totalitarian threat of our time: the legal-political-military doctrine known within Islam as Shariah.” The U. S. Constitution and Sharia Law



But the elected leader of our nation won’t allow it to be accepted in our country……will they?


2.Don’t get your hopes up. Here is the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, papering the way for sharia in America:

“…on the whole and with legally imposed hard limitations, sharia courts, using Islamic law, can adapt to the American experience and become a part of the religious arbitration landscape of America.

Islamic courts are becoming common in North America. Muslims are building religious communities in America, and religious courts are part of the structure of many of these communities. These so-called sharia tribunals do what courts everywhere do: They provide a means for hearing and resolving disputes between members of their communities.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...america/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d3b0262ceb1f



3. And if you don’t agree, well….you’re bigoted, small-minded, Islamophobic, …and fearful.

“…of course, there are a lot of people who are just haters of all things Muslim,…”

Sounds a lot like the Muslim President… “they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment…”





4. While the Great Yogi made the point, “'It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future',” if we look to the UK, our sister nation,we may see the march of sharia into the public arena. In England, Islam has no intention of remaining either moderate, nor a minority.


Small pockets of Muslim-majority towns and communities demand that they be governed by sharia…..but with a far wider intention. Whether pursued through the violent form of jihad (holy war) or stealthier practices that shariah Islamists often refer to as "dawa" (the "call to Islam"), the aim is clear and evident in Britain.


And America?

That depends......


The american christian taliban really must envy those muslims.
The Taliban have a home in Pakistan..........they should stay there.

They decided to come her.......When becoming citizens they swear an oath to this country. We are nice to let them in, how about they respect the country they are moving too............We have laws..........we have culture...........It is not for us to bend to them but them to adapt to us.

Our culture is not compatible to Sharia Law. Don't like it. Don't move here.
 
1.It’s the ‘constitution’ of Islam. And when a member of that movement is asked to decide whether they answer to our Constitution, or to sharia, we know whether we have a citizen of America, or a fifth columnist.


In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ we are not a theocracy, and that should be clear to all. The Constitution is the only law the people of the United States have agreed to be governed by.

“Now we are faced with the same kind of threat that has been seen in the past-a system of compulsory laws which has the use of force at its very core and which claims to emanate from God. It is called Sharia Law.
… concerned with the preeminent totalitarian threat of our time: the legal-political-military doctrine known within Islam as Shariah.” The U. S. Constitution and Sharia Law



But the elected leader of our nation won’t allow it to be accepted in our country……will they?


2.Don’t get your hopes up. Here is the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, papering the way for sharia in America:

“…on the whole and with legally imposed hard limitations, sharia courts, using Islamic law, can adapt to the American experience and become a part of the religious arbitration landscape of America.

Islamic courts are becoming common in North America. Muslims are building religious communities in America, and religious courts are part of the structure of many of these communities. These so-called sharia tribunals do what courts everywhere do: They provide a means for hearing and resolving disputes between members of their communities.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...america/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d3b0262ceb1f



3. And if you don’t agree, well….you’re bigoted, small-minded, Islamophobic, …and fearful.

“…of course, there are a lot of people who are just haters of all things Muslim,…”

Sounds a lot like the Muslim President… “they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment…”





4. While the Great Yogi made the point, “'It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future',” if we look to the UK, our sister nation,we may see the march of sharia into the public arena. In England, Islam has no intention of remaining either moderate, nor a minority.


Small pockets of Muslim-majority towns and communities demand that they be governed by sharia…..but with a far wider intention. Whether pursued through the violent form of jihad (holy war) or stealthier practices that shariah Islamists often refer to as "dawa" (the "call to Islam"), the aim is clear and evident in Britain.


And America?

That depends......


The american christian taliban really must envy those muslims.



Yesterday you smeared the name of Senator Joseph McCarthy, claiming that he ruined countless innocent lives.

Yet when I challenged you to name any innocents whose lives were ruined.....you drew a blank.


Find any yet?
 
PC is on the bomb Iran train.




Show a little courage, Ang......

You brought up bombing Iran......how about an answer to my query????


C'mon out from under your desk, boooooyyyyyyyyyeeeeee.


Soooo predictable. :71::71::71:

Be very careful.....if this is the first time you've tried to think, you could be susceptible to an aneurysm.

If you're such a self-proclaimed genius, Twisted Sister, then surely you can answer this question. How do you know Russia hasn't already sold Iran some nuclear weapons ?

Putin Signs Bill To Formally Withdraw Russia From INF Treaty
 
Last edited:
PC is on the bomb Iran train.




Show a little courage, Ang......

You brought up bombing Iran......how about an answer to my query????


C'mon out from under your desk, boooooyyyyyyyyyeeeeee.




Can you find any post of mine demanding we bomb Iran.....or are you simply a bald-faced liar?
 
11. "LONDON -- Stoning for adultery. Amputations for theft. Death for apostates. And second-class status for Christians and Jews. This is life under Sharia law, the Islamic system practiced in countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Great Britain.

Yes, Great Britain.

There are reportedly some 85 Sharia courts now operating there, with Islamic judges ruling on cases ranging from financial to marital disputes among British Muslims.

"A woman's witness value is half that of a man," Craig told CBN News. "So [the courts] will tend, therefore, to take the man's position in a divorce." Islamic Sharia Law Comes to Great Britain - World - CBN News - Christian News 24-7 - CBN.com






Sharia, Koranic law, finding a home in our sister nation.


Will it be invited to stay here?



"In a decision that Muslim legal advocates celebrated as a major win, a [United States] federal appeals court on Tuesday agreed with a lower court that blocked an Oklahoma law that would have barred state courts from considering or using Shariah law — the Islamic code of conduct." Federal court deals blow to anti-Shariah efforts - U.S. News


Just one more reason why Liberals should never....never...be allowed in the seats of power in this nation.
 
1.It’s the ‘constitution’ of Islam. And when a member of that movement is asked to decide whether they answer to our Constitution, or to sharia, we know whether we have a citizen of America, or a fifth columnist.


In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ we are not a theocracy, and that should be clear to all. The Constitution is the only law the people of the United States have agreed to be governed by.

“Now we are faced with the same kind of threat that has been seen in the past-a system of compulsory laws which has the use of force at its very core and which claims to emanate from God. It is called Sharia Law.
… concerned with the preeminent totalitarian threat of our time: the legal-political-military doctrine known within Islam as Shariah.” The U. S. Constitution and Sharia Law



But the elected leader of our nation won’t allow it to be accepted in our country……will they?


2.Don’t get your hopes up. Here is the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, papering the way for sharia in America:

“…on the whole and with legally imposed hard limitations, sharia courts, using Islamic law, can adapt to the American experience and become a part of the religious arbitration landscape of America.

Islamic courts are becoming common in North America. Muslims are building religious communities in America, and religious courts are part of the structure of many of these communities. These so-called sharia tribunals do what courts everywhere do: They provide a means for hearing and resolving disputes between members of their communities.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...america/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d3b0262ceb1f



3. And if you don’t agree, well….you’re bigoted, small-minded, Islamophobic, …and fearful.

“…of course, there are a lot of people who are just haters of all things Muslim,…”

Sounds a lot like the Muslim President… “they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment…”





4. While the Great Yogi made the point, “'It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future',” if we look to the UK, our sister nation,we may see the march of sharia into the public arena. In England, Islam has no intention of remaining either moderate, nor a minority.


Small pockets of Muslim-majority towns and communities demand that they be governed by sharia…..but with a far wider intention. Whether pursued through the violent form of jihad (holy war) or stealthier practices that shariah Islamists often refer to as "dawa" (the "call to Islam"), the aim is clear and evident in Britain.


And America?

That depends......


The american christian taliban really must envy those muslims.



Yesterday you smeared the name of Senator Joseph McCarthy, claiming that he ruined countless innocent lives.

Yet when I challenged you to name any innocents whose lives were ruined.....you drew a blank.


Find any yet?


I gave you one in Anne Lee Moss.

but how about this...

After his censure, McCarthy continued senatorial duties for another two and a half years, but his career as a major public figure had been unmistakably ruined. His colleagues in the Senate avoided him; his speeches on the Senate floor were delivered to a near-empty chamber or were received with conspicuous displays of inattention. The press that had once recorded his every public statement now ignored him, and outside speaking engagements dwindled almost to nothing. President Eisenhower, finally freed of McCarthy's political intimidation, quipped to his Cabinet that McCarthyism was now "McCarthywasm"
 
This seems fun too.

"Joe Must Go" recall attempt
On March 18, 1954 Sauk-Prairie Star editor Leroy Gore of Sauk City, Wisconsin urged the recall of McCarthy in a front-page editorial that ran alongside a sample petition that readers could fill out and mail to the newspaper. A Republican and former McCarthy supporter, Gore cited the senator with subverting President Eisenhower's authority, disrespecting Wisconsin's own Gen. Ralph Wise Zwicker and ignoring the plight of Wisconsin dairy farmers faced with price-slashing surpluses.

Despite critics' claims that a recall attempt was foolhardy, the "Joe Must Go" movement caught fire and was backed by a diverse coalition including other Republican leaders, Democrats, businessmen, farmers and students. Wisconsin's constitutionstipulates the number of signatures needed to force a recall election must exceed one-quarter the number of voters in the most recent gubernatorial election, requiring the anti-McCarthy movement to gather some 404,000 signatures in sixty days. With little support from organized labor or the state Democratic Party, the roughly organized recall effort attracted national attention, particularly during the concurrent Army-McCarthy hearings.

Following the deadline of June 5, the final number of signatures was never determined because the petitions were sent out of state to avoid a subpoena from the Sauk County district attorney, an ardent McCarthy supporter who was investigating the leaders of the recall campaign on the grounds that they had violated Wisconsin's Corrupt Practices Act. Chicago newspapermen later tallied 335,000 names while another 50,000 were said to be hidden in Minneapolis, with other lists buried on Sauk County farms
 
“October 2005, the British home secretary Charles Clarke declared that: [T]here can be no negotiation about the suppression of equality between the sexes;

Do you have a problem with what Clarke said?

Islamists do.
Americans do too. The full text of the as-yet-to-be-ratified Equal Rights Amendment (ERA):
  • Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
  • Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
  • Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.
Equality of rights, unless you are a male, Christian, heterosexual, then you have no rights.
And your group has always been at the forefront of giving other groups equal rights. There's just no gratitude anymore.
 
1.It’s the ‘constitution’ of Islam. And when a member of that movement is asked to decide whether they answer to our Constitution, or to sharia, we know whether we have a citizen of America, or a fifth columnist.


In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ we are not a theocracy, and that should be clear to all. The Constitution is the only law the people of the United States have agreed to be governed by.

“Now we are faced with the same kind of threat that has been seen in the past-a system of compulsory laws which has the use of force at its very core and which claims to emanate from God. It is called Sharia Law.
… concerned with the preeminent totalitarian threat of our time: the legal-political-military doctrine known within Islam as Shariah.” The U. S. Constitution and Sharia Law



But the elected leader of our nation won’t allow it to be accepted in our country……will they?


2.Don’t get your hopes up. Here is the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, papering the way for sharia in America:

“…on the whole and with legally imposed hard limitations, sharia courts, using Islamic law, can adapt to the American experience and become a part of the religious arbitration landscape of America.

Islamic courts are becoming common in North America. Muslims are building religious communities in America, and religious courts are part of the structure of many of these communities. These so-called sharia tribunals do what courts everywhere do: They provide a means for hearing and resolving disputes between members of their communities.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...america/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d3b0262ceb1f



3. And if you don’t agree, well….you’re bigoted, small-minded, Islamophobic, …and fearful.

“…of course, there are a lot of people who are just haters of all things Muslim,…”

Sounds a lot like the Muslim President… “they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment…”





4. While the Great Yogi made the point, “'It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future',” if we look to the UK, our sister nation,we may see the march of sharia into the public arena. In England, Islam has no intention of remaining either moderate, nor a minority.


Small pockets of Muslim-majority towns and communities demand that they be governed by sharia…..but with a far wider intention. Whether pursued through the violent form of jihad (holy war) or stealthier practices that shariah Islamists often refer to as "dawa" (the "call to Islam"), the aim is clear and evident in Britain.


And America?

That depends......


The american christian taliban really must envy those muslims.



Yesterday you smeared the name of Senator Joseph McCarthy, claiming that he ruined countless innocent lives.

Yet when I challenged you to name any innocents whose lives were ruined.....you drew a blank.


Find any yet?


I gave you one in Anne Lee Moss.

but how about this...

After his censure, McCarthy continued senatorial duties for another two and a half years, but his career as a major public figure had been unmistakably ruined. His colleagues in the Senate avoided him; his speeches on the Senate floor were delivered to a near-empty chamber or were received with conspicuous displays of inattention. The press that had once recorded his every public statement now ignored him, and outside speaking engagements dwindled almost to nothing. President Eisenhower, finally freed of McCarthy's political intimidation, quipped to his Cabinet that McCarthyism was now "McCarthywasm"


You named Annie Lee Moss

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum


I showed she to be a card-carrying member of the communist party, with a job in the code room of the Pentagon. She never lost her job….so she was clearly not an innocent who was ruined by anyone, certainly not the American hero, McCarthy.


I said you'd lie about it again, as you are a low-life scummy Liberal.....and you just repeated it.




Yes....McCarty was crucified because he told the truth.

You inadvertently admitted it by being unable to find a single "innocent ruined by McCarthy."




While you're looking for any innocents ruined by McCarthy, maybe you can help OJ find the real killer.....
 
Move to our country then you need to respect our laws and our culture. We have a legal system here and not Sharia Law.

If you don't like the culture or our laws..........Then you shouldn't have came here.
I'm guessing you're not a Native American.
 
This seems fun too.

"Joe Must Go" recall attempt
On March 18, 1954 Sauk-Prairie Star editor Leroy Gore of Sauk City, Wisconsin urged the recall of McCarthy in a front-page editorial that ran alongside a sample petition that readers could fill out and mail to the newspaper. A Republican and former McCarthy supporter, Gore cited the senator with subverting President Eisenhower's authority, disrespecting Wisconsin's own Gen. Ralph Wise Zwicker and ignoring the plight of Wisconsin dairy farmers faced with price-slashing surpluses.

Despite critics' claims that a recall attempt was foolhardy, the "Joe Must Go" movement caught fire and was backed by a diverse coalition including other Republican leaders, Democrats, businessmen, farmers and students. Wisconsin's constitutionstipulates the number of signatures needed to force a recall election must exceed one-quarter the number of voters in the most recent gubernatorial election, requiring the anti-McCarthy movement to gather some 404,000 signatures in sixty days. With little support from organized labor or the state Democratic Party, the roughly organized recall effort attracted national attention, particularly during the concurrent Army-McCarthy hearings.

Following the deadline of June 5, the final number of signatures was never determined because the petitions were sent out of state to avoid a subpoena from the Sauk County district attorney, an ardent McCarthy supporter who was investigating the leaders of the recall campaign on the grounds that they had violated Wisconsin's Corrupt Practices Act. Chicago newspapermen later tallied 335,000 names while another 50,000 were said to be hidden in Minneapolis, with other lists buried on Sauk County farms



You claimed
“McCarthy was a horrible person who just set out to ruin innocent folks.

-- Tail Gunner Joe was a horrible man. He without any shred of evidence attacked/ruined the lives of countless people because he was drunk with political power.”

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum




Now you'd rather change the subject??????


Why is that?
 
Move to our country then you need to respect our laws and our culture. We have a legal system here and not Sharia Law.

If you don't like the culture or our laws..........Then you shouldn't have came here.
I'm guessing you're not a Native American.
Nope and let the Straw Mans begin..........

Sharia Law.........here...........NOPE
It's already here and has been for quite some time. How have you been affected?
 
PC should go to SA and study Sharia law.






What happened to your answer to the question??????



What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?


Sleazy little liars.....post and then run from the post

That would be you.
 
Move to our country then you need to respect our laws and our culture. We have a legal system here and not Sharia Law.

If you don't like the culture or our laws..........Then you shouldn't have came here.
I'm guessing you're not a Native American.
Nope and let the Straw Mans begin..........

Sharia Law.........here...........NOPE
It's already here and has been for quite some time. How have you been affected?
I haven't yet..........And never intend to let it.

They have gone mad in Europe over this BS..........You would notice if you brain hadn't turned to jelly.
 
Now she tries to insult me.
Who peed in her raisin bran this morning ?



Do you want to apologize for claiming that I want to bomb Iran?


You clearly can't answer the related question:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?
 
Move to our country then you need to respect our laws and our culture. We have a legal system here and not Sharia Law.

If you don't like the culture or our laws..........Then you shouldn't have came here.
I'm guessing you're not a Native American.
Nope and let the Straw Mans begin..........

Sharia Law.........here...........NOPE
It's already here and has been for quite some time. How have you been affected?
I haven't yet..........And never intend to let it.

They have gone mad in Europe over this BS..........You would notice if you brain hadn't turned to jelly.


Why would you think it 'turned'????

It started in that form.
 
Now she tries to insult me.
Who peed in her raisin bran this morning ?



Do you want to apologize for claiming that I want to bomb Iran?


You clearly can't answer the related question:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

It's not been proven either way on that. It's also untrue the claim Trump makes that Obama handed them $180 billion.
 

Forum List

Back
Top