Sharia!

[PoliticalChic]

You're 0 for 2...

I'm battin' 1.000


Watch my next homerun: you're a moron, the mental equivalent of a doggy chew-toy.

 

[Vastator]

You're 0 for 2...

I'm battin' 1.000


Watch my next homerun: you're a moron, the mental equivalent of a doggy chew-toy.

Yes, of course. Avoiding the content of a post, and instead limpwristedly attempting to attack the poster is a sure sign of a winning position. In Leftist echo chambers...

0 for 3...

 

[PoliticalChic]

9. An earlier poster predicted polygamy here…..it would be a sign.



More, throughout Europe.

“British websites: Azad Chaiwala, 33, owns two polygamous matchmaking sites: secondwife.com, which is exclusive to Muslims, and polygamy.com, open to everyone. His explicit goal is to spread the practice of multiple wives in the United Kingdom, despite the fact that it's in most cases against the law. (July 3, 2016)



Important harem developments: In "Polygamy: Europe's Hidden Statistic," Judith Bergmannotes some recent developments in Europe's acceptance of polygamy.

• Sweden's Center Party raised the idea of legalizing polygamy but then dropped the idea. But its youth division still advocates this change: "We think it is important for the individual to decide how many people he or she wants to marry."
• Likewise, the youth division of Denmark's Radical Left has proposed that polygamy be legalized.
• The number of European countries that recognize polygamous marriages when legally contracted abroad has grown and now includes the United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, and Sweden.
• It was estimated in 2012 that 30 percent of Arab men percent in Berlin had married more than one wife.
• Daham Al Hasan is making headlines in Denmark. Bergman explains: "He has twenty children with three wives, but two years ago fled alone from Syria to Denmark, and left his wives and children behind. Recently, under the Danish rules of family unification, one of his wives and eight of his children have joined him in Denmark. But Al Hasan wants all his children with him, as well as all his wives. He has been granted permission for nine additional children to join him, but as Denmark does not allow polygamy, the two remaining wives, under the same rules of family unification, are not permitted to join him. Lawyers, however, estimate that the remaining wives will also be able independently to join their children in Denmark." There's a shock in Denmark "not only because of the extraordinary size of the family, and what it will cost the Danish state just in child allowance, but because Al Hassan claims that he is too ill to work or even to learn Danish." In contrast, however, hardly anyone – and not a single Danish feminist – mentions that Al Hassan is a polygamist.
• In a television documentary, "Sharia in Denmark," several imams secretly recorded on camera endorsed polygamy.
• Tina Magaard did a study for the Danish Ministry of Welfare in 2012 in which she documented the extensive practice of polygamy among Danish Muslims.
• A 2013 German documentary found that "Muslim men used polygamy as a means to commit fraud and obtain more welfare benefits. The tactic was to have their wives claim at the Employment Center that they were single women who did not know the father of their children." Harems Accepted in the West

 

[PoliticalChic]

You're 0 for 2...

I'm battin' 1.000


Watch my next homerun: you're a moron, the mental equivalent of a doggy chew-toy.

Yes, of course. Avoiding the content of a post, and instead limpwristedly attempting to attack the poster is a sure sign of a winning position. In Leftist echo chambers...

0 for 3...

"...attempting to attack the poster..."


Welcome to the karma cafe....there are no menus but you will get what you deserve.




1. Not 'attempt,' .....accomplish.

2. You deserve it.

3. ... and I'm really good at it.

 

[Vastator]

You're 0 for 2...

I'm battin' 1.000


Watch my next homerun: you're a moron, the mental equivalent of a doggy chew-toy.

Yes, of course. Avoiding the content of a post, and instead limpwristedly attempting to attack the poster is a sure sign of a winning position. In Leftist echo chambers...

0 for 3...

"...attempting to attack the poster..."


Welcome to the karma cafe....there are no menus but you will get what you deserve.




1. Not 'attempt,' .....accomplish.

2. You deserve it.

3. ... and I'm really good at it.

0 for 4. Not quick enough on your feet to defend your own folly we see... Youre proof the left doesn’t have a monopoly on the mindless drone department...

 

[The Irish Ram]

Initially, Sharia law was applied discretely within the small Muslim enclaves of Europe. But after three generations of high birth rate and immigration into Europe, those enclaves have grown in size and number into "no go" zones (55 in Sweden alone) where Sharia law displaces civil law and has begun to challenge the Judeo-Christian foundation of their host European nations (see Spread of Islam).

Today, Sharia law is taking root in Germany, Sweden and other European nations that threw open their doors to Muslim refugees, who are forming "Sharia Police" (left, Wuppertal, Germany) to patrol, impose and enforce Sharia law on their host nations' streets.

We are next in line if the left removes our borders....

 

[Dogmaphobe]

We should not have parallel legal systems, especially inasmuch as one seeks to supplant the other.

Especially with one that requires submission to the Q'ran.

Yep

There is no reason to allow an aggressive cult to operate by its own rules.

What would be next - Scientology having its own courts?

 

[litman]

Na it won't be scientology it will be the o called Christian religion that seems to want religious laws taken from their interpretation of the Bible. How many different denominations of Christian are there. So we can plainly see that not all Christians agree. Actually very few agree. But this argument about Sharia law is just another diversion from what these idiots on the right are doing. The want a white only country. So the right will start this false bullshit in case that another black gets elected as president. They need falsehood to counter solid proposals from the left.

 

[Vastator]

Na it won't be scientology it will be the o called Christian religion that seems to want religious laws taken from their interpretation of the Bible. How many different denominations of Christian are there. So we can plainly see that not all Christians agree. Actually very few agree. But this argument about Sharia law is just another diversion from what these idiots on the right are doing. The want a white only country. So the right will start this false bullshit in case that another black gets elected as president. They need falsehood to counter solid proposals from the left.

At the rate currently; we’ll all be dead before we see a solid proposal from the Left...

 

[alang1216]

In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ we are not a theocracy, and that should be clear to all. The Constitution is the only law the people of the United States have agreed to be governed by.

We're 'one nation under God', doesn't that mean his laws take precedence?
We're endowed with 'inalienable rights' by God, doesn't that mean his rights take precedence?
There is a Religious Liberty movement in this country to overturn or prevent laws that conflict with religions.
Jews, based on the Bible, keep Kosher laws without violating the Constitution but they are instructed in that same Bible to stone adulterers to death, should they be prohibited from practicing any Jewish laws?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Na it won't be scientology it will be the o called Christian religion that seems to want religious laws taken from their interpretation of the Bible. How many different denominations of Christian are there. So we can plainly see that not all Christians agree. Actually very few agree. But this argument about Sharia law is just another diversion from what these idiots on the right are doing. The want a white only country. So the right will start this false bullshit in case that another black gets elected as president. They need falsehood to counter solid proposals from the left.

Can you back up anything you posted?

No?

Of course not.

So, you're another of those geniuses that government schooling turns out, huh?

 

[the other mike]

In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ ...

That's why we torture people in Cuba ?

 

[PoliticalChic]

In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ we are not a theocracy, and that should be clear to all. The Constitution is the only law the people of the United States have agreed to be governed by.

We're 'one nation under God', doesn't that mean his laws take precedence?
We're endowed with 'inalienable rights' by God, doesn't that mean his rights take precedence?
There is a Religious Liberty movement in this country to overturn or prevent laws that conflict with religions.
Jews, based on the Bible, keep Kosher laws without violating the Constitution but they are instructed in that same Bible to stone adulterers to death, should they be prohibited from practicing any Jewish laws?

How many times will imbecile....like you.....try to pretend that the religion on which this nation was built, the Judeo-Christian faith, .....is exactly the same as when the Bible was collated.....some three and a half millennia ago.


1.In a study of the historicity of Islam, several rather significant…and dramatic… issues stand out.

First, it is based on 7th century tribal aims, meaning the dominance of one’s tribe over all others.

Second, the design for domination is not to win over others by good works and good examples, but rather by murder and threats.

Third, and most essential in understanding the contemporary ramifications, unlike Judeo-Christian iterations, it has not undergone a reformation: these same doctrines apply for large segments of the Muslim ummah, community:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Kill those who insult Islam or the Prophet

C) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

H) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys




2. If we choose as a Litmus Test the sanctity of human life, then we find Islam, Marxism, Nazism, Progressivism, Liberalism, and every Democrat candidate for the presidency on the same side. Edwin Black in his book, “ The Farhud: The Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance in the Holocaust” points to the extermination of the Jews of Medina represents the iconic moment in Islam, just as the Sermon on the Mount is the iconic moment of Christianity, or the parting of the Red Sea is for the Jews.



3. “Christians and Jews....the more devout, the less violent. Not so with Islam.” Bill Donohue



Please don't waste space with another of your inane and fallacious posts.

 

[PoliticalChic]

In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ ...

That's why we torture people in Cuba ?

Let's check....

1. Guantanamo is the Carnival Cruise line of prison camps!
2. Needless to say, we pass out Korans to the little darlings to make sure they can stay up-to-date on their commitment to jihad. Giving Guantanamo detainees the Koran is like giving Jeffrey Dahmer “The Joy of Cooking.” Soon liberals will be recommending an audiobook version of the Koran read by Susan Sarandon or those who can’t reads but still want to hate the Jews.
3. In the interests of helping my country, I have devised a compact set of torture guidelines for Guantanamo. It’s not torture if:
   1. The same acts performed on a live stage have been favorably reviewed by Frank Rich on the New York Times.
   2. Andrew Sullivan has ever solicited it from total strangers on the Internet.
   3. You can pay someone in New York to do it to you.
   4. [Performance artist] Karen Finley ever got a federal grant to do it.
   5. It’s comparable to the treatment U.S. troops received in basic training.
   6. It’s no worse than the way airlines treat little girls in pigtails flying to see Grandma.
   7. The Washington Post reported that a detainee says he was “threatened with sexual abuse.” It’s not torture if it is similar to the way interns were treated in the Clinton White House.
4. One recent menu for suspected terrorists at Guantanamo consisted of orange glazed chicken, fresh fruit crepe, steamed peas and mushrooms, and rice pilaf. Sound like the sort of thing you’d get at Windows on the World- if it still existed.
5. On the bright side, at least liberals have finally found a group of people in Cuba whom they think deserve to be rescued. Coulter

Now answer my question: are you more a fool or more a liar?


I mean...today.

 

[Likkmee]

Any "law" gets met with a shotgun....Especially building inspectors.

 

[SavannahMann]

Well...if Muslims in America CHOOSE to be subject to Sharia law and Sharia courts, they are simply an overlay on the criminal justice system and the civil court system, not a substitute.

Say I have a disagreement (or a family dispute) with my neighbor about a business transaction, and we both agree to have it adjudicated by a Sharia judge. Who cares? If both parties are agreeable.

Unless their is a conflict - say w/r/t polygamy - who cares?

And the way our courts are going, polygamy will be "legal" here within a generation anyway.

Arbitration is a big business over here and cheaper than going to court.

Islamic Arbitration.

Murder of Lee Rigby - Wikipedia

So the attackers got life in prison? The maximum penalty under British law? And this is bad?

 

[the other mike]

Now answer my question: are you more a fool or more a liar?

I mean...today.

You're entire reply was an Ann Coulter quote and you think I'm the one
being foolish ?
Hey speaking of 'Carnival Cruises'....
Wanta ride in my new FEMA boat ?

 

[the other mike]

The shoe bomber has never come out of his cell here.
They have to force -feed many inmates here to keep them alive.
(Colorado)

 

[alang1216]

In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ we are not a theocracy, and that should be clear to all. The Constitution is the only law the people of the United States have agreed to be governed by.

We're 'one nation under God', doesn't that mean his laws take precedence?
We're endowed with 'inalienable rights' by God, doesn't that mean his rights take precedence?
There is a Religious Liberty movement in this country to overturn or prevent laws that conflict with religions.
Jews, based on the Bible, keep Kosher laws without violating the Constitution but they are instructed in that same Bible to stone adulterers to death, should they be prohibited from practicing any Jewish laws?

How many times will imbecile....like you.....try to pretend that the religion on which this nation was built, the Judeo-Christian faith, .....is exactly the same as when the Bible was collated.....some three and a half millennia ago.


1.In a study of the historicity of Islam, several rather significant…and dramatic… issues stand out.

First, it is based on 7th century tribal aims, meaning the dominance of one’s tribe over all others.

Second, the design for domination is not to win over others by good works and good examples, but rather by murder and threats.

Third, and most essential in understanding the contemporary ramifications, unlike Judeo-Christian iterations, it has not undergone a reformation: these same doctrines apply for large segments of the Muslim ummah, community:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Kill those who insult Islam or the Prophet

C) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

H) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys




2. If we choose as a Litmus Test the sanctity of human life, then we find Islam, Marxism, Nazism, Progressivism, Liberalism, and every Democrat candidate for the presidency on the same side. Edwin Black in his book, “ The Farhud: The Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance in the Holocaust” points to the extermination of the Jews of Medina represents the iconic moment in Islam, just as the Sermon on the Mount is the iconic moment of Christianity, or the parting of the Red Sea is for the Jews.



3. “Christians and Jews....the more devout, the less violent. Not so with Islam.” Bill Donohue



Please don't waste space with another of your inane and fallacious posts.

I know you love to write your own version of history so let's compare then:

First, it is based on 7th century tribal aims, meaning the dominance of one’s tribe over all others.

• Isn't that what the Israelites did after the Exodus? They just did it first.

Second, the design for domination is not to win over others by good works and good examples, but rather by murder and threats.

• There were neither murder or threats used to convert Indonesia to Islam.
  
• On the other hand, both were used in the conversions of Native Americans to Christianity

Third, and most essential in understanding the contemporary ramifications, unlike Judeo-Christian iterations, it has not undergone a reformation: these same doctrines apply for large segments of the Muslim ummah, community

• There are certainly many fundamentalist Muslims that do some incredibly barbarous acts. Islam is <1400 years old. If you compare it to Christianity of the 1400s, there were plenty of similar atrocities.

Remember the Holocaust was done by a Christian country and Jews were taken in by the Islamic world when they were expelled from their home by Christians.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The shoe bomber has never come out of his cell here.
They have to force -feed many inmates here to keep them alive.
(Colorado)

And?


Better he be in that middle seat next to you on Delta?