Sharia Versus the US Constitution

It appears more and more advocates are trying to introduce Sharia into the US legal system. Fortunately, it appears that appeals courts are turning them away. It is, however, a sign of the incessant efforts of Muslim legal scholars to try to expand the authority of their beliefs on our American system of jurisprudence.


Get a toe in the door, and the foot follows, soon with the rest of the body inside your home.


Read the full story – with links - @ Shariah in American Courts The Expanding Incursion of Islamic Law in the U.S. Legal System Creeping Sharia

Where does it say in the Constitution that a state could not put Sharia Law in place?
State governments are republican.
 
Ever read the 1st Amendment? How about the 13th and 14th? Perhaps you need to be reminded that women have equal rights to men provided for under the Constitution as read now? All of those preclude Sharia law in the US.
 
Do you doubt the existence of creeping Sharia?
Yes
So if a religion has a rule about something a similar secular law is forbidden?




Sharia is administered by Imams. Who are they again?


"Sharia law is the law of Islam. The Sharia (also spelled Shariah or Shari'a) law is cast from the actions and words of Muhammad, which are called "Sunnah," and the Quran, which he authored.
The Sharia law itself cannot be altered, but the interpretation of the Sharia law, called "figh," by imams is given some leeway.

As a legal system, the Sharia law covers a very wide range of topics. While other legal codes deal primarily with public behavior, Sharia law covers public behavior, private behavior and private beliefs. Of all legal systems in the world today, Islam's Sharia law is the most intrusive and strict, especially against women."

SHARIA LAW - Islamic Sharia Law Explained
I don't believe anyone is talking about putting imams in charge of the legal system. You know that though

That's why they call it creeping Sharia. There are places, believe it or not, in which Sharia and imams are the law of the land.
In the US? I don't believe it. Name one
Dearborn, hell the local cops refused to protect a march by Christians that had a legal permit, they arrested them and refused to arrest the Muslims beating them with rocks and bottles.
Bold claim. Can you back it up?
 
Do you doubt the existence of creeping Sharia?
Yes
Sharia is administered by Imams. Who are they again?


"Sharia law is the law of Islam. The Sharia (also spelled Shariah or Shari'a) law is cast from the actions and words of Muhammad, which are called "Sunnah," and the Quran, which he authored.
The Sharia law itself cannot be altered, but the interpretation of the Sharia law, called "figh," by imams is given some leeway.

As a legal system, the Sharia law covers a very wide range of topics. While other legal codes deal primarily with public behavior, Sharia law covers public behavior, private behavior and private beliefs. Of all legal systems in the world today, Islam's Sharia law is the most intrusive and strict, especially against women."

SHARIA LAW - Islamic Sharia Law Explained
I don't believe anyone is talking about putting imams in charge of the legal system. You know that though

That's why they call it creeping Sharia. There are places, believe it or not, in which Sharia and imams are the law of the land.
In the US? I don't believe it. Name one
Dearborn, hell the local cops refused to protect a march by Christians that had a legal permit, they arrested them and refused to arrest the Muslims beating them with rocks and bottles.
Bold claim. Can you back it up?
Learn what Sharia entails then read the amendments.
 
I don't believe anyone is talking about putting imams in charge of the legal system. You know that though

That's why they call it creeping Sharia. There are places, believe it or not, in which Sharia and imams are the law of the land.
In the US? I don't believe it. Name one
Dearborn, hell the local cops refused to protect a march by Christians that had a legal permit, they arrested them and refused to arrest the Muslims beating them with rocks and bottles.
Bold claim. Can you back it up?
Learn what Sharia entails then read the amendments.
Again, can you back your claim about Dearborn?
 
Group up, wankers.

We have a few loony libertarians like The Rabbi, 007, etc., who are caught in Group Think. They are no threat.

We have a few loony Mises followers like EdwardBaiamonte. They are no threat.

We have a few loonies like Sil, Beagle9, Newby, etc., who want to stop marriage equality. They are no threat.

We have a few loonies among the Christian Dominionists who want to turn South Carolina into the Inquisition. They are no threat.

Creeping Sharia is like creeping McCarthyism. Nothing to worry about.






There are already parts of Europe that are under Sharia law. The local governments won't send law enforcement into those areas any longer. There are places in the US where the Islamists would likewise love to impose Sharia. So far they have been thwarted, but the desire is STILL there, and it is not arguable. That is their goal.

"Islamic extremists are stepping up the creation of "no-go" areas in European cities that are off-limits to non-Muslims.
Many of the "no-go" zones function as microstates governed by Islamic Sharia law. Host-country authorities effectively have lost control in these areas and in many instances are unable to provide even basic public aid such as police, fire fighting and ambulance services.
The "no-go" areas are the by-product of decades of multicultural policies that have encouraged Muslim immigrants to create parallel societies and remain segregated rather than become integrated into their European host nations.
In Britain, for example, a Muslim group called Muslims Against the Crusades has launched a campaign to turn twelve British cities – including what it calls "Londonistan" – into independent Islamic states. The so-called Islamic Emirates would function as autonomous enclaves ruled by Islamic Sharia law and operate entirely outside British jurisprudence."




European No-Go Zones for Non-Muslims Proliferating
 
That's why they call it creeping Sharia. There are places, believe it or not, in which Sharia and imams are the law of the land.
In the US? I don't believe it. Name one
Dearborn, hell the local cops refused to protect a march by Christians that had a legal permit, they arrested them and refused to arrest the Muslims beating them with rocks and bottles.
Bold claim. Can you back it up?
Learn what Sharia entails then read the amendments.
Again, can you back your claim about Dearborn?




There is certainly nothing official, however, the local government has bent over backwards to support the Islamists in Dearborn, to the point they have actively violated the rights of Christians who were demonstrating at Muslim events.

Is it smart for someone to do that? No, of course not. But this is the USA and people are allowed to make asses of themselves without government intervention so long as they harm no one. In Dearborn that has not been the case as this most recent Court ruling has shown...


"A Detroit judge has awarded over $100,000 in attorney’s fees in the case of a Christian, George Saieg, who was attacked and arrested at the festival.
“This case is a stunning example of the pernicious influence of stealth jihad and Shariah law in America. The city of Dearborn is now a serial violator of Christians’ constitutional rights and has wasted hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees and costs defending its insidious conduct. Apparently, in Dearborn, where Shariah and jihad is advocated openly, it is a crime to preach the Christian gospel. AFLC is committed to stopping this attack on our Constitution. And the ruling today allows us to do just that,” said Yerushalmi, an AFLC attorney.
A federal judge in Michigan has decided to allow a civil-rights claim against the city of Dearborn by four Christians arrested at the city’s Arab festival to move forward.
In that case, the city was told to pay the fees on behalf of Christian Pastor George Saieg, who had been arrested at the 2009 event. Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen said his recommendation was for fees and costs totaling $103,401.96 to be awarded in the case that was handled by attorney Robert J. Muise."


CHRISTIANS WIN BIG LAWSUIT AGAINST MUSLIM THUGS IN DEARBORN MICHIGAN
 
It appears more and more advocates are trying to introduce Sharia into the US legal system. Fortunately, it appears that appeals courts are turning them away. It is, however, a sign of the incessant efforts of Muslim legal scholars to try to expand the authority of their beliefs on our American system of jurisprudence.


Get a toe in the door, and the foot follows, soon with the rest of the body inside your home.


Read the full story – with links - @ Shariah in American Courts The Expanding Incursion of Islamic Law in the U.S. Legal System Creeping Sharia

Where does it say in the Constitution that a state could not put Sharia Law in place?
State governments are republican.

Your answer has nothing to do with my question.
 
It appears more and more advocates are trying to introduce Sharia into the US legal system. Fortunately, it appears that appeals courts are turning them away. It is, however, a sign of the incessant efforts of Muslim legal scholars to try to expand the authority of their beliefs on our American system of jurisprudence.


Get a toe in the door, and the foot follows, soon with the rest of the body inside your home.


Read the full story – with links - @ Shariah in American Courts The Expanding Incursion of Islamic Law in the U.S. Legal System Creeping Sharia


The book is bullshit and a scare tactic to sell copies. This is not going to happen.
 
That's why they call it creeping Sharia. There are places, believe it or not, in which Sharia and imams are the law of the land.
In the US? I don't believe it. Name one
Dearborn, hell the local cops refused to protect a march by Christians that had a legal permit, they arrested them and refused to arrest the Muslims beating them with rocks and bottles.
Bold claim. Can you back it up?
Learn what Sharia entails then read the amendments.
Again, can you back your claim about Dearborn?
Look it up it was in the news and several threads were started here. I am not your servant.
 
In the US? I don't believe it. Name one
Dearborn, hell the local cops refused to protect a march by Christians that had a legal permit, they arrested them and refused to arrest the Muslims beating them with rocks and bottles.
Bold claim. Can you back it up?
Learn what Sharia entails then read the amendments.
Again, can you back your claim about Dearborn?
Look it up it was in the news and several threads were started here. I am not your servant.
And several links were provided by Westwall above.
 
Dearborn, hell the local cops refused to protect a march by Christians that had a legal permit, they arrested them and refused to arrest the Muslims beating them with rocks and bottles.
Bold claim. Can you back it up?
Learn what Sharia entails then read the amendments.
Again, can you back your claim about Dearborn?
Look it up it was in the news and several threads were started here. I am not your servant.
And several links were provided by Westwall above.
Let's see a real news source that backs the claim that the police refused to arrest people who were assaulting others. Just one reputable source will do.
 
Your source is making things up, buddy, and you don't like being called on it.

Doesn't matter, son. Produce corroboration.
 

Forum List

Back
Top