Senate Republicans Block Benefits to Homeless Women Veterans

[JakeStarkey]

Lash, old dean, the fact is that you are jealous of others' courage, which tell us much about your lack of it. You have no military service, old queen, for no honorable veteran talks as you.

If giving sailors blowjobs down by the dock counts as Military "Service", than yes our Lady Lasher has quite a bit.

You're sinking lower and lower into the slime pit of stupidity, old sock.

As long as we understand where Lady Lasher splashes, OK.

 

[Trajan]

Trajan, you are the dribble on America's pant leg. If you don't support veterans, then you are morally worthless.

uh huh...


voting 3.5 billion for a prgm that already exists minus a thorough vetting of what we get for that money, is ill advised.

for instance the VA already has a request in for 5.9 billion more, so why another addition of 3.5? that's pretty hefty. they are almost doubling their request?

for instance why have they not achieved success by their own metrics? yet, that want more money?

so they are 54-46.....sounds to me like they need to account for the 12 most certainly and why they have not achieved more success on that 34%, before we give them more cash.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Trajan, you are the dribble on America's pant leg. If you don't support veterans, then you are morally worthless.

uh huh...


voting 3.5 billion for a prgm that already exists minus a thorough vetting of what we get for that money, is ill advised.

for instance the VA already has a request in for 5.9 billion more, so why another addition of 3.5? that's pretty hefty. they are almost doubling their request?

for instance why have they not achieved success by their own metrics? yet, that want more money?

so they are 54-46.....sounds to me like they need to account for the 12 most certainly and why they have not achieved more success on that 34%, before we give them more cash.

Thank for finally making a worthy statement, and I withdraw the "stain" comment. You did not deserve it. Yes, the vetting should be done. Cash benefit analysis (84%) for taking care of veterans is not the criteria, though. Homeless homeless veterans need to be taken in now. We can assign better assessments later.

 

[bodecea]

Since when did Liberals ever give a shit about veterans?

Warrior102, that comment is stupid and unworthy.

No, actually peacenicks spitting on soldiers coming home from Vietnam are stupid and unworthy.

It's always interesting to hear that story, but it's always third hand...

 

[bodecea]

Since when did Liberals ever give a shit about veterans?

This Liberal IS a veteran, bub.

 

[Lasher]

Lashar silly boy decries others for doing like Lashar. Silly Lashar.

That sounds gay to Lash. Is that all the wit you have - the ability to call people homosexual? It says more about you than it does Lash.

 

[Lasher]

Trajan, you are the dribble on America's pant leg. If you don't support veterans, then you are morally worthless.

uh huh...


voting 3.5 billion for a prgm that already exists minus a thorough vetting of what we get for that money, is ill advised.

for instance the VA already has a request in for 5.9 billion more, so why another addition of 3.5? that's pretty hefty. they are almost doubling their request?

for instance why have they not achieved success by their own metrics? yet, that want more money?

so they are 54-46.....sounds to me like they need to account for the 12 most certainly and why they have not achieved more success on that 34%, before we give them more cash.

The type of people you are answering imagine themselves to be super-patriots who exhibit their patriotism the only way they can, and that is to promote the throwing of taxpayer monies to the winds of any program they believe will make them appear to be all gung-ho for the troops they really think no more of than they do of their own selves, which is very little. These semi-vertebrates spend the majority of their lives bleating about conditions they have no control over whatsoever, but they think it shows they are big boys whose only goal in life is to right the wrongs of others. They usually seldom go out into the real world, and probably have no jobs of their own, which gives them unlimited time to blow hard in these forums. They are a pathetic, pitiful bunch.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Warrior102, that comment is stupid and unworthy.

No, actually peacenicks spitting on soldiers coming home from Vietnam are stupid and unworthy.

It's always interesting to hear that story, but it's always third hand...

The fellow from Texas that wrote the book that said it was all "myth" only posted opinions rather than uncontested empirical data. I saw it, myself, and I have had dozens of others who witnessed it or were spit on themselves.

You guys are flat wrong, period.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Trajan, you are the dribble on America's pant leg. If you don't support veterans, then you are morally worthless.

uh huh...


voting 3.5 billion for a prgm that already exists minus a thorough vetting of what we get for that money, is ill advised.

for instance the VA already has a request in for 5.9 billion more, so why another addition of 3.5? that's pretty hefty. they are almost doubling their request?

for instance why have they not achieved success by their own metrics? yet, that want more money?

so they are 54-46.....sounds to me like they need to account for the 12 most certainly and why they have not achieved more success on that 34%, before we give them more cash.

The type of people you are answering imagine themselves to be super-patriots who exhibit their patriotism the only way they can, and that is to promote the throwing of taxpayer monies to the winds of any program they believe will make them appear to be all gung-ho for the troops they really think no more of than they do of their own selves, which is very little. These semi-vertebrates spend the majority of their lives bleating about conditions they have no control over whatsoever, but they think it shows they are big boys whose only goal in life is to right the wrongs of others. They usually seldom go out into the real world, and probably have no jobs of their own, which gives them unlimited time to blow hard in these forums. They are a pathetic, pitiful bunch.

Lasher is in touch with his "pathetic, pitiful" inner Lasher and projects on those who are better informed.

 

[Lasher]

uh huh...


voting 3.5 billion for a prgm that already exists minus a thorough vetting of what we get for that money, is ill advised.

for instance the VA already has a request in for 5.9 billion more, so why another addition of 3.5? that's pretty hefty. they are almost doubling their request?

for instance why have they not achieved success by their own metrics? yet, that want more money?

so they are 54-46.....sounds to me like they need to account for the 12 most certainly and why they have not achieved more success on that 34%, before we give them more cash.

The type of people you are answering imagine themselves to be super-patriots who exhibit their patriotism the only way they can, and that is to promote the throwing of taxpayer monies to the winds of any program they believe will make them appear to be all gung-ho for the troops they really think no more of than they do of their own selves, which is very little. These semi-vertebrates spend the majority of their lives bleating about conditions they have no control over whatsoever, but they think it shows they are big boys whose only goal in life is to right the wrongs of others. They usually seldom go out into the real world, and probably have no jobs of their own, which gives them unlimited time to blow hard in these forums. They are a pathetic, pitiful bunch.

Lasher is in touch with his "pathetic, pitiful" inner Lasher and projects on those who are better informed.

Got plagiarism? Nothing new? No originality?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Got the truth, which you don't, Lasher, and I set the quote apart.

Get in touch with your little Lasher and sneak away.

You simply do not have what it takes to play here.

 

[Lasher]

Got the truth, which you don't, Lasher, and I set the quote apart.

Get in touch with your little Lasher and sneak away.

You simply do not have what it takes to play here. Edited

You are right, old sock, but Lash won't be going anywhere. You are a fool. You Jew stooges and Zionist kikes would love for Lash to leave, but it ain't gonna happen, Izzy.

Do not changed other posters quotes
PixieStix

 

[JakeStarkey]

Got the truth, which you don't, Lasher, and I set the quote apart.

Get in touch with your little Lasher and sneak away.

You simply do not have what it takes to play here, which is a 14" diameter anus.

You are right, old sock, but Lash won't be going anywhere. You are a fool. You Jew stooges and Zionist kikes would love for Lash to leave, but it ain't gonna happen, Izzy.

Changing others' quotes will get you sent on vacation, Old Lash, just to let you know. You call names, yet you get mad when same is returned. You hate Jews, which is OK, if stupid. Stay and pay. Simple as that.

 

[Lasher]

Got the truth, which you don't, Lasher, and I set the quote apart.

Get in touch with your little Lasher and sneak away.

You simply do not have what it takes to play here, which is a 14" diameter anus.

You are right, old sock, but Lash won't be going anywhere. You are a fool. You Jew stooges and Zionist kikes would love for Lash to leave, but it ain't gonna happen, Izzy.

Changing others' quotes will get you sent on vacation, Old Lash, just to let you know. You call names, yet you get mad when same is returned. You hate Jews, which is OK, if stupid. Stay and pay. Simple as that. Boo Hoo!!

..

Sounds like your gerbil is twisting around up in there or something.

 

[bodecea]

You are right, old sock, but Lash won't be going anywhere. You are a fool. You Jew stooges and Zionist kikes would love for Lash to leave, but it ain't gonna happen, Izzy.

Changing others' quotes will get you sent on vacation, Old Lash, just to let you know. You call names, yet you get mad when same is returned. You hate Jews, which is OK, if stupid. Stay and pay. Simple as that. Boo Hoo!!

..

Sounds like your gerbil is twisting around up in there or something.

How sad to be you.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Newsflash: Senate Republicans Block Benefits to Homeless Women Veterans : Ms Magazine Blog

Senate conservatives blocked the Homeless Women Veterans and Homeless Veterans with Children Act on Tuesday, following an objection from Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK, left), who spoke out in opposition to the bill. The $3.4 billion bill, introduced by Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), would have provided special benefits to homeless women veterans (as well as to homeless male veterans with dependent children). The defeat comes at a time when homelessness among women veterans has dramatically increased. According to the Department of Veterans Affairs, the number of homeless women veterans has nearly doubled over the past ten years. The trend is even more apparent among homeless veterans under 45; one in ten is a woman. What’s more, the increase in the number of homeless women veterans has coincided with a drop in homelessness among their male counterparts, according to Peter Dougherty, director of homeless veterans programs at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

YouTube - ‪Republican Senators Blocks Homeless Veterans Bill‬‏

The bill increases spending in an already existing program. Sorry but where is this money going to come from? Oh thats right, borrow it. Borrow more to spend more.

And not many people end up homeless unless they are drug addicts or have some other serious problem. I'd like to know why there are supposedly so many homeless vets.

The idiots on the left want to spend our money on stupid things. STOP THE SPENDING!!!

 

[AmericanFirst]

Newsflash: Senate Republicans Block Benefits to Homeless Women Veterans : Ms Magazine Blog

Senate conservatives blocked the Homeless Women Veterans and Homeless Veterans with Children Act on Tuesday, following an objection from Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK, left), who spoke out in opposition to the bill. The $3.4 billion bill, introduced by Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), would have provided special benefits to homeless women veterans (as well as to homeless male veterans with dependent children). The defeat comes at a time when homelessness among women veterans has dramatically increased. According to the Department of Veterans Affairs, the number of homeless women veterans has nearly doubled over the past ten years. The trend is even more apparent among homeless veterans under 45; one in ten is a woman. What’s more, the increase in the number of homeless women veterans has coincided with a drop in homelessness among their male counterparts, according to Peter Dougherty, director of homeless veterans programs at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

YouTube - ‪Republican Senators Blocks Homeless Veterans Bill‬‏

The bill increases spending in an already existing program. Sorry but where is this money going to come from? Oh thats right, borrow it. Borrow more to spend more.

And not many people end up homeless unless they are drug addicts or have some other serious problem. I'd like to know why there are supposedly so many homeless vets.

Because they are addicts and have spent their lives away for their addictions. But lets just let the gov't via the tax payers support them. Idiots.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Got the truth, which you don't, Lasher, and I set the quote apart.

Get in touch with your little Lasher and sneak away.

You simply do not have what it takes to play here. Edited

You are right, old sock, but Lash won't be going anywhere. You are a fool. You Jew stooges and Zionist kikes would love for Lash to leave, but it ain't gonna happen, Izzy.

Do not changed other posters quotes
PixieStix

I know where you will be going idiot and it is very warm there. The Jews are smarter than you , muslims, and obamaturd. Idiot!!!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Lasher is such a silly little twit.

Takes all kinds.

 

[theHawk]

False premise, Hawk, and if that is all you have now, you fail. If you will not take care of those who took care of you, then see how easy it is to show that you are an ungrateful freak? For shame.

Nice to see you can't answer the question honestly.



We already have programs that help veterans. So it is your premise that is false.

But go ahead and keep calling this veteran an "ungrateful freak".