Yes... and?Yes.... and...?I carry firearms in order to defend my life.
Alzheimer's sufferer?
#125 (permalink)
The freedom of speech is limited under conditions where the act in question harms others.
Thus, harming others is a legitimate reason to limit the exercise of a right.
The legitimacy of limits on the right to arms should be examined in that context.
__________________
The point was that NO right exists beyond the point where it harms someone else, and so restrictions on actions beyond that point do not infringe on the right in question.
The 2nd doesn't protect you if you murder someone with a gun for exactly the same reason the 1st doesnt protect you if you slander them.