actually they are, and that's why this scares you libs so much.The pro-abortionists aren't the majority, fool.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
actually they are, and that's why this scares you libs so much.The pro-abortionists aren't the majority, fool.
It also forces the legislators to stop hiding who they are. There may well be enough of them to codify Roe into law but that means they will have to vote on it and that's where they turn to yellow bellies! ALL OF THEM!All this does is put it back to the voters of each state. Of course that's what liberals fear most------------the voters.
good, sooner the betterBlue States will secede before any red States.
I think she has to be impeached. I've never seen the issue before, so not really sure but if memory of my 8th grade civics class serves, SCOTUS justices can only be removed by resignation, death or impeachment.She'll lose her job...
Roberts can refuse to allow her to sit.
they are afraid to do that, they will leave to each state's voters.----as it should beIt also forces the legislators to stop hiding who they are. There may well be enough of them to codify Roe into law but that means they will have to vote on it and that's where they turn to yellow bellies! ALL OF THEM!
The point is my friend, that Trump made everything fair game in politics in America, and now the 'fair game' is coming back to bite your asses.I wouldn't be surprised if Sotomayor is involved at the top.
Roberts cannot remove her but he can refuse to let her sit. After that the rest would be more or less automatic I think. At That point her only option would be to retire. Still I would be quite shocked if any of the justices were that stupid.I think she has to be impeached. I've never seen the issue before, so not really sure but if memory of my 8th grade civics class serves, SCOTUS justices can only be removed by resignation, death or impeachment.
Convicting Sotomayor is getting a little ahead of the curve you two.I think she has to be impeached. I've never seen the issue before, so not really sure but if memory of my 8th grade civics class serves, SCOTUS justices can only be removed by resignation, death or impeachment.
You forgot Obama...Convicting Sotomayor is getting a little ahead of the curve you two.
The consequences are hard to stomach but the rules no longer apply in America. Trump's behaviour has consequences and is coming home with the chickens.
This is an insurrection which will receive very little attention while they prattle on endlessly about 1/6.The person who leaked it, and that can be narrowed down rapidly... we all know it is going to be a legal assistant working for one of the liberal judges, that person needs to be made example of.
As in, whatever the highest punishment is... obviously including permanent loss of any law degrees, or the ability to attain one, imprisonment of I would say at least 1 year with a fine of $100,000 or more. With a ruling that they can never be employed in the judical system for life.
I would say this if it was a conservative assistant.
FYI, because I'm a responsible person and I believe you are too. I'm not in favour of abortion. No decent person should be, but we don't duck (duck, no pun intended) the responsibility of facing the issue that isn't going to vanish overnight with abolishing R vs. W.Roberts cannot remove her but he can refuse to let her sit. After that the rest would be more or less automatic I think. At That point her only option would be to retire. Still I would be quite shocked if any of the justices were that stupid.
Yes.... This moment should have taken place 50 years ago.FYI, because I'm a responsible person and I believe you are too. I'm not in favour of abortion. No decent person should be, but we don't duck (duck, no pun intended) the responsibility of facing the issue that isn't going to vanish overnight with abolishing R vs. W.
That's the irresponsible part of it all.
You reached way up your ass to pull out that little piece of nonsense.The point is my friend, that Trump made everything fair game in politics in America, and now the 'fair game' is coming back to bite your asses.
Bullshit, duck. There are a very limited number of people who are privy to that info. The truth WILL come out on this one.The possibilities of who leaked the plan are too numerous to ever root out.
As usual, you are spouting numbers with NO substantiation, duck. Quit lying or produce a source.59% of Americans at least are pro-women's rights and if the anti-women posers are lumped in, that is likely as high as 75% in favour of ending this nonsense of opposition to abortions.
Fuck off duck. We are not interested in your commie solutions from Canada. Fix your own house.Ask me politely about those solutions!
Freedom to vaccinate but not freedom to declineIt's another freedom issue. The freedom to do the right thing and be vaccinated, without having to face harrassment from radicals who believe in deworming medicine to prevent covid, for strictly poltical reasons.
and how did you...We already knew it was legitimate, this doesn't need a topic.
There's part of your problem, duck. No one called for convicting anyone. The point was speculation about who MIGHT have leaked and what the possible outcome could be. Now STFU and go fix TURDEAU.Convicting Sotomayor is getting a little ahead of the curve you two.
I really very much doubt that the leaker has been careless.You forgot Obama...
Also the leak will lead to a high profile prosecution that neither party will be able to stop. There is just no question about it. I personally do not think any sitting justice could be that stupid. But an activist staffer? Yeah maybe.
Responsible people don't embed themselves in the affairs of other nations of which they have no standing duck.because I'm a responsible person