Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They do. It's just that a reasoned answer isn't particularly newsworthy. Democrats don't have to pander to an illogical, anti-science base.Why doesnt the media ask democrats these type questions?
They do. It's just that a reasoned answer isn't particularly newsworthy. Democrats don't have to pander to an illogical, anti-science base.Why doesnt the media ask democrats these type questions?
Walker has track record of getting PUNKED by callers pretending to be David KochThe broader issue Mr Atheist is "do you side with science or do you side with stupid dogma"....you side with stupid dogma ...
Well, to me the choice is, "Do you side with a shrill old lady who only has a position due to family connections, or do I side with a guy who has a track record of getting things done."
Now, there's good reasons to not vote for Walker. For instance, the kind of people he'd probably appoint to the Supreme court would lead to more awful decisions.
Frankly, I'm going to vote for the guy I think gets it and can make my life better.
because Democrats are not anti Science whack a doodles....Why doesnt the media ask democrats these type questions?
It has to do with the advisers and appointees he'd have in his administration, and the influence they'd have on the process used to determine the judges and justices nominated to the Federal courts, including the Supreme Court; consequently it's a perfectly appropriate and legitimate criterion to consider when evaluating a presidential candidate.He should have the courage to express his opinion – if he believes the Earth is only 6000 years old, he should clearly state it.
Or not.
What does what he thinks about how old the earth is have to do with his ability to run the country?
Look the reality is, America IS 90% Christian. If you guys really think this is the issue you are going to trip this guy up on, you are going to be disappointed.
Scott Walker Humiliates Himself On The World Stage By Dodging A Question About Evolution
Scott Walker's 2016 presidential hopes were dealt another blow when the Wisconsin Republican refused to answer a BBC reporter's question about evolution while addressing a think tank in…
The front cover of the National Geographic Magazine states exactly why that question is important. Big bold letters, "The War On Science". Are we going to elect a President who will turn that into policy?
That's funny, I never hear Democrats being asked about it. Most libtards don't understand the difference between macro and micro evolution anyway so you will get sucked into that argument if you let them.They do. It's just that a reasoned answer isn't particularly newsworthy. Democrats don't have to pander to an illogical, anti-science base.Why doesnt the media ask democrats these type questions?
The only war on science that exists is in the dank depraved mind of the liberal seeking to shut up any opposing voices.The front cover of the National Geographic Magazine states exactly why that question is important. Big bold letters, "The War On Science". Are we going to elect a President who will turn that into policy?
Yet another republican would be candidate messes up in London. Scott Walker drew laughter by refusing to discuss evolution. How embarrassing.
Scott Walker Goes for Bland Ends Up Moronic on Evolution Softball - The Daily Beast
Scott Walker wanted to avoid a Christie-like mistake during his trip to London this week. He failed.
LONDON — Governor Scott Walker was so determined not to make news during his trip to London this week, he made news.
A week after Chris Christie’s disastrous trip to London, Walker was desperate to avoid the kind of slip that cost the New Jersey governor any positive headlines back home.
“I’d rather be bland than stupid or moronic,” he said.
Sadly, he may have been all three.
He was attempting to bolster his foreign policy credentials by saying nothing at all, and during a question and answer session at a foreign policy think tank he refused to be drawn on whether he believed in evolution.
“I’m going to punt on that one as well,” he said, which was met by harrumphs in the audience at a foreign policy think tank. It was suggested that pretty much any politician on earth could manage to answer that one. Walker changed tack, but only slightly: “I like the evolution of trade in Wisconsin.”
The dullness did not end there.
<more>
he has to grovel to his slack jawed bible thumping base who are just like him. any wonder why he couldn't hack college
Maybe too many assholes like you so he decided to go into the private sector. Most people don't consider someone working for a living distasteful....he has to grovel to his slack jawed bible thumping base who are just like him. any wonder why he couldn't hack college
