Scientists Suggest Earth Could Be Uninhabitable In 300 Years

[syrenn]

Would you care to back you suggestions with some real science? From real peer reviewed journals?

Instead of diging up links for you, how about you just think about this.

Ever hear of the different ice ages? Global warming is what thawed them.

It doesn't get much simpler then that.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Ah yes the history of the earth.

Hot

Cold

Hot

Cold

Hot

Cold


Did I miss any?

 

[syrenn]

Ah yes the history of the earth.

Hot
Cold
Hot
Cold
Hot
Cold
Did I miss any?

Yep, one more
Hot
Warm
Cold

You forgot about the warm in the middle

 

[Old Rocks]

Would you care to back you suggestions with some real science? From real peer reviewed journals?

Instead of diging up links for you, how about you just think about this.

Ever hear of the different ice ages? Global warming is what thawed them.

It doesn't get much simpler then that.

Yes, I have. In fact, here are the people that I have heard such things from, since college days in the 60s.

A23A

 

[Oddball]

Would you care to back you suggestions with some real science? From real peer reviewed journals?

Instead of diging up links for you, how about you just think about this.

Ever hear of the different ice ages? Global warming is what thawed them.

It doesn't get much simpler then that.

He ignores the fact that Malthus, Galbraith and Ehrlich were dead wrong, too.

Blind faith is like that.

 

[Old Rocks]

Hmmmm....... ol' Dooodeee........ That particular lecture has nothing at all to do with any of those people.

 

[Oddball]

They were wrong and so are you and your "scientists".

Deal with it, pink boy.

 

[Old Rocks]

They were wrong and so are you and your "scientists".

Deal with it, pink boy.

Your proof of which is?

 

[SFC Ollie]

Ah yes the history of the earth.

Hot
Cold
Hot
Cold
Hot
Cold
Did I miss any?

Yep, one more
Hot
Warm
Cold

You forgot about the warm in the middle

Ah yes, should read:
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm

That better?

 

[syrenn]

Ah yes the history of the earth.

Hot
Cold
Hot
Cold
Hot
Cold
Did I miss any?

Yep, one more
Hot
Warm
Cold

You forgot about the warm in the middle

Ah yes, should read:
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm

That better?

Yes, that is much better.

I am not sure how much easier or simpler it gets then that. Hot,Warm, Cold, Warm Hot.

 

[Oddball]

They were wrong and so are you and your "scientists".

Deal with it, pink boy.

Your proof of which is?

The proof is that you'll not accept any evidence short of the hoaxers coming out and admitting as much...And you're such a blind warmerist cargo cultist nutbar that you probably wouldn't even believe that.

 

[Samson]

Yep, one more
Hot
Warm
Cold

You forgot about the warm in the middle

Ah yes, should read:
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm

That better?

Yes, that is much better.

I am not sure how much easier or simpler it gets then that. Hot,Warm, Cold, Warm Hot.

I'm simple, easy, and hot.



oh, and I forgot: cheap.

 

[gslack]

Ok so which is it warmers? 100 or 300 years? Which batch of your scientists are lying this time? Are the 100 years guys lying or the 300 years guys lying?

Also, if we will out of fossil fuels in the next 60-70 years and when we burn them all we will contribute 5,000 gigatons of CO2; how could we match the 13,000 to 43,000 gigatons of CO2 it took in the past to create acidic oceans and out of control warming?

Come on douchebags stop re-posting the same garbage. man up for once and stand up with your claims when they take fire.... Unbelievable how you guys operate.... Are you guys under the command of a 13 year old or what?

Seriously you are the most ill-informed and unprepared warmers I have met.....

 

[RollingThunder]

Yep, one more
Hot
Warm
Cold

You forgot about the warm in the middle

Ah yes, should read:
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm

That better?

Yes, that is much better.

I am not sure how much easier or simpler it gets then that. Hot,Warm, Cold, Warm Hot.

You confusing 'simple' with 'simple-minded', which is what you and your half-witted analysis are. You denier cultists barely qualify as half-wits so it is not very surprising that your take on things is so very simple-minded and moronic.

You are like some idiot claiming that because in the past there have been forest fires caused by natural causes, like lightening strikes, then all the forest fires now can't possibly be caused by humans. You are quite frankly much too stupid to understand how illogical and naive your BS claims are.

Crawl back in your holes, little retards, you don't know your asses from your elbows.

 

[gslack]

Ah yes, should read:
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm
Hot
Warm
Cold
Warm

That better?

Yes, that is much better.

I am not sure how much easier or simpler it gets then that. Hot,Warm, Cold, Warm Hot.

You confusing 'simple' with 'simple-minded', which is what you and your half-witted analysis are. You denier cultists barely qualify as half-wits so it is not very surprising that your take on things is so very simple-minded and moronic.

You are like some idiot claiming that because in the past there have been forest fires caused by natural causes, like lightening strikes, then all the forest fires now can't possibly be caused by humans. You are quite frankly much too stupid to understand how illogical and naive your BS claims are.

Crawl back in your holes, little retards, you don't know your asses from your elbows.

And you are confusing fact with fantasy socko....

I showed you the truth using your own sources and you still chant the mantra....

Face it your pseudo-science is only as solid as its premise. The premise is bullshit and its been proven by your own scientists... Therefore the pseudo-science is equally bullshit....

just like coming in here under several identities and or proxies....

 

[syrenn]

You confusing 'simple' with 'simple-minded', which is what you and your half-witted analysis are. You denier cultists barely qualify as half-wits so it is not very surprising that your take on things is so very simple-minded and moronic.

You are like some idiot claiming that because in the past there have been forest fires caused by natural causes, like lightening strikes, then all the forest fires now can't possibly be caused by humans. You are quite frankly much too stupid to understand how illogical and naive your BS claims are.

Crawl back in your holes, little retards, you don't know your asses from your elbows.

Sometimes the simple answers are the hardest to understand or accept.

I don't believe anyone would argue or discredit that ice ages are thawed by global warming.

However please feel free to try

 

[Oddball]

You confusing 'simple' with 'simple-minded', which is what you and your half-witted analysis are. You denier cultists barely qualify as half-wits so it is not very surprising that your take on things is so very simple-minded and moronic.

You are like some idiot claiming that because in the past there have been forest fires caused by natural causes, like lightening strikes, then all the forest fires now can't possibly be caused by humans. You are quite frankly much too stupid to understand how illogical and naive your BS claims are.

Crawl back in your holes, little retards, you don't know your asses from your elbows.

"Simple" as in Occam's razor, Mr. Elbowhole.

 

[Samson]

You confusing 'simple' with 'simple-minded', which is what you and your half-witted analysis are. You denier cultists barely qualify as half-wits so it is not very surprising that your take on things is so very simple-minded and moronic.

You are like some idiot claiming that because in the past there have been forest fires caused by natural causes, like lightening strikes, then all the forest fires now can't possibly be caused by humans. You are quite frankly much too stupid to understand how illogical and naive your BS claims are.

Crawl back in your holes, little retards, you don't know your asses from your elbows.

Sometimes the simple answers are the hardest to understand or accept.

I don't believe anyone would argue or discredit that ice ages are thawed by global warming.

However please feel free to try

Ice ages should be thawed by running cold water over them.

 

[syrenn]

"Simple" as in Occam's razor,

LOL, is see you see.

 

[gslack]

You confusing 'simple' with 'simple-minded', which is what you and your half-witted analysis are. You denier cultists barely qualify as half-wits so it is not very surprising that your take on things is so very simple-minded and moronic.

You are like some idiot claiming that because in the past there have been forest fires caused by natural causes, like lightening strikes, then all the forest fires now can't possibly be caused by humans. You are quite frankly much too stupid to understand how illogical and naive your BS claims are.

Crawl back in your holes, little retards, you don't know your asses from your elbows.

Sometimes the simple answers are the hardest to understand or accept.

I don't believe anyone would argue or discredit that ice ages are thawed by global warming.

However please feel free to try

Ice ages should be thawed by running cold water over them.

Don't give him that kind of fuel.... he will back with a thread about running water stirring up the oceans causing faster global warming....