Zone1 School forces 7th grader to remove ideological T shirt despite hanging ideological flags/posters

Yep. Everyone knows you Bible thumpers are the ones with the credible theories.... :lmao:
Everyone knows you bed wetters support groomers. Sick fucks.

bed-wettingN1.png
 
And alsoā€¦ you made a specific claim based on a definition, so please address these questions

If I believe there are two genders based on biology and behavioral science..

1. how is that ā€œunreasonableā€?
2. How does it display ā€œhatredā€?
Because what you believe is stupid and not supported by science.
 
1. Most schools have a dress code which includes language about "disruptive to the school environment". That's what the shirt is. It's not that the statement is right or wrong; it's that it's designed to inflame reactions we don't need in school where (contrary to popular belief) we really are trying to educate. IMO the court should rule in the district's favor BUT

2. The district should be forced to take down all political messages unrelated to curriculum except the American flag, for the same reason.
So if the school isnā€™t following these rules, why are they kicking kids out of school for it?

Donā€™t you see the true hypocrisy here? Hypocrisy is saying ā€œX is wrong, but itā€™s okay when I do itā€. Isnā€™t the school dangerously pushing radical ideological theories on children here?? Isnā€™t that a bad thing?
 
So this kid wore a T shirt that simply stated ā€œThere are only two gendersā€, and the kid was ordered to remove it, and when he refused he was kicked out of the school and his dad had to come pick him up.

Mind you, the school displayed pro LGBTQ flags and posters around the building.

The school said they ordered the removal because others complained about it and that it made them feel ā€œunsafeā€.

So hereā€™s the question:
1. Are people unsafe from a biological statement on a T shirt? No.
2. Why are schools holding blatant double standards where they promote the minority opinion (that there are more than 2 genders) but yet feel they can suppress/intimidate/censor those who disagree (the majority opinion in America)?
3. By the schools standard, couldnā€™t he have claimed HE felt ā€œunsafeā€? Do his feelings not matter?

How about a shirt that reads "White People Suck"?

Arguably it even more true than "only 2 genders", which is readily falsifiable.
 
Because what you believe is stupid and not supported by science.
Wow, your chance to explain and you bring ā€œbecause itā€™s stupidā€.

What a waste of time you are. Next time Please just lead that all of your belief, ā€œevidenceā€, and reason on an issue is based on that you think anyone who questions it is just ā€œstupidā€.

You have no proof/reason despite your claims, and you run from all questions regarding the topic. Are you trolling? Youā€™d be quite the dedicated troll here
 
So if the school isnā€™t following these rules, why are they kicking kids out of school for it?

Donā€™t you see the true hypocrisy here? Hypocrisy is saying ā€œX is wrong, but itā€™s okay when I do itā€. Isnā€™t the school dangerously pushing radical ideological theories on children here?? Isnā€™t that a bad thing?
Please stop with "hypocrisy".
 
Wow, your chance to explain and you bring ā€œbecause itā€™s stupidā€.

What a waste of time you are. Next time Please just lead that all of your belief, ā€œevidenceā€, and reason on an issue is based on that you think anyone who questions it is just ā€œstupidā€.

You have no proof/reason despite your claims, and you run from all questions regarding the topic. Are you trolling? Youā€™d be quite the dedicated troll here
It isn't.

There are three genders. The only reason this shocks you is because you've never studied a foreign language..
 
How about a shirt that reads "White People Suck"?

Arguably it even more true than "only 2 genders", which is readily falsifiable.
Well, the white people shirt would be a radical statement of condemnation of people based on their skin color. Assign whatever label to that you want.

A 2 genders shirt is just a statement of common biology, and it would take an odd, radical theory for someone to try to victimize themselves from it. It would be completely irrational to expect/demand that other people adopt this niche mystical theory. Itā€™s ideological narcissism and entitlement.. You want everyone to have your viewpoint and if you donā€™t get it you throw a temper tantrum. Thatā€™s basically the trans playbook/behaviour
 
It isn't.

There are three genders. The only reason this shocks you is because you've never studied a foreign language..
3 genders?

1. No, there are 2
2. Uh oh, arenā€™t you going to be called a bigot and hateful by the LGBTQ+\{}#% community for not embracing the hundreds/thousands of genders on the undefined ā€œspectrumā€ they talk about? (Itā€™s Like listening to flat earthers). Donā€™t worry, youā€™ll find sanity and common sense on the conservative non-woke side
 
Well, the white people shirt would be a radical statement of condemnation of people based on their skin color. Assign whatever label to that you want.

A 2 genders shirt is just a statement of common biology, and it would take an odd, radical theory for someone to try to victimize themselves from it. It would be completely irrational to expect/demand that other people adopt this niche mystical theory. Itā€™s ideological narcissism and entitlement.. You want everyone to have your viewpoint and if you donā€™t get it you throw a temper tantrum. Thatā€™s basically the trans playbook/behaviour

A 2 genders shirt is just a statement of common biology

Bullshit...Biology is biology.

It's a political slogan, targeting the "non-binary".

It isn't science.
 
3 genders?

1. No, there are 2
2. Uh oh, arenā€™t you going to be called a bigot and hateful by the LGBTQ+\{}#% community for not embracing the hundreds/thousands of genders on the undefined ā€œspectrumā€ they talk about? (Itā€™s Like listening to flat earthers). Donā€™t worry, youā€™ll find sanity and common sense on the conservative non-woke side
You're wrong.

Post your qualifications.
 
Bullshit...Biology is biology.

It's a political slogan, targeting the "non-binary".

It isn't science.
The ā€œnon-binaryā€ folk have a radical niche theory, itā€™s not very interesting because itā€™s based in moral relativism, which lets anyone be anything they want because they supposedly feel it. They can believe what they want, but they arenā€™t entitled to society and others participating in their belief.
 
Yes...

You obsess about this.

You're pathological.

I'm suspicious.
Again, no point to what you replied to. And, youā€™re trying to assign negative attributes to someone who disagrees with you.. which is hack 101 debate.

Why are getting so angry? Donā€™t be so mad and insecure. ;)
 
The ā€œnon-binaryā€ folk have a radical niche theory, itā€™s not very interesting because itā€™s based in moral relativism, which lets anyone be anything they want because they supposedly feel it. They can believe what they want, but they arenā€™t entitled to society and others participating in their belief.


The ā€œnon-binaryā€ folk have a radical niche theory
Post your credentials.
 
?

Are you going to pathetically put forth an ā€œappeal to authorityā€ argument?
Right....because we should continue to rely exclusively on your assertions.

The reason you reduce it to "2 genders" is because you are too stupid to understand biology.

No one should be obliged to live under the tyranny of your ignorance.
 
Wow, your chance to explain and you bring ā€œbecause itā€™s stupidā€.

What a waste of time you are. Next time Please just lead that all of your belief, ā€œevidenceā€, and reason on an issue is based on that you think anyone who questions it is just ā€œstupidā€.

You have no proof/reason despite your claims, and you run from all questions regarding the topic. Are you trolling? Youā€™d be quite the dedicated troll here
You have no proof. I'm more than happy to have this debate, again, but I previously linked to an explanation between the difference of sex and gender and you simply ignored it. All you've had for evidence so far on your end are the pejoratives of calling people weird. If you want to try your hand at objective debate then let's have at it.

Biological sex refers to characteristics of your biological make up. Typically your chromosomes and sexual reproductive system. They are objective. Gender refers to social roles. They are subjective. I have a penis. That's an objective biological fact. Women are caregivers on the otherhand is an entirely subjective statement. Some women aren't care givers. Some women would be terrible at it. The role of caregiver for women is a socially expected one rather than a emergent property from every woman's biology.
 

Forum List

Back
Top