Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Schlafly Treat Gay Marriage Ruling Like Abe Lincoln Treated Infamous Dred Scott Case We Don t Have to Obey
july 31 2015 Long-time conservative activist, best selling author, and syndicated columnist Phyllis Schlafly said the 5 (of 9) judges on the Supreme Court who voted for homosexual marriage “made it up” because there is nothing in the Constitution about such arrangements, and added that Americans, like Abraham Lincoln, should treat the ruling like the Dred Scott case: don’t accept it or obey it.
“That’s right, there's nothing in the Constitution about homosexual marriage,” said Schlafly during a July 29 interview on PIJN News, hosted by Gordon Klingenschmit.
“The judges made it up,” she said, “and some people think that because they did, and the Supreme Court has spoken, therefore we have to accept it. We don't.”
Good idea, as long as you love lawsuits, lawyers, legal bills, judges, courtrooms, jails, and drastic career changes. By all means...Judges can't write laws though they did here. The first words of the constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states". The states should ignore this court-made law and say "you want a law legalizing this, then have congress pass it".
Schlafly Treat Gay Marriage Ruling Like Abe Lincoln Treated Infamous Dred Scott Case We Don t Have to Obey
july 31 2015 Long-time conservative activist, best selling author, and syndicated columnist Phyllis Schlafly said the 5 (of 9) judges on the Supreme Court who voted for homosexual marriage “made it up” because there is nothing in the Constitution about such arrangements, and added that Americans, like Abraham Lincoln, should treat the ruling like the Dred Scott case: don’t accept it or obey it.
“That’s right, there's nothing in the Constitution about homosexual marriage,” said Schlafly during a July 29 interview on PIJN News, hosted by Gordon Klingenschmit.
“The judges made it up,” she said, “and some people think that because they did, and the Supreme Court has spoken, therefore we have to accept it. We don't.”
Good idea, as long as you love lawsuits, lawyers, legal bills, judges, courtrooms, jails, and drastic career changes. By all means...
"The provisions relating to the federal judicial power in Article III state:Good idea, as long as you love lawsuits, lawyers, legal bills, judges, courtrooms, jails, and drastic career changes. By all means...
So show us where the constitution grants judges authority to write, rewrite or repeal laws.
"The provisions relating to the federal judicial power in Article III state:So show us where the constitution grants judges authority to write, rewrite or repeal laws.
“ The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court,
.
The SC dumped unconstitutional laws, dumbass, they didn't write new ones. That is what they do."The provisions relating to the federal judicial power in Article III state:So show us where the constitution grants judges authority to write, rewrite or repeal laws.
“ The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court,
.
But writing laws is NOT a judicial function, you nitwit. It's a legislative function. THINK
Lincoln, the GOP leader? Oh right, you hate that, who kept the nation as one.The comparison is a bad one. The Supreme Court told Herr Lincoln Über Alles that he couldn't use the Alien and Sedition Act to prosecute political dissidents. They were right. Today the Courts are acting lawlessly, but back then it was the president who was a lawless tyrant needing to be reigned in. The Furor ignored not only the Supreme Court, but the Constitution as well with his illegal war. If trying to arrest the Chief Justice wasn't proof that he was mad with power, then nothing will convince the Lincoln cultists.
Using guns to kill. Remember the conversation we just had? Maybe you love guns and killing only when it's done to people you hate.Lincoln, the GOP leader? Oh right, you hate that, who kept the nation as one.The comparison is a bad one. The Supreme Court told Herr Lincoln Über Alles that he couldn't use the Alien and Sedition Act to prosecute political dissidents. They were right. Today the Courts are acting lawlessly, but back then it was the president who was a lawless tyrant needing to be reigned in. The Furor ignored not only the Supreme Court, but the Constitution as well with his illegal war. If trying to arrest the Chief Justice wasn't proof that he was mad with power, then nothing will convince the Lincoln cultists.
Yep, we needed to guns to kill your kind, and I'm perfectly fine with the fact that we did.Using guns to kill. Remember the conversation we just had? Maybe you love guns and killing only when it's done to people you hate.Lincoln, the GOP leader? Oh right, you hate that, who kept the nation as one.The comparison is a bad one. The Supreme Court told Herr Lincoln Über Alles that he couldn't use the Alien and Sedition Act to prosecute political dissidents. They were right. Today the Courts are acting lawlessly, but back then it was the president who was a lawless tyrant needing to be reigned in. The Furor ignored not only the Supreme Court, but the Constitution as well with his illegal war. If trying to arrest the Chief Justice wasn't proof that he was mad with power, then nothing will convince the Lincoln cultists.
You did use your guns to kill my kind....by the thousands. Then you pushed the survivors onto shitty reservations. The wholesale massacre of my kind was made possible by your illegal war which raised an army big enough for the task.Yep, we needed to guns to kill your kind, and I'm perfectly fine with the fact that we did.Using guns to kill. Remember the conversation we just had? Maybe you love guns and killing only when it's done to people you hate.Lincoln, the GOP leader? Oh right, you hate that, who kept the nation as one.The comparison is a bad one. The Supreme Court told Herr Lincoln Über Alles that he couldn't use the Alien and Sedition Act to prosecute political dissidents. They were right. Today the Courts are acting lawlessly, but back then it was the president who was a lawless tyrant needing to be reigned in. The Furor ignored not only the Supreme Court, but the Constitution as well with his illegal war. If trying to arrest the Chief Justice wasn't proof that he was mad with power, then nothing will convince the Lincoln cultists.
The Obergefell Court didn't 'write' any laws, it reviewed the constitutionality of state measures seeking to deny same-sex couples access to marriage law they're eligible to participate in, and held that such measures violated the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, as the Supreme Court is authorized to do by Articles III and VI of the Constitution.Judges can't write laws though they did here. The first words of the constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states". The states should ignore this court-made law and say "you want a law legalizing this, then have congress pass it".
Schlafly Treat Gay Marriage Ruling Like Abe Lincoln Treated Infamous Dred Scott Case We Don t Have to Obey
july 31 2015 Long-time conservative activist, best selling author, and syndicated columnist Phyllis Schlafly said the 5 (of 9) judges on the Supreme Court who voted for homosexual marriage “made it up” because there is nothing in the Constitution about such arrangements, and added that Americans, like Abraham Lincoln, should treat the ruling like the Dred Scott case: don’t accept it or obey it.
“That’s right, there's nothing in the Constitution about homosexual marriage,” said Schlafly during a July 29 interview on PIJN News, hosted by Gordon Klingenschmit.
“The judges made it up,” she said, “and some people think that because they did, and the Supreme Court has spoken, therefore we have to accept it. We don't.”
The SC dumped unconstitutional laws, dumbass, they didn't write new ones. That is what they do.
The comparison is a bad one. The Supreme Court told Herr Lincoln Über Alles that he couldn't use the Alien and Sedition Act to prosecute political dissidents. They were right. Today the Courts are acting lawlessly, but back then it was the president who was a lawless tyrant needing to be reigned in. The Furor ignored not only the Supreme Court, but the Constitution as well with his illegal war. If trying to arrest the Chief Justice wasn't proof that he was mad with power, then nothing will convince the Lincoln cultists.
Same thing goes for abortion.The SC dumped unconstitutional laws, dumbass, they didn't write new ones. That is what they do.
By nullifying laws against gay marriage they legalized it. That's writing a law.
You say it's the court's job to repeal laws they say are unconstitutional? Where does the constitution give them that power.
The Obergefell Court didn't 'write' any laws, it reviewed the constitutionality of state measures seeking to deny same-sex couples access to marriage law they're eligible to participate in, and held that such measures violated the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, as the Supreme Court is authorized to do by Articles III and VI of the Constitution.
That link has already been posted in this thread. I'm not interested in repeating myself.The SC dumped unconstitutional laws, dumbass, they didn't write new ones. That is what they do.
By nullifying laws against gay marriage they legalized it. That's writing a law.
You say it's the court's job to repeal laws they say are unconstitutional? Where does the constitution give them that power.
