Say, 2018 looks like a looming disaster for Senate Democrats

[Hossfly]

Still, didn't learn the first time.

So if not Warren, then who do you think should on the democratic ticket. Anyone democrats choose you will not like. They could choose Ghandi and you would still say bad choice.

They could dig up Kennedy and still lose badly because Americans finally realize that Bedroom Jack wasn't the Second Coming that was so widely celebrated. It was the beginning of the end.

And we will soon find out that Groping Donald isn't either.

Who cares?

 

[Pop23]

Democrats have gotten lazy. When Obama won they thought the fight for liberties were over. They thought the country was progressing. But it's obvious we still have a lot of backwards conservative mofos in this country.

Democrats needed to lose to get off of their behinds. They have two years to start working for the people again and stop working for cooperations.

It is precisely this, the Democratic Party is made up of groups that don't coexist naturally.

Support for Illegal immigration loses support by Union and middle class workers.

Support for LBGT and abortion loses Catholic voters.

The Democrats put themselves in a corner they can't easily get out of without throwing a key demographic under the bus.

Too damn bad

 

[Correll]

Win the mid terms. Have a complaint Congress.

By 'compliant congress', you wouldn't happen to mean one that does what the liberals want, would you?

DAMN IT.

COMPLIANT!!!

COMPLIANT!!

 

[Fang]

Democrats don't need to worry. I'm sure Lada GaGa, Beyonce, Bruce Springsteen, Katy Perry, Jon Bon Jovi, Cher and all the other out of touch celebrities will support them in 2020. The working class families in Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin and PA all want to know what these people think.

 

[Mac1958]

Trump is the high wire act of high wire acts. The next couple of elections may well hinge on his first two years.

 

[whitehall]

Former senate majority leader Harry Reid signaled the demise of the democrat party when he chose to bail out while he was still ahead with years of graft and corruption.

 

[easyt65]

DAMN IT.

COMPLIANT!!!

COMPLIANT!!

You know I am just messing with you, right?! lol Have a good weekend!

 

[RealDave]

Democrats have gotten lazy. When Obama won they thought the fight for liberties were over. They thought the country was progressing. But it's obvious we still have a lot of backwards conservative mofos in this country.

Democrats needed to lose to get off of their behinds. They have two years to start working for the people again and stop working for cooperations.

It is precisely this, the Democratic Party is made up of groups that don't coexist naturally.

Support for Illegal immigration loses support by Union and middle class workers.

Support for LBGT and abortion loses Catholic voters.

The Democrats put themselves in a corner they can't easily get out of without throwing a key demographic under the bus.

Too damn bad

If only they could be just white people.

 

[ptbw forever]

Democrats have gotten lazy. When Obama won they thought the fight for liberties were over. They thought the country was progressing. But it's obvious we still have a lot of backwards conservative mofos in this country.

Democrats needed to lose to get off of their behinds. They have two years to start working for the people again and stop working for cooperations.

It is precisely this, the Democratic Party is made up of groups that don't coexist naturally.

Support for Illegal immigration loses support by Union and middle class workers.

Support for LBGT and abortion loses Catholic voters.

The Democrats put themselves in a corner they can't easily get out of without throwing a key demographic under the bus.

Too damn bad

Their only link is the hatred of traditional America, and even that is starting to include their key demographics.

 

[ptbw forever]

Democrats have gotten lazy. When Obama won they thought the fight for liberties were over. They thought the country was progressing. But it's obvious we still have a lot of backwards conservative mofos in this country.

Democrats needed to lose to get off of their behinds. They have two years to start working for the people again and stop working for cooperations.

It is precisely this, the Democratic Party is made up of groups that don't coexist naturally.

Support for Illegal immigration loses support by Union and middle class workers.

Support for LBGT and abortion loses Catholic voters.

The Democrats put themselves in a corner they can't easily get out of without throwing a key demographic under the bus.

Too damn bad

If only they could be just white people.

You just don't get it, do you moron?

 

[kaz]

Sabato: Say, 2018 looks like a looming disaster for Senate Democrats

"Democrats blew a golden opportunity to win back control of the Senate in 2016. Republicans defended 23 seats against the Democrats’ 13, and were widely expected to suffer significant losses — more than the four seats necessary to reduce the Senate to a tie. Instead, the GOP held on in Florida, Pennsylvania, and handily won a Wisconsin race that almost everyone expected Russ Feingold to win by a large margin. If the GOP wins the run-off race in Louisiana as expected, they’ll have a 52-48 majority for the next two years — and maybe wider, if Heidi Heitkamp gets a position in the Donald Trump administration.

By 2019, that might become a filibuster-proof majority, warns Larry Sabato. Rather than the 10-seat advantage they had in 2016, Democrats will have a seventeen-seat disadvantage. Furthermore, many of those races will be in states won by Republicans in November.

It’s entirely possible that Republicans could end up with a 62-63 seat majority, which would give them carte blanche on policy for the final two years of Trump’s first term. It’s also possible that some of this potential might dissipate as a reaction to Trump’s governance, as frequently happens in midterm elections. That would require Democrats to have learned the lessons of why they lost so badly in 2016 — and so far, as Salena Zito explains, they’re still in deep denial.

They have less than two years to figure that out. So far, though, all they’ve done is kept their party’s leadership in the same hands that lost four straight election cycles and turned Democrats into that “coastal elitist club.” That portends yet another major electoral disaster for Democrats. And if Republicans and Trump actually deliver on their promises in 2017-18, it could be even worse than it looks for those coastal elites."


Sabato: Say, 2018 looks like a looming disaster for Senate Democrats - Hot Air

Since the Democrats triggered the nuclear option, filibuster doesn't matter much anyway

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

You should be jumping for joy with the bleak future of the Democratic Party in 2018 and 2020. I personally seeing Democrats losing big in 2018 and then running someone like Warren causing a second term of Trump because let be factual they never learn.

Democrats need to embrace their Blue Dog segment of their political party ( very few are left ) and stop with this march to Trotskyism...

If Warren runs , Trump will definitely be a one term president.

You are a clueless moron

 

[william the wie]

The losses are likely to be greater than expected because:

the war on sanctuary states and cities

a pro voter ID judiciary

And greater attention to cleaning up the election rolls.

More Blacks slowly going Republican

And generally higher wages.

 

[Correll]

DAMN IT.

COMPLIANT!!!

COMPLIANT!!

You know I am just messing with you, right?! lol Have a good weekend!

Yes. I was just being dramatic in my correct.

 

[william the wie]

You should be jumping for joy with the bleak future of the Democratic Party in 2018 and 2020. I personally seeing Democrats losing big in 2018 and then running someone like Warren causing a second term of Trump because let be factual they never learn.

Democrats need to embrace their Blue Dog segment of their political party ( very few are left ) and stop with this march to Trotskyism...

If Warren runs , Trump will definitely be a one term president.

You are a clueless moron

You should be jumping for joy with the bleak future of the Democratic Party in 2018 and 2020. I personally seeing Democrats losing big in 2018 and then running someone like Warren causing a second term of Trump because let be factual they never learn.

Democrats need to embrace their Blue Dog segment of their political party ( very few are left ) and stop with this march to Trotskyism...

If Warren runs , Trump will definitely be a one term president.

You are a clueless moron

Belaboring the obvious emoticons are not available so I couldn't give one.

 

[Pop23]

Democrats have gotten lazy. When Obama won they thought the fight for liberties were over. They thought the country was progressing. But it's obvious we still have a lot of backwards conservative mofos in this country.

Democrats needed to lose to get off of their behinds. They have two years to start working for the people again and stop working for cooperations.

It is precisely this, the Democratic Party is made up of groups that don't coexist naturally.

Support for Illegal immigration loses support by Union and middle class workers.

Support for LBGT and abortion loses Catholic voters.

The Democrats put themselves in a corner they can't easily get out of without throwing a key demographic under the bus.

Too damn bad

If only they could be just white people.

Aren't you one of the feeble minded that keeps shouting for a democracy?

In a democracy being a white person would be awesome. Not so cool if you're black, GLBT or disabled, but awesome for a white dude.

 

[Pop23]

Democrats have gotten lazy. When Obama won they thought the fight for liberties were over. They thought the country was progressing. But it's obvious we still have a lot of backwards conservative mofos in this country.

Democrats needed to lose to get off of their behinds. They have two years to start working for the people again and stop working for cooperations.

It is precisely this, the Democratic Party is made up of groups that don't coexist naturally.

Support for Illegal immigration loses support by Union and middle class workers.

Support for LBGT and abortion loses Catholic voters.

The Democrats put themselves in a corner they can't easily get out of without throwing a key demographic under the bus.

Too damn bad

Their only link is the hatred of traditional America, and even that is starting to include their key demographics.

Support of black lives matter cost them the support of LEO's and the military as well.

Hell, they traded Nevada for Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

And they think they have brilliance in they're side?

 

[ptbw forever]

The losses are likely to be greater than expected because:

the war on sanctuary states and cities

a pro voter ID judiciary

And greater attention to cleaning up the election rolls.

More Blacks slowly going Republican

And generally higher wages.

Wait until the millennials catch up to me on their politics....

 

[koshergrl]

Sabato: Say, 2018 looks like a looming disaster for Senate Democrats

"Democrats blew a golden opportunity to win back control of the Senate in 2016. Republicans defended 23 seats against the Democrats’ 13, and were widely expected to suffer significant losses — more than the four seats necessary to reduce the Senate to a tie. Instead, the GOP held on in Florida, Pennsylvania, and handily won a Wisconsin race that almost everyone expected Russ Feingold to win by a large margin. If the GOP wins the run-off race in Louisiana as expected, they’ll have a 52-48 majority for the next two years — and maybe wider, if Heidi Heitkamp gets a position in the Donald Trump administration.

By 2019, that might become a filibuster-proof majority, warns Larry Sabato. Rather than the 10-seat advantage they had in 2016, Democrats will have a seventeen-seat disadvantage. Furthermore, many of those races will be in states won by Republicans in November.

It’s entirely possible that Republicans could end up with a 62-63 seat majority, which would give them carte blanche on policy for the final two years of Trump’s first term. It’s also possible that some of this potential might dissipate as a reaction to Trump’s governance, as frequently happens in midterm elections. That would require Democrats to have learned the lessons of why they lost so badly in 2016 — and so far, as Salena Zito explains, they’re still in deep denial.

They have less than two years to figure that out. So far, though, all they’ve done is kept their party’s leadership in the same hands that lost four straight election cycles and turned Democrats into that “coastal elitist club.” That portends yet another major electoral disaster for Democrats. And if Republicans and Trump actually deliver on their promises in 2017-18, it could be even worse than it looks for those coastal elites."


Sabato: Say, 2018 looks like a looming disaster for Senate Democrats - Hot Air

 

[koshergrl]

Sabato: Say, 2018 looks like a looming disaster for Senate Democrats

"Democrats blew a golden opportunity to win back control of the Senate in 2016. Republicans defended 23 seats against the Democrats’ 13, and were widely expected to suffer significant losses — more than the four seats necessary to reduce the Senate to a tie. Instead, the GOP held on in Florida, Pennsylvania, and handily won a Wisconsin race that almost everyone expected Russ Feingold to win by a large margin. If the GOP wins the run-off race in Louisiana as expected, they’ll have a 52-48 majority for the next two years — and maybe wider, if Heidi Heitkamp gets a position in the Donald Trump administration.

By 2019, that might become a filibuster-proof majority, warns Larry Sabato. Rather than the 10-seat advantage they had in 2016, Democrats will have a seventeen-seat disadvantage. Furthermore, many of those races will be in states won by Republicans in November.

It’s entirely possible that Republicans could end up with a 62-63 seat majority, which would give them carte blanche on policy for the final two years of Trump’s first term. It’s also possible that some of this potential might dissipate as a reaction to Trump’s governance, as frequently happens in midterm elections. That would require Democrats to have learned the lessons of why they lost so badly in 2016 — and so far, as Salena Zito explains, they’re still in deep denial.

They have less than two years to figure that out. So far, though, all they’ve done is kept their party’s leadership in the same hands that lost four straight election cycles and turned Democrats into that “coastal elitist club.” That portends yet another major electoral disaster for Democrats. And if Republicans and Trump actually deliver on their promises in 2017-18, it could be even worse than it looks for those coastal elites."


Sabato: Say, 2018 looks like a looming disaster for Senate Democrats - Hot Air

The dems in the Senate will lose seats in 18, but it doesn't really matter, because McConnell will kill the filibuster totally if it suits him, and 2020 is where the dems have to aim, and more gopers are up then than dems.

Yes you should run with that.