The most hardcore denier loons certainly are going overtime with the tantrums. They tend do that on every thread where they get humiliated. So let's do what they hate most, and bring discussion back to the science.
Examine the error bars of the satellite measurement and the surface measurements. Note the error bars of the satellite temperature model output, as defined by the people who created that data, and as compared to the error of the surface temperature direct measurements.
Note that the surface readings fit well within the error range of the satellite readings.
That is, the premise "the surface data is better" is consistent with both the surface and satellite observations, and requires no conspiracy theories.
The premise "the satellite data is better" is not, and thus requires a conspiracy theory to make work.
Examine the error bars of the satellite measurement and the surface measurements. Note the error bars of the satellite temperature model output, as defined by the people who created that data, and as compared to the error of the surface temperature direct measurements.
Note that the surface readings fit well within the error range of the satellite readings.
That is, the premise "the surface data is better" is consistent with both the surface and satellite observations, and requires no conspiracy theories.
The premise "the satellite data is better" is not, and thus requires a conspiracy theory to make work.