Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'm still reading all the reports of Obama's nights with Larry Sinclair...
I'm still reading all the reports of Obama's nights with Larry Sinclair...
Now that he has won the final presidential election, will he drop the charade? I don't think anyone in America is ignorant of the fact that he is gay..
Actually, I'm pretty sure Obama has put Palin on ignore, as voters did.
Yawn
Of course he has Palin on ignore, he has ALL of America on ignore.
The ruled must NOT annoy their ruler with silly concerns and complaints.
Actually, the only candidate for president this year who put a segment of the People (47%) on ignore was Romney, which was a bit of folly that contributed to his substantial loss of Electoral College votes.
Of course he has Palin on ignore, he has ALL of America on ignore.
The ruled must NOT annoy their ruler with silly concerns and complaints.
Actually, the only candidate for president this year who put a segment of the People (47%) on ignore was Romney, which was a bit of folly that contributed to his substantial loss of Electoral College votes.
Apparently Mr Romney was quite right about the moronic 47%..................
Romney was right, as has been amply exposed by Detroit's demand for their quid pro quo.
Anyone who does not think that socialism is a necessary step to communism should read up on their Karl Marx because he was quite clear on what needed to be done.
Not true, Ms. Palin is entitled to the same redress of grievances we all are,
vis a vis the First Amendment.
But stupid characterizations such as socialist / communist isn't really
grievance government can redress. It's stupid rhetoric, which the 1A also protects.
Go Sarah; you're making your down syndrome kid look like the brains in the family, more so by the day.
If you really believe the USA is becoming socialist, you don't understand what socialism is.
Turn off Fox
It's bad News for America
Not true, Ms. Palin is entitled to the same redress of grievances we all are,
Which under the Obamanation is none at all.
vis a vis the First Amendment.
Obama revoked the 1st amendment.
Obamas Assault on the First Amendment - Andrew C. McCarthy - National Review Online
But stupid characterizations such as socialist / communist isn't really
grievance government can redress. It's stupid rhetoric, which the 1A also protects.
Obama is a fascist who is implementing the model of Mussolini full scale and rapidly.
Go Sarah; you're making your down syndrome kid look like the brains in the family, more so by the day.
ROFL
The party of Reid and Pelosi speaks...
Say, what WAS Teddy Kennedy's IQ? 40? 45? Honestly....
Astonishing. Absolutely fucking astonishing.
Meanwhile; and I ask this in true sincerity: did your parents drop you, frequently, when you were a child or do fall down a lot?
Astonishing. Absolutely fucking astonishing.
Meanwhile; and I ask this in true sincerity: did your parents drop you, frequently, when you were a child or do fall down a lot?
If you make it past 7th grade, you'll grasp more.
True story!
Romney was right, as has been amply exposed by Detroit's demand for their quid pro quo.
Anyone who does not think that socialism is a necessary step to communism should read up on their Karl Marx because he was quite clear on what needed to be done.
If you've ever read history, you'll know that monarchs and puppet dictators are the stepping stone to communism, while socialized mixed-economies would never dream of converting to communism. Not shit. Pick up a book and you'll see.
Romney was right, as has been amply exposed by Detroit's demand for their quid pro quo.
Anyone who does not think that socialism is a necessary step to communism should read up on their Karl Marx because he was quite clear on what needed to be done.
If you've ever read history, you'll know that monarchs and puppet dictators are the stepping stone to communism, while socialized mixed-economies would never dream of converting to communism. Not shit. Pick up a book and you'll see.
Monarchs and dictators keeping power to themselves instead of the central committee don't lead to communism. It's obvious. It's historically obvious. Communism doesn't work, if left alone, it leads to a dictatorship, like Cuba, like North Korea. Mixed, socialized/capitalist, economies exist, but they are not successful. The best of them are static. Scandanavia is static. It holds on in apathy. They are able to be static because they have financial laws that benefit economies that aren't static. The most successful mixed economy is Germany. It has a bulwark of an historically industrious people who like to work. In Russia, the principles of Karl Marx "to each according to his need, from each according to his ability" led to forced labor camps.
Read a book once in a while, but you have to get an old book, one not infused with liberalism.
Romney was right, as has been amply exposed by Detroit's demand for their quid pro quo.
Anyone who does not think that socialism is a necessary step to communism should read up on their Karl Marx because he was quite clear on what needed to be done.
If you've ever read history, you'll know that monarchs and puppet dictators are the stepping stone to communism, while socialized mixed-economies would never dream of converting to communism. Not shit. Pick up a book and you'll see.
Monarchs and dictators keeping power to themselves instead of the central committee don't lead to communism. It's obvious. It's historically obvious. Communism doesn't work, if left alone, it leads to a dictatorship, like Cuba, like North Korea. Mixed, socialized/capitalist, economies exist, but they are not successful. The best of them are static. Scandanavia is static. It holds on in apathy. They are able to be static because they have financial laws that benefit economies that aren't static. The most successful mixed economy is Germany. It has a bulwark of an historically industrious people who like to work. In Russia, the principles of Karl Marx "to each according to his need, from each according to his ability" led to forced labor camps.
Read a book once in a while, but you have to get an old book, one not infused with liberalism.
if you've ever read history, you'll know that monarchs and puppet dictators are the stepping stone to communism, while socialized mixed-economies would never dream of converting to communism. Not shit. Pick up a book and you'll see.
monarchs and dictators keeping power to themselves instead of the central committee don't lead to communism. It's obvious. It's historically obvious. Communism doesn't work, if left alone, it leads to a dictatorship, like cuba, like north korea. mixed, socialized/capitalist, economies exist, but they are not successful. the best of them are static. Scandanavia is static. It holds on in apathy. They are able to be static because they have financial laws that benefit economies that aren't static. The most successful mixed economy is germany. It has a bulwark of an historically industrious people who like to work. In russia, the principles of karl marx "to each according to his need, from each according to his ability" led to forced labor camps.
Read a book once in a while, but you have to get an old book, one not infused with liberalism.
here's a short list of mixed economies:
Usa #1 by a multiple of #2
japan #3, just a smidge behind #2
germany #4
france #5
uk #6
monarchs and dictators keeping power to themselves instead of the central committee don't lead to communism. It's obvious. It's historically obvious. Communism doesn't work, if left alone, it leads to a dictatorship, like cuba, like north korea. mixed, socialized/capitalist, economies exist, but they are not successful. the best of them are static. Scandanavia is static. It holds on in apathy. They are able to be static because they have financial laws that benefit economies that aren't static. The most successful mixed economy is germany. It has a bulwark of an historically industrious people who like to work. In russia, the principles of karl marx "to each according to his need, from each according to his ability" led to forced labor camps.
Read a book once in a while, but you have to get an old book, one not infused with liberalism.
here's a short list of mixed economies:
Usa #1 by a multiple of #2
japan #3, just a smidge behind #2
germany #4
france #5
uk #6
87-104-101-119-33 ?
