Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
LOL, I believe Palin should be LOCKED up for years for 150 bucks. there does that make you happy.
So Steph here thinks it is NOT illegal to NOT pay taxes as long as those taxes are below some certain threshold that I am sure SHE gets to set. Hmmmm seems like all the INTEGRETY gets thrown under the bus when she gets CAUGHT huh? Pretty sad if you ask me.
So, you don't see a problem with Geitner and Rangle saying they MADE a mistake on their taxes and then paid them, but Palin isn't suppose to have the same chance for 150 bucks..lets be real here, please.
we all know the real reason for this story. it probably cost the ADN 150 bucks just to print the article..And I wonder if it took 11 reporters to find this one out.
The question is NOT relevant the only question that is relevant is what money did she use(PAC MONEY) and did she (PERSONALLY) profit from the sale of those books. This is all that matters, she took money donated to a CAUSE (Sarah PAC) and used it to ENRICH (SARAH). I'm sorry but if I had donated money I would be PISSED and would demand EVERY CENT of my money be returned to me (WITH INTEREST)!
Actually it is perfectly relevant.
A PAC is a fundraising organization. Fundraising organizations/Non-profits Market themselves like any other organization or corporate entity.
The books could very well be being used in a fundraiser...such as sold at speaking engagements. With the money raised in those sales to benefit the PAC.
Has she PUBLICALLY stated that she would donate her PROFIT from the sale of those books to the PAC? That's the only way it would appear ETHICAL. What she SOULD have done was buy the books with her OWN money and donated them to her PAC!
Actually it is perfectly relevant.
A PAC is a fundraising organization. Fundraising organizations/Non-profits Market themselves like any other organization or corporate entity.
The books could very well be being used in a fundraiser...such as sold at speaking engagements. With the money raised in those sales to benefit the PAC.
Has she PUBLICALLY stated that she would donate her PROFIT from the sale of those books to the PAC? That's the only way it would appear ETHICAL. What she SOULD have done was buy the books with her OWN money and donated them to her PAC!
Did I miss something or has she publicly stated anything on this subject or is it just more of the left circle jerk to find anything questionable in anything she does?
Well Steph you are part of the party of ETHICS so you tell me if you think Sarah has acted ETHICALLY in BOTH her tax deficiency AND her purchase of her OWN book with PAC funds.
naaa, I'll leave all the judging about the MILLIONS OF DOLLARS that Palin has abused for you lefties. when you all get the truth, let me know.
NOBODY on the right has given a decent response for her "QUESTIONABLE" ethics the BEST they could manage is to question those who question Queen Palin. What a PATHETIC display of "SITUATIONAL" ethics and double standards. Oh and I DO question the ethics of people on the other side of the ailse so don't worry about me appearing hypocritical because I believe ETHICS are the MOST important factor of ANY politicians claim to elected office.
NOBODY on the right has given a decent response for her "QUESTIONABLE" ethics the BEST they could manage is to question those who question Queen Palin. What a PATHETIC display of "SITUATIONAL" ethics and double standards. Oh and I DO question the ethics of people on the other side of the ailse so don't worry about me appearing hypocritical because I believe ETHICS are the MOST important factor of ANY politicians claim to elected office.
Buying your own book is now unethical?
Palin partially owned the property.
I'm sure once informed of the money owed, she whipped out her checkbook and paid it. Things like that happen. No big deal.
Do we really want to get into the tax cheat discussion, libs?
I didn't think so.
The lib's abject fear of Palin is just plain laughable. Bunch of fuckin' pussies!
Christ, Liberals are fucking idiots!
So, what you're saying is that you can't come up with even ONE qualification that might come in a lil' handy when one might be running THE MOST POWERFUL COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!I hope you've got at least a week. It'll take her at least that long to come up with just one qualification!You first, list the Obamas, please.
Oh, my bad. He "organized communities". Balanced his check book one time, and managed to find his way to a racist church every sunday for twenty friggin years.
In the mind of the loony liberals, that's fully qualified!
Obama's qualifications:
He's over 35
He's a native American citizen
He's had U.S. residency for at least the last 14 years.
Those are his qualifications. The ONLY ones needed, besides getting the majority of the Electorial College. He got that. Palin did not.
I hope you've got at least a week. It'll take her at least that long to come up with just one qualification!You first, list the Obamas, please.
Oh, my bad. He "organized communities". Balanced his check book one time, and managed to find his way to a racist church every sunday for twenty friggin years.
In the mind of the loony liberals, that's fully qualified!
I'm sorry. I should have waited 6 more days to give my answer.
And you know she's going to make a commision off of them, how?Tell me WJ do you think it is ETHICAL to buy your OWN book with PAC funds KNOWING that you will make a commision off the sale?
And you know she's going to make a commision off of them, how?Tell me WJ do you think it is ETHICAL to buy your OWN book with PAC funds KNOWING that you will make a commision off the sale?
