Sarah Palin Attacks: "Why No Probe Of Barack 'Hussein' Obama? ( Like O'Donnells Past)

[theDoctorisIn]

lol.

He does not have to, The evidence is in our faces daily.

If you don't see it. Then you must be a hard core lib.

Well, I guess if he only wants to talk to the echo chamber, than you're right. He does not have to do anything.

But to be taken seriously, you'll have to do better than logical fallacies.

"Logical fallacies"....NIce try there, test tube.
Look, puddin, the only one in the echo chamber is you.
If you want to stick to the liberal company line while your ship sinks( losing the House and Senate this November) be my guest.
You libs are just rearranging the deck chairs..I commend you on your heroic acts to stay on board as the democrat vessel heads to the seafloor..

There are a few problems with your post.

First, I'm guessing that you don't know what "logical fallacy" means.

Second, if I'm the only one in the echo chamber, it's not much of an echo chamber, is it?

Third, I'm not a Democrat.


But, feel free to continue as you were.

 

[thereisnospoon]

First understand this: no one, and I mean no one on the Left is frightened of Sarah Palin. Speaking for myself, I'm incredulous as to why she enjoys so much support from the right. She has not accomplished anything other than quitting her post in mid-term. She has not impressed anyone with her mental acumen. She has managed to make an utter fool of herself with her lack of articulation, basic facts and general ignorance of the wide world outside her own narrow experiences.

I know it's a very convenient foil to place the veneer of "fright" over the left's criticism of Palin. Limbaugh tells you so.

I welcome Palin as a Republican candidate in 2012. If not Republican, then as a Tea Party candidate. Either way ensures in no uncertain terms, that the Republican party will doom itself to minority status for years to come. If she runs as a Tea Party candidate, the infant party will die in the cradle due to the publics ridicule and scorn for offering such an intellectual cream puff as its initial standard bearer.

Incredulous? No it's fear. If it were not fear, your side would at best debate her on the issues and at worst ignore her. You people can do neither. All your side has is personal attacks.
So you think the GOP is doomed to minority status for years to come. Newsflash, your side's own leadership has al but ceded the House to the GOP in November.
That right there in and of itself shows the Left is tearing it's collective hair out trying to figure out where they went wrong.
Sarah Palin is the liberals favorite target.
Guess what lefty, we don't care what you people say anymore. The rhetiric your side blurts out is your powerlessness to change the inevitable outcome of the Mid Term elections.

We've already done simple, folksy one dimensional thinking. Eight long, arduous years of it. We got two wars, a budget surplus turned into a record deficit with lightening speed, the cold shoulder to medical research because the simple, folksy idiot thinks petri dishes are human beings, a blind eye turned to Wall Street and then an economic collapse that is rivaled only to the one Hoover oversaw. Do you really expect us to choose simple, folksy moronic thinking again?

And yes Palin is the biggest target. Conservatives have forgotten all about Bush/Cheney. Liberals haven't. What was it Bush tried to say once? Fool me twice, Fool me again er....ah....Don't get fooled again?

The trouble with Conservatives is they never expect anyone smarter than themselves to show up.

Problem with liberals is they always believe themselves to be the smartest people in the room. Liberalism is another term for elitism.
The issue isn't that libs haven't forgotten Bush/Cheney it is that they have nothing else to on which to grasp. They see their party screwing the pooch, so they rely on blaming the past administration. That doesn't wash.
You dems have two of the three branches of government in your pocket. The president has had the bully puplit since Jan, 20th 2009. What have the dems accomplished? Rising unemployment after promising the nearly one trillion dollar stimulus plan would hold unemployment at or below 8%.....The highest price for NYMEX Gold ever..Even when adjusted for inflation. Has the federal reserve pumping worthless( 0% interest) cash into the Stock Market to produce the illusion that the markets are doing just fine, the lowest value of the US Dollar in 20 years. Borrowed more money and created deficit larger than all 43 presidential administrations combined. Comandeered the US Healthcare system with the goal of creating a solcialist single payer system of rationed inadequate health care......That's quite a list.

 

[topspin]

compared to you a lot more than liberals are elite.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Prove it.

You're kidding ,right?
Ok, let's do it this way.....Since you opened the door to stupidity, is it your conclusion the the media never once reported negative stories about Sarah Palin's family or Sarah herself? That the media did not editorialize stories to add bias against Palin.
That the media reported only the news regarding Sarah Palin and nothing of a personal nature was ever used in those reports? That satirical shows such as Saturday Night Live never poked fun at Palin while giving Obama a hall pass? That a mannequin bearing a strong resemblence to Sarah Palin was hung in effigy in a California city only to have the police chief tell those who objected that the hanging was "freedom of expression"?

Is your IQ in the double digits?.....

No, that is not my conclusion.

This is called "moving the goalposts". I never claimed that the media NEVER reported negative stories about Palin.

Your conclusion (which you still haven't produced any evidence towards) is that the media "gave Obama a pass", while systematically attempting to destroy Palin. I'm guessing you've still got nothing, right?

Nice try at spin....Moving the goalposts. Sheesh.
Look sailor, if you want to go on believing there was no deliberate attempt on the part of the media to embarrass or destroy Sarah Palin that is fine.
Facts are facts and there's nothing oyu can do about it. The MSM got their hands slammed in the drawer and all you liberals can do i scover for each other. If CYA were a virtue, you lefties would be perfect people.

 

[thereisnospoon]

compared to you a lot more than liberals are elite.

I present facts and you come back with THAT?!!!!
Hey genius. Don't bring a knife to a gunfight.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

You're kidding ,right?
Ok, let's do it this way.....Since you opened the door to stupidity, is it your conclusion the the media never once reported negative stories about Sarah Palin's family or Sarah herself? That the media did not editorialize stories to add bias against Palin.
That the media reported only the news regarding Sarah Palin and nothing of a personal nature was ever used in those reports? That satirical shows such as Saturday Night Live never poked fun at Palin while giving Obama a hall pass? That a mannequin bearing a strong resemblence to Sarah Palin was hung in effigy in a California city only to have the police chief tell those who objected that the hanging was "freedom of expression"?

Is your IQ in the double digits?.....

No, that is not my conclusion.

This is called "moving the goalposts". I never claimed that the media NEVER reported negative stories about Palin.

Your conclusion (which you still haven't produced any evidence towards) is that the media "gave Obama a pass", while systematically attempting to destroy Palin. I'm guessing you've still got nothing, right?

Nice try at spin....Moving the goalposts. Sheesh.
Look sailor, if you want to go on believing there was no deliberate attempt on the part of the media to embarrass or destroy Sarah Palin that is fine.
Facts are facts and there's nothing oyu can do about it. The MSM got their hands slammed in the drawer and all you liberals can do i scover for each other. If CYA were a virtue, you lefties would be perfect people.

Facts are indeed facts - and speaking of facts, you still have not provided any.

Good job.

 

[thereisnospoon]

No, that is not my conclusion.

This is called "moving the goalposts". I never claimed that the media NEVER reported negative stories about Palin.

Your conclusion (which you still haven't produced any evidence towards) is that the media "gave Obama a pass", while systematically attempting to destroy Palin. I'm guessing you've still got nothing, right?

Nice try at spin....Moving the goalposts. Sheesh.
Look sailor, if you want to go on believing there was no deliberate attempt on the part of the media to embarrass or destroy Sarah Palin that is fine.
Facts are facts and there's nothing oyu can do about it. The MSM got their hands slammed in the drawer and all you liberals can do i scover for each other. If CYA were a virtue, you lefties would be perfect people.

Facts are indeed facts - and speaking of facts, you still have not provided any.

Good job.

What do you want to know that you already do not know?
Try not to appear unsophisticated.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Nice try at spin....Moving the goalposts. Sheesh.
Look sailor, if you want to go on believing there was no deliberate attempt on the part of the media to embarrass or destroy Sarah Palin that is fine.
Facts are facts and there's nothing oyu can do about it. The MSM got their hands slammed in the drawer and all you liberals can do i scover for each other. If CYA were a virtue, you lefties would be perfect people.

Facts are indeed facts - and speaking of facts, you still have not provided any.

Good job.

What do you want to know that you already do know?

Well, you made the claim, it's on you to provide evidence.

"Everyone knows this" isn't evidence. Got any supporting evidence? Say, perhaps a number of negative stories on Palin vs. negative storis on Obama?

If "everyone knows" that the media systematically tried to destroy Palin, and "gave Obama a pass", there must be some numbers that prove it, right?

 

[Nosmo King]

Incredulous? No it's fear. If it were not fear, your side would at best debate her on the issues and at worst ignore her. You people can do neither. All your side has is personal attacks.
So you think the GOP is doomed to minority status for years to come. Newsflash, your side's own leadership has al but ceded the House to the GOP in November.
That right there in and of itself shows the Left is tearing it's collective hair out trying to figure out where they went wrong.
Sarah Palin is the liberals favorite target.
Guess what lefty, we don't care what you people say anymore. The rhetiric your side blurts out is your powerlessness to change the inevitable outcome of the Mid Term elections.

We've already done simple, folksy one dimensional thinking. Eight long, arduous years of it. We got two wars, a budget surplus turned into a record deficit with lightening speed, the cold shoulder to medical research because the simple, folksy idiot thinks petri dishes are human beings, a blind eye turned to Wall Street and then an economic collapse that is rivaled only to the one Hoover oversaw. Do you really expect us to choose simple, folksy moronic thinking again?

And yes Palin is the biggest target. Conservatives have forgotten all about Bush/Cheney. Liberals haven't. What was it Bush tried to say once? Fool me twice, Fool me again er....ah....Don't get fooled again?

The trouble with Conservatives is they never expect anyone smarter than themselves to show up.

Problem with liberals is they always believe themselves to be the smartest people in the room. Liberalism is another term for elitism.
The issue isn't that libs haven't forgotten Bush/Cheney it is that they have nothing else to on which to grasp. They see their party screwing the pooch, so they rely on blaming the past administration. That doesn't wash.
You dems have two of the three branches of government in your pocket. The president has had the bully puplit since Jan, 20th 2009. What have the dems accomplished? Rising unemployment after promising the nearly one trillion dollar stimulus plan would hold unemployment at or below 8%.....The highest price for NYMEX Gold ever..Even when adjusted for inflation. Has the federal reserve pumping worthless( 0% interest) cash into the Stock Market to produce the illusion that the markets are doing just fine, the lowest value of the US Dollar in 20 years. Borrowed more money and created deficit larger than all 43 presidential administrations combined. Comandeered the US Healthcare system with the goal of creating a solcialist single payer system of rationed inadequate health care......That's quite a list.

Everything was beer and skittles on January 20, 2009! Those Republicans left Washington and the country in tip top shape! It took them eight long, hard years to make the gains and accomplishments they did. Wall Street was solvent and chugging away making everyone rich. The wars were won, the troops back home and now we had rock solid allies in the Middle East. The banks were lending money, moving it through the economy and growth was phenomenal!

yep! Obama and the Democrats had the world by the string and in less than two years fouled up everything. The Republicans in the House and Senate bent over back wards to accommodate the new leadership. They worked diligently to see that the new president's agenda passed and was implemented as soon as possible. The lion laid down with the lamb.

We're expected to believe that, huh?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Facts are indeed facts - and speaking of facts, you still have not provided any.

Good job.

What do you want to know that you already do know?

Well, you made the claim, it's on you to provide evidence.

"Everyone knows this" isn't evidence. Got any supporting evidence? Say, perhaps a number of negative stories on Palin vs. negative storis on Obama?

If "everyone knows" that the media systematically tried to destroy Palin, and "gave Obama a pass", there must be some numbers that prove it, right?

Did you intentionally mess with thereisnospin's posting in that you dropped a negative along with a whole sentence. If you did it deliberately, screw you, son. If you did it unintentionally, be careful. Check post 227.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

What do you want to know that you already do know?

Well, you made the claim, it's on you to provide evidence.

"Everyone knows this" isn't evidence. Got any supporting evidence? Say, perhaps a number of negative stories on Palin vs. negative storis on Obama?

If "everyone knows" that the media systematically tried to destroy Palin, and "gave Obama a pass", there must be some numbers that prove it, right?

Did you intentionally mess with thereisnospin's posting in that you dropped a negative along with a whole sentence. If you did it deliberately, screw you, son. If you did it unintentionally, be careful. Check post 227.

He edited it after I clicked reply. But I figured out what he was trying to say, and I don't think the personal attack merits a reply anyway.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Check 227 before being flippant, because I did. Yes, it does merit a reply to "why did you do it?"

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Check 227 before being flippant, because I did. Yes, it does merit a reply to "why did you do it?"

I read it. What are you talking about when you say "why did you do it"?

I'm confused.

 

[Ozmar]

LOL, Palin was scary "stupid" enough to become a mayor, then a Governor of a state.

Indeed. And Barack Obama became president.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Check 227 before being flippant, because I did. Yes, it does merit a reply to "why did you do it?"

I read it. What are you talking about when you say "why did you do it"?

I'm confused.

Because I copied you directly, which was not spin's original posting that you copied.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Facts are indeed facts - and speaking of facts, you still have not provided any.

Good job.

What do you want to know that you already do know?

Well, you made the claim, it's on you to provide evidence.

"Everyone knows this" isn't evidence. Got any supporting evidence? Say, perhaps a number of negative stories on Palin vs. negative storis on Obama?

If "everyone knows" that the media systematically tried to destroy Palin, and "gave Obama a pass", there must be some numbers that prove it, right?

ok.. but no complaining and no spin will be permitted.
www.csmonitor.com/.../Vanity-Fair-publishes-18-page-attack-on-Sarah-Palin
When McCain picked Palin, liberal journalists coordinated the best line of attack | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment

Vanity Fair’s Gossip-Girl Digs at Sarah Palin | FrontPage Magazine

You ca also search huffngtonpost.com....
Then there was the stories printed about the child carried by Gov Palin's daughter being fathered by Todd Palin. Yes, they accused the man of incest. In a political campaign..
Nice...
Look, enough nonsense. Palin was skewered 6 ways to Sunday by the main stream media almost immediately following Sen Mc Cain's announcement that the then Alaska Governor would be his Presidential runningmate.
I know it. You know it.
Now let's cut out the bullshit. Stop acting like you are out of the loop.
Your side attacked this woman on a level so low as not be seen ever in the history of media political campaign coverage.
Marine, Jack Nicholson, Col. Nathan R. Jessep, A Few Good Men, Marine, Sound Bite

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Check 227 before being flippant, because I did. Yes, it does merit a reply to "why did you do it?"

I read it. What are you talking about when you say "why did you do it"?

I'm confused.

Because I copied you directly, which was not spin's original posting that you copied.

I know this. After I clicked reply, he edited his post, adding a negative and a personal attack. It doesn't really change anything in terms of what I replied to, as far as I can see.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Palin has been attacked more than Obama?

What about Rev. Wright? What about the birther claims? What about Obama being a Kenyan Muslm?

You guys are stupid if you think Obama hasn't been attacked.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I read it. What are you talking about when you say "why did you do it"?

I'm confused.

Because I copied you directly, which was not spin's original posting that you copied.

I know this. After I clicked reply, he edited his post, adding a negative and a personal attack. It doesn't really change anything in terms of what I replied to, as far as I can see.

Ah, then my real apology to you, dr.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Palin has been attacked more than Obama?

What about Rev. Wright? What about the birther claims? What about Obama being a Kenyan Muslm?

You guys are stupid if you think Obama hasn't been attacked.

Reverend Wright?.....Are you sure you want to play that card?
The other issues are not media generated theories. Those are the rantings of fringe luntics without so much as a single grasp on the issues.
Try again.
Reverend Wright.......That's funny.