It is obvious that Santorum is an Al-Queda plant.
Olbermann said so...although he might have been talking about his ficus....
Olbermann said so...although he might have been talking about his ficus....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And people wonder what's wrong with this country.
yeah. Because I am quite confident you were ignorant of the fact that the Supreme Court created the right in the 1970s in Griswold v. Connecticut. Unfortunate many people are ignorant of history.
/sigh
They didn't "create it".
yeah. Because I am quite confident you were ignorant of the fact that the Supreme Court created the right in the 1970s in Griswold v. Connecticut. Unfortunate many people are ignorant of history.
/sigh
They didn't "create it".
Let's see:
The right didnt exist before the decision.
The right exists after wards.
Hmmm where on earth did it come from?
Our civil laws have to ... and that's why, with the issue of abortion, as long as abortion is "legal" - at least according to the Supreme Court, "legal" in this country - we will never have rest because that law does not comport with God's law which says that all life has value, all life is created by [God,] I knew you in the womb.
and I say that as a person who is pro-life.
I wonder what issue left wingers were hysterical about before the Supreme Court created a "right" to privacy that didn't exist in the Constitution? Maybe the "unfair" treatment of communists?
The Court didnt create a right to privacy, merely acknowledged its existence, just like the right of the individual to own a handgun.yeah. Because I am quite confident you were ignorant of the fact that the Supreme Court created the right in the 1970s in Griswold v. Connecticut. Unfortunate many people are ignorant of history.
And indeed the democrats are.Romney is the man Obama will face in November.....count on it.
The same place as a right to self-defense.Let's see:
The right didnt exist before the decision.
The right exists after wards.
Hmmm where on earth did it come from?
The same place as a right to self-defense.
Santorum: God's Law And Civil Law Must Be The Same - YouTubeBy Kyle Mantyla
During The Family Leader's Thanksgiving Family Forum in Iowa on Saturday, forum moderator Frank Luntz's first question to Rick Santorum was "what's the number one value that America has lost and how would you get it back?"
Santorum's response was that America has lost the recognition that this nation was founded on the principle that our rights come from God and that, as such, we are also required to abide by God's laws ... which, he explained, was totally unlike Sharia:
Now, unlike Islam where the higher law and civil law are the same, in our case, we have civil laws but our civil laws have to comport with the higher law.
Our civil laws have to ... and that's why, with the issue of abortion, as long as abortion is "legal" - at least according to the Supreme Court, "legal" in this country - we will never have rest because that law does not comport with God's law which says that all life has value, all life is created by [God,] I knew you in the womb.
And as long as there is a discordance between the two, there will be agitation.
So, to clarify: In Islam, God's laws and the civil laws are one-and-the-same and that is theocracy and that is bad ... whereas here in the United States, our civil laws merely must be in accordance with God's law, and that is not theocracy and that is good.
And until that happens, Santorum says, this country will never have rest.
Santorum: God's Law And Civil Law Must Be The Same | Right Wing Watch