SanFran Dem wants gay Pedophiles removed from sex-offender list

[theHawk]

I don't know why you posted these pictures.

To show everyone what a deviant this guy is. No decency and flaunting his disgusting lifestyle.

 

[progressive hunter]

The Gay Pressure group, NAMBLA, is a powerful lobby in liberal states like California. If you don't think that Child Molestation of boys should be glorified, you have to get rid of politicians that are beholden to NAMBLA.

You have got to be KIDDING...you are right?

How exactly can a tiny group (who...in its heyday around 1991 numbered only around 1,100) be a pressure group?

I suspect it's a rightwing bogeyman group more useful for propagating fear of the "gay agenda" than any real world applications.

the OP topic kinda proves you wrong doesnt it???

its happening right in front of you,,,

I think you kind of miss a lot here, but that's ok.

NAMBLA has nothing to do with anything here.

The Bill is to make the law consistent - i.e. it is the same regardless of whether it is male/female or male/male (or presumably female/female but that is pretty rare). CONSISTENT.

Now, that said there is a real issue....but it's not with this bill....I'll give you a chance to guess what it is

You are wrong. It was NAMBLA that was behind the attempted change of the DSM to turn pedophilia into a sexual orientation instead of a criminal act.

They are small, but have infiltrated everywhere.

I don't thinks West...perhaps we can agree to disagree. They had their hey day long ago, with maybe a thousand max.

And...I know it seems abhorrent but there is a logic to this.

Pedophilia can be BOTH a sexual orientation AND a criminal act. It's not an either or. The fact is - pedophiles do seem oriented on children, I don't think they ever change - they just choose to become "celibate". To me, that speaks of a psychological deficit in there somewhere. As long as they don't act on the inclination, it doesn't matter, but once they do - it's a crime.

Just my two cents here.

Pedophilia is definitely a sexual orientation. It is an ABNORMAL one. It is incredibly harmful to children. NAMBLA's goal was to normalize it. And they have been successful in many ways. Your misinterpretation is an example of that. Pedophiles have a 100% recidivism rate. They do NOT remain celibate. The one who works for Salon was found to be grooming children in spite of his claims to being celibate.

Yes, they are psychologically fucked up. So what. The damage they do to children is horrible.

Totally agree.

Except that you far overrate both Nambla AND the general "influence" of any pedophile lobby. It makes good headlines, but there isn't much to it because it is not in any way comparable to sex between consenting adults.

You hear about "normalizing" it, but there really isn't much of a lobby there - it just makes good newsfeed. At most it is "normalizing it" as a sexual attraction, but NOT as an act. You can *think* what you want, but don't act on it. I suspect there are any number of pedos who don't act on it, but totally agree with you on recidivism of those who are "active" and the damage it does to children.

No, I don't. You forget my wife is a PhD psychologist and she has had to deal with NAMBLA and their efforts for decades. You seem to forget that they have been around for a long time. If they weren't being effective they would have folded long ago.

Oh hell no. There are a lot of "special interest" groups that go on and on and on stumbling along. Little to do with "effectiveness" and more to do with "solidarity".

There are no known pedophiles who have not acted on their deviancy. None. Every pedophile who has ever claimed to be celibate has ALWAYS been found to be a predator.

All of them. This is not my opinion. This is factual knowledge from my wife, and her friends, one of which puts pedophiles in prison.

You've created a fallacy there. KNOWN pedophiles. You only KNOW of them when they act. How on earth would you know otherwise? They aren't tattooed or marked or act bizarrely. If they don't act on it and get caught NO ONE KNOWS. So you really have no idea how many there are that don't act on it (or worse act on it and don't get caught).

YOURS is opinion. Poorly informed opinion at that.

No. I think it's being logical. If a pedo does not act on it, we have no way of knowing and we have no way of knowing how many don't act on it. At any rate...is it relevant? What matters is those who DO and catching them.

but only one wants to fuck little kids,,,

youre a sick bitch,,,

 

[Coyote]

Dude. No one likes pedophiles. Except other pedophiles. That's just dumb, but predictable.

Did you even think before you wrote that?

Do you realize what it says about you, and others on the left wrong, who give cover and support to pedophiles?

It says nothing about me, or the left. It simply states your own misguided belief.

 

[Coyote]

You hear about "normalizing" it, but there really isn't much of a lobby there - it just makes good newsfeed. At most it is "normalizing it" as a sexual attraction, but NOT as an act.

Really?

So what, then, is the point of “Drag Queen Story Hour”, or the homosexual/transsexual/pedophile agenda being forced into public schools, or all the attention and praise on underaged “drag queens”?

Do you seriously deny the obvious motive behind these and other related ills, which is to groom children to be easier prey for childfuckers, and to groom society as a whole to be more accepting of it? This is not about normalizing abstract, unrequited sexual attraction to children. This is about normalizing the tangible acts of sexually abusing children.

Are you talking about the overall sexualizing of young children? If so, I agree that it shouldn't be done. It's disgusting. I doubt it's "grooming though" or you ought to look at the whole big child pageant industry.

 

[Coyote]

The point is that the solution to the supposed problem is to stiffen up the penalty against Normative Pedophiles- not to give the Homo Perverts a break.

It comes up every so often, the issue of whether homosexuality correlates to child molestation.

I have repeatedly pointed out that even though homosexuals make up less than 4% of the population, nearly half of all child molestation cases are men sexually abusing boys.

Defenders of the homosexual/pedophile bunch invariably respond by denying that a man who wants to sexually abuse boys is necessarily a homosexual. This, of course, flies in the face of obvious facts, and objective word definitions. By definition, a heterosexual is only interested in sexual activity involving someone of the opposite sex. A heterosexual male pedophile would only be interested in molesting little girls, not little boys. But the homosexual/pedophile apologists persist in denying the obvious—that a man who is sexually interested in boys is in fact, a homosexual.

So, here in California, it has been the law that a man molesting a boy is treated a bit more severely than a man molesting a girl.

So, we've got this faggot in our State Senate who cries that this is unfair to faggots, and that to make things fair, we need to make molesting a boy less severe, to make it equal to molesting a girl.

How is this not an outright admission that yes, men who molest boys are, in fact, homosexuals, to claim that it is homosexuals who are being “unfairly” discriminated against by laws that treat their crime more severely than the crime of a heterosexual child molester?

Just curious. Do you OPPOSE the law being applied equally?

Why aren't you complaining about the LAW ITSELF instead of whinging on and on about homosexuals?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The Gay Pressure group, NAMBLA, is a powerful lobby in liberal states like California. If you don't think that Child Molestation of boys should be glorified, you have to get rid of politicians that are beholden to NAMBLA.

You have got to be KIDDING...you are right?

How exactly can a tiny group (who...in its heyday around 1991 numbered only around 1,100) be a pressure group?

I suspect it's a rightwing bogeyman group more useful for propagating fear of the "gay agenda" than any real world applications.

the OP topic kinda proves you wrong doesnt it???

its happening right in front of you,,,

I think you kind of miss a lot here, but that's ok.

NAMBLA has nothing to do with anything here.

The Bill is to make the law consistent - i.e. it is the same regardless of whether it is male/female or male/male (or presumably female/female but that is pretty rare). CONSISTENT.

Now, that said there is a real issue....but it's not with this bill....I'll give you a chance to guess what it is

while youre trying to put the focus on NAMBLA its their ideology thats trying to be put into legislation,,

so you can go ahead and say its not happening, we can clearly see their goals are being pushed on us,,,

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

What say you?

I believe the adult was 24 and the child was 14... that's the problem.

If you can't recognize that leave the goddamn thread.

 

[Coyote]

The Gay Pressure group, NAMBLA, is a powerful lobby in liberal states like California. If you don't think that Child Molestation of boys should be glorified, you have to get rid of politicians that are beholden to NAMBLA.

You have got to be KIDDING...you are right?

How exactly can a tiny group (who...in its heyday around 1991 numbered only around 1,100) be a pressure group?

I suspect it's a rightwing bogeyman group more useful for propagating fear of the "gay agenda" than any real world applications.

the OP topic kinda proves you wrong doesnt it???

its happening right in front of you,,,

I think you kind of miss a lot here, but that's ok.

NAMBLA has nothing to do with anything here.

The Bill is to make the law consistent - i.e. it is the same regardless of whether it is male/female or male/male (or presumably female/female but that is pretty rare). CONSISTENT.

Now, that said there is a real issue....but it's not with this bill....I'll give you a chance to guess what it is

You are wrong. It was NAMBLA that was behind the attempted change of the DSM to turn pedophilia into a sexual orientation instead of a criminal act.

They are small, but have infiltrated everywhere.

I don't thinks West...perhaps we can agree to disagree. They had their hey day long ago, with maybe a thousand max.

And...I know it seems abhorrent but there is a logic to this.

Pedophilia can be BOTH a sexual orientation AND a criminal act. It's not an either or. The fact is - pedophiles do seem oriented on children, I don't think they ever change - they just choose to become "celibate". To me, that speaks of a psychological deficit in there somewhere. As long as they don't act on the inclination, it doesn't matter, but once they do - it's a crime.

Just my two cents here.

Pedophilia is definitely a sexual orientation. It is an ABNORMAL one. It is incredibly harmful to children. NAMBLA's goal was to normalize it. And they have been successful in many ways. Your misinterpretation is an example of that. Pedophiles have a 100% recidivism rate. They do NOT remain celibate. The one who works for Salon was found to be grooming children in spite of his claims to being celibate.

Yes, they are psychologically fucked up. So what. The damage they do to children is horrible.

Totally agree.

Except that you far overrate both Nambla AND the general "influence" of any pedophile lobby. It makes good headlines, but there isn't much to it because it is not in any way comparable to sex between consenting adults.

You hear about "normalizing" it, but there really isn't much of a lobby there - it just makes good newsfeed. At most it is "normalizing it" as a sexual attraction, but NOT as an act. You can *think* what you want, but don't act on it. I suspect there are any number of pedos who don't act on it, but totally agree with you on recidivism of those who are "active" and the damage it does to children.

No, I don't. You forget my wife is a PhD psychologist and she has had to deal with NAMBLA and their efforts for decades. You seem to forget that they have been around for a long time. If they weren't being effective they would have folded long ago.

Oh hell no. There are a lot of "special interest" groups that go on and on and on stumbling along. Little to do with "effectiveness" and more to do with "solidarity".

There are no known pedophiles who have not acted on their deviancy. None. Every pedophile who has ever claimed to be celibate has ALWAYS been found to be a predator.

All of them. This is not my opinion. This is factual knowledge from my wife, and her friends, one of which puts pedophiles in prison.

You've created a fallacy there. KNOWN pedophiles. You only KNOW of them when they act. How on earth would you know otherwise? They aren't tattooed or marked or act bizarrely. If they don't act on it and get caught NO ONE KNOWS. So you really have no idea how many there are that don't act on it (or worse act on it and don't get caught).

YOURS is opinion. Poorly informed opinion at that.

No. I think it's being logical. If a pedo does not act on it, we have no way of knowing and we have no way of knowing how many don't act on it. At any rate...is it relevant? What matters is those who DO and catching them.

but only one wants to fuck little kids,,,

youre a sick bitch,,,

Are you accusing me of pedo? Because your reply doesn't take much sense in the context of the conversation here.

 

[Coyote]

The Gay Pressure group, NAMBLA, is a powerful lobby in liberal states like California. If you don't think that Child Molestation of boys should be glorified, you have to get rid of politicians that are beholden to NAMBLA.

You have got to be KIDDING...you are right?

How exactly can a tiny group (who...in its heyday around 1991 numbered only around 1,100) be a pressure group?

I suspect it's a rightwing bogeyman group more useful for propagating fear of the "gay agenda" than any real world applications.

the OP topic kinda proves you wrong doesnt it???

its happening right in front of you,,,

I think you kind of miss a lot here, but that's ok.

NAMBLA has nothing to do with anything here.

The Bill is to make the law consistent - i.e. it is the same regardless of whether it is male/female or male/male (or presumably female/female but that is pretty rare). CONSISTENT.

Now, that said there is a real issue....but it's not with this bill....I'll give you a chance to guess what it is

while youre trying to put the focus on NAMBLA its their ideology thats trying to be put into legislation,,

so you can go ahead and say its not happening, we can clearly see their goals are being pushed on us,,,

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

What say you?

I believe the adult was 24 and the child was 14... that's the problem.

If you can't recognize that leave the goddamn thread.

I believe you didn't read my response in your knee jerk reaction.

"I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference."

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

But gay pedos are far more sinister and evil than regular pedos.....

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The Gay Pressure group, NAMBLA, is a powerful lobby in liberal states like California. If you don't think that Child Molestation of boys should be glorified, you have to get rid of politicians that are beholden to NAMBLA.

You have got to be KIDDING...you are right?

How exactly can a tiny group (who...in its heyday around 1991 numbered only around 1,100) be a pressure group?

I suspect it's a rightwing bogeyman group more useful for propagating fear of the "gay agenda" than any real world applications.

the OP topic kinda proves you wrong doesnt it???

its happening right in front of you,,,

I think you kind of miss a lot here, but that's ok.

NAMBLA has nothing to do with anything here.

The Bill is to make the law consistent - i.e. it is the same regardless of whether it is male/female or male/male (or presumably female/female but that is pretty rare). CONSISTENT.

Now, that said there is a real issue....but it's not with this bill....I'll give you a chance to guess what it is

while youre trying to put the focus on NAMBLA its their ideology thats trying to be put into legislation,,

so you can go ahead and say its not happening, we can clearly see their goals are being pushed on us,,,

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

What say you?

I believe the adult was 24 and the child was 14... that's the problem.

If you can't recognize that leave the goddamn thread.

I believe you didn't read my response in your knee jerk reaction.

"I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference."

A 24 having sex with a 14 year old is wrong,no?

Let's play

You go first and you focus on 24/14...then I'll crush you and your nonsense.

Go for it

 

[Coyote]

The Gay Pressure group, NAMBLA, is a powerful lobby in liberal states like California. If you don't think that Child Molestation of boys should be glorified, you have to get rid of politicians that are beholden to NAMBLA.

You have got to be KIDDING...you are right?

How exactly can a tiny group (who...in its heyday around 1991 numbered only around 1,100) be a pressure group?

I suspect it's a rightwing bogeyman group more useful for propagating fear of the "gay agenda" than any real world applications.

the OP topic kinda proves you wrong doesnt it???

its happening right in front of you,,,

I think you kind of miss a lot here, but that's ok.

NAMBLA has nothing to do with anything here.

The Bill is to make the law consistent - i.e. it is the same regardless of whether it is male/female or male/male (or presumably female/female but that is pretty rare). CONSISTENT.

Now, that said there is a real issue....but it's not with this bill....I'll give you a chance to guess what it is

while youre trying to put the focus on NAMBLA its their ideology thats trying to be put into legislation,,

so you can go ahead and say its not happening, we can clearly see their goals are being pushed on us,,,

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

What say you?

I believe the adult was 24 and the child was 14... that's the problem.

If you can't recognize that leave the goddamn thread.

I believe you didn't read my response in your knee jerk reaction.

"I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference."

A 24 having sex with a 14 year old is wrong,no?

Let's play

You go first and you focus on 24/14...then I'll crush you and your nonsense.

Go for it

Let's start from the beginning AGAIN.

This is my post, from above, that you responded to.

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

Translation: A 14 yr old and a 24 yr old is WRONG.

 

[jc456]

it's what they enjoy. why do you think Hollywood is so full of em?

 

[jc456]

The Gay Pressure group, NAMBLA, is a powerful lobby in liberal states like California. If you don't think that Child Molestation of boys should be glorified, you have to get rid of politicians that are beholden to NAMBLA.

You have got to be KIDDING...you are right?

How exactly can a tiny group (who...in its heyday around 1991 numbered only around 1,100) be a pressure group?

I suspect it's a rightwing bogeyman group more useful for propagating fear of the "gay agenda" than any real world applications.

the OP topic kinda proves you wrong doesnt it???

its happening right in front of you,,,

I think you kind of miss a lot here, but that's ok.

NAMBLA has nothing to do with anything here.

The Bill is to make the law consistent - i.e. it is the same regardless of whether it is male/female or male/male (or presumably female/female but that is pretty rare). CONSISTENT.

Now, that said there is a real issue....but it's not with this bill....I'll give you a chance to guess what it is

while youre trying to put the focus on NAMBLA its their ideology thats trying to be put into legislation,,

so you can go ahead and say its not happening, we can clearly see their goals are being pushed on us,,,

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

What say you?

I believe the adult was 24 and the child was 14... that's the problem.

If you can't recognize that leave the goddamn thread.

I believe you didn't read my response in your knee jerk reaction.

"I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference."

A 24 having sex with a 14 year old is wrong,no?

Let's play

You go first and you focus on 24/14...then I'll crush you and your nonsense.

Go for it

so the talking points are out to justify their sickness and vile behavior I see. Anyone condoning this is a pedophile.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The Gay Pressure group, NAMBLA, is a powerful lobby in liberal states like California. If you don't think that Child Molestation of boys should be glorified, you have to get rid of politicians that are beholden to NAMBLA.

You have got to be KIDDING...you are right?

How exactly can a tiny group (who...in its heyday around 1991 numbered only around 1,100) be a pressure group?

I suspect it's a rightwing bogeyman group more useful for propagating fear of the "gay agenda" than any real world applications.

the OP topic kinda proves you wrong doesnt it???

its happening right in front of you,,,

I think you kind of miss a lot here, but that's ok.

NAMBLA has nothing to do with anything here.

The Bill is to make the law consistent - i.e. it is the same regardless of whether it is male/female or male/male (or presumably female/female but that is pretty rare). CONSISTENT.

Now, that said there is a real issue....but it's not with this bill....I'll give you a chance to guess what it is

while youre trying to put the focus on NAMBLA its their ideology thats trying to be put into legislation,,

so you can go ahead and say its not happening, we can clearly see their goals are being pushed on us,,,

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

What say you?

I believe the adult was 24 and the child was 14... that's the problem.

If you can't recognize that leave the goddamn thread.

I believe you didn't read my response in your knee jerk reaction.

"I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference."

A 24 having sex with a 14 year old is wrong,no?

Let's play

You go first and you focus on 24/14...then I'll crush you and your nonsense.

Go for it

Let's start from the beginning AGAIN.

This is my post, from above, that you responded to.

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

Translation: A 14 yr old and a 24 yr old is WRONG.

That's the thread issue, YOU have been all over the map avoiding it.

Everyone sees it.

Goddamn loon

 

[Coyote]

The Gay Pressure group, NAMBLA, is a powerful lobby in liberal states like California. If you don't think that Child Molestation of boys should be glorified, you have to get rid of politicians that are beholden to NAMBLA.

You have got to be KIDDING...you are right?

How exactly can a tiny group (who...in its heyday around 1991 numbered only around 1,100) be a pressure group?

I suspect it's a rightwing bogeyman group more useful for propagating fear of the "gay agenda" than any real world applications.

the OP topic kinda proves you wrong doesnt it???

its happening right in front of you,,,

I think you kind of miss a lot here, but that's ok.

NAMBLA has nothing to do with anything here.

The Bill is to make the law consistent - i.e. it is the same regardless of whether it is male/female or male/male (or presumably female/female but that is pretty rare). CONSISTENT.

Now, that said there is a real issue....but it's not with this bill....I'll give you a chance to guess what it is

while youre trying to put the focus on NAMBLA its their ideology thats trying to be put into legislation,,

so you can go ahead and say its not happening, we can clearly see their goals are being pushed on us,,,

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

What say you?

I believe the adult was 24 and the child was 14... that's the problem.

If you can't recognize that leave the goddamn thread.

I believe you didn't read my response in your knee jerk reaction.

"I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference."

A 24 having sex with a 14 year old is wrong,no?

Let's play

You go first and you focus on 24/14...then I'll crush you and your nonsense.

Go for it

so the talking points are out to justify their sickness and vile behavior I see. Anyone condoning this is a pedophile.

Surprisingly, it IS legal to marry a 14 yr old in 10 states which have no marriage age by statute. And in two states: Alaska and NC the minimum age is 14. I have to to admit I was surprised to find that there could be no minimum age.

States with no statutory minimum age are:
CA, MI, OK, MA, MS, NM, RI, WA, WV, WY

14 is WAY too young in today's age. 16 is too young. And a 24 yr old with a 14 year old, seems almost like grooming.

 

[progressive hunter]

The Gay Pressure group, NAMBLA, is a powerful lobby in liberal states like California. If you don't think that Child Molestation of boys should be glorified, you have to get rid of politicians that are beholden to NAMBLA.

You have got to be KIDDING...you are right?

How exactly can a tiny group (who...in its heyday around 1991 numbered only around 1,100) be a pressure group?

I suspect it's a rightwing bogeyman group more useful for propagating fear of the "gay agenda" than any real world applications.

the OP topic kinda proves you wrong doesnt it???

its happening right in front of you,,,

I think you kind of miss a lot here, but that's ok.

NAMBLA has nothing to do with anything here.

The Bill is to make the law consistent - i.e. it is the same regardless of whether it is male/female or male/male (or presumably female/female but that is pretty rare). CONSISTENT.

Now, that said there is a real issue....but it's not with this bill....I'll give you a chance to guess what it is

while youre trying to put the focus on NAMBLA its their ideology thats trying to be put into legislation,,

so you can go ahead and say its not happening, we can clearly see their goals are being pushed on us,,,

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

What say you?

I believe the adult was 24 and the child was 14... that's the problem.

If you can't recognize that leave the goddamn thread.

I believe you didn't read my response in your knee jerk reaction.

"I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference."

DUH!!!

we can add and subtract,,,

 

[Coyote]

The Gay Pressure group, NAMBLA, is a powerful lobby in liberal states like California. If you don't think that Child Molestation of boys should be glorified, you have to get rid of politicians that are beholden to NAMBLA.

You have got to be KIDDING...you are right?

How exactly can a tiny group (who...in its heyday around 1991 numbered only around 1,100) be a pressure group?

I suspect it's a rightwing bogeyman group more useful for propagating fear of the "gay agenda" than any real world applications.

the OP topic kinda proves you wrong doesnt it???

its happening right in front of you,,,

I think you kind of miss a lot here, but that's ok.

NAMBLA has nothing to do with anything here.

The Bill is to make the law consistent - i.e. it is the same regardless of whether it is male/female or male/male (or presumably female/female but that is pretty rare). CONSISTENT.

Now, that said there is a real issue....but it's not with this bill....I'll give you a chance to guess what it is

while youre trying to put the focus on NAMBLA its their ideology thats trying to be put into legislation,,

so you can go ahead and say its not happening, we can clearly see their goals are being pushed on us,,,

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

What say you?

I believe the adult was 24 and the child was 14... that's the problem.

If you can't recognize that leave the goddamn thread.

I believe you didn't read my response in your knee jerk reaction.

"I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference."

A 24 having sex with a 14 year old is wrong,no?

Let's play

You go first and you focus on 24/14...then I'll crush you and your nonsense.

Go for it

Let's start from the beginning AGAIN.

This is my post, from above, that you responded to.

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

Translation: A 14 yr old and a 24 yr old is WRONG.

That's the thread issue, YOU have been all over the map avoiding it.

Everyone sees it.

Goddamn loon

So in other words, you are flailing around because you DID NOT READ my post. If you had, you would realize we are on the same page here.

 

[progressive hunter]

The Gay Pressure group, NAMBLA, is a powerful lobby in liberal states like California. If you don't think that Child Molestation of boys should be glorified, you have to get rid of politicians that are beholden to NAMBLA.

You have got to be KIDDING...you are right?

How exactly can a tiny group (who...in its heyday around 1991 numbered only around 1,100) be a pressure group?

I suspect it's a rightwing bogeyman group more useful for propagating fear of the "gay agenda" than any real world applications.

the OP topic kinda proves you wrong doesnt it???

its happening right in front of you,,,

I think you kind of miss a lot here, but that's ok.

NAMBLA has nothing to do with anything here.

The Bill is to make the law consistent - i.e. it is the same regardless of whether it is male/female or male/male (or presumably female/female but that is pretty rare). CONSISTENT.

Now, that said there is a real issue....but it's not with this bill....I'll give you a chance to guess what it is

while youre trying to put the focus on NAMBLA its their ideology thats trying to be put into legislation,,

so you can go ahead and say its not happening, we can clearly see their goals are being pushed on us,,,

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

What say you?

I believe the adult was 24 and the child was 14... that's the problem.

If you can't recognize that leave the goddamn thread.

I believe you didn't read my response in your knee jerk reaction.

"I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference."

A 24 having sex with a 14 year old is wrong,no?

Let's play

You go first and you focus on 24/14...then I'll crush you and your nonsense.

Go for it

so the talking points are out to justify their sickness and vile behavior I see. Anyone condoning this is a pedophile.

Surprisingly, it IS legal to marry a 14 yr old in 10 states which have no marriage age by statute. And in two states: Alaska and NC the minimum age is 14. I have to to admit I was surprised to find that there could be no minimum age.

States with no statutory minimum age are:
CA, MI, OK, MA, MS, NM, RI, WA, WV, WY

14 is WAY too young in today's age. 16 is too young. And a 24 yr old with a 14 year old, seems almost like grooming.

you should really look things up before you post,,,



18 years

No blood test or physical exam is required. Residents and nonresidents are eligible to apply for a marriage license. Both parties must be 18 years of age or older to marry without parental consent. A birth certificate may be required to show proof of age.

Marriage Licenses - Alaska Department of Health and Social ...
dhss.alaska.gov › dph › VitalStats › Pages › marriagel

 

[Coyote]

The Gay Pressure group, NAMBLA, is a powerful lobby in liberal states like California. If you don't think that Child Molestation of boys should be glorified, you have to get rid of politicians that are beholden to NAMBLA.

You have got to be KIDDING...you are right?

How exactly can a tiny group (who...in its heyday around 1991 numbered only around 1,100) be a pressure group?

I suspect it's a rightwing bogeyman group more useful for propagating fear of the "gay agenda" than any real world applications.

the OP topic kinda proves you wrong doesnt it???

its happening right in front of you,,,

I think you kind of miss a lot here, but that's ok.

NAMBLA has nothing to do with anything here.

The Bill is to make the law consistent - i.e. it is the same regardless of whether it is male/female or male/male (or presumably female/female but that is pretty rare). CONSISTENT.

Now, that said there is a real issue....but it's not with this bill....I'll give you a chance to guess what it is

while youre trying to put the focus on NAMBLA its their ideology thats trying to be put into legislation,,

so you can go ahead and say its not happening, we can clearly see their goals are being pushed on us,,,

umh dude...I wasn't the one who brought up NAMBLA was I? So...what do YOU think is the real problem here?

I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference.

What say you?

I believe the adult was 24 and the child was 14... that's the problem.

If you can't recognize that leave the goddamn thread.

I believe you didn't read my response in your knee jerk reaction.

"I can tell you what I think it is: a ten year age difference."

DUH!!!

we can add and subtract,,,

Cool. Don't know about this "we" bit, but glad to see you at least passed 2nd grade math at some point in your career. So I'm curious. Do you think the issue of a ten year difference is only important when it applies to homosexuals or do you, like normal people, think ten years is a too big gap when it's between a teen and a 20 something? Kind of shocking to see that there is NO minimum age in ten states.

 

[Dick Foster]

So this queer State Senator in San Francisco wants to remove 24 year old men who have sex (rape) 14 year old boys, because the current law is “unfair” to gays, and is more lenient towards straight men who have sex with underaged girls.
Hey homo, how about changing the law so heterosexual men having sex with underaged girls is illegal and such individuals should be put on a sex offender list. But no, he has to push his pedo Agenda.

Wiener’s SB145 would create parity by giving judges discretion over sex-offender registration in all cases involving voluntary intercourse between teenagers ages 14 to 17, who cannot legally consent, and adults who are less than 10 years older.

“California’s sex offender registry continues to draw that distinction — an antiquated, outdated, leftover distinction — that somehow oral sex is worse than vaginal sex,” Wiener said.

Scott Wiener tries to salvage bill fixing sex-offender list’s inequity toward gay people

State Sen. Scott Wiener is mobilizing allies to help revive a bill in the final weeks of...

www.sfchronicle.com

The bill:

Bill Text - SB-145 Sex offenders: registration.

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Here’s the homo pushing this shit:

San Francisco values:

I suppose people in hell want ice water too.
Tell ya what he's a deal for the fuckin faggot perverts. We'll take thier names off the list by standing them up against a wall and blowing their shit away. How's that for a deal?