New California law allows sex offenders to be removed from registery

[MindWars]

New California law allows sex offenders to be removed from registry

From SF Gate: Ninety percent of California sex offenders will no longer be required to register with law enforcement for life under a bill that Gov. Jerry Brown signed Friday. The change is one of several sweeping alterations to the state’s 70-year-old registry contained in SB384 by Sen. Scott Wiener (read about his background here), D-San Francisco.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And for the real retards who can only use a source as their denial of truth deny this morons
it's on the SF news site too.

New California law allows sex offenders to be removed from registry

We keep telling you leftist morons they have been using the GAY/ Tranny laws as a stepping stone to legalize child molesters and here we go, this is the next stepping stone. Are you leftist fks seriously that stupid you can't see where this all has been leading to.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

California loves them their sex offenders, especially where children have been victims. Pedophiles can no longer be denied employment at daycare centers, as clowns at children's birthday parties and can no longer be denied the right to hang out at playgrounds.

 

[MindWars]

Truthfully this bs doesn't work anyway if someone wants to get a hold of your kid they're going to.
The best 100% sure fire way to protect your kid is stop being a leftist moron expecting the Gov. to watch and protect your pathetic asses and teach your kid to BEAT THE FK OUT OF ANYONE who tries touching them .

 

[Coyote]

That could be a good thing. People get put on the list for any sex offense...even statutory rape. It ruins their lives forever. It should be reserved for the worst offenders, the truly dangerous.

 

[Coyote]

From the actual bill:


Senate Bill No. 384
CHAPTER 541

An act to amend Sections 9002 and 13125 of, and to amend, repeal, and add Sections 290, 290.006, 290.008, 290.45, 290.46, 290.5, and 4852.03 of, the Penal Code, relating to sex offenders.

[ Approved by Governor October 06, 2017. Filed with Secretary of State October 06, 2017. ]

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

SB 384, Wiener. Sex offenders: registration: criminal offender record information systems.
Existing law requires persons convicted of specified sex offenses and certain acts of human trafficking for purposes of committing various sex offenses or extortion, as specified, or attempts to commit those offenses, to register with local law enforcement agencies while residing in the state or while attending school or working in the state. Willful failure to register, as required, is a misdemeanor, or a felony, depending on the underlying offense.
Existing law requires the Department of Justice to make available to the public information concerning registered sex offenders on an Internet Web site, as specified. Existing law requires that information to include, among other things, whether the offender was subsequently incarcerated for another felony. Existing law also authorizes a person to file an application for exclusion from the Internet Web site and establishes the requirements for exclusion.
This bill would, commencing January 1, 2021, instead establish 3 tiers of registration based on specified criteria, for periods of at least 10 years, at least 20 years, and life, respectively, for a conviction of specified sex offenses, and 5 years and 10 years for tiers one and two, respectively, for an adjudication as a ward of the juvenile court for specified sex offenses, as specified. The bill would allow the Department of Justice to place a person in a tier-to-be-determined category for a maximum period of 24 months if his or her appropriate tier designation cannot be immediately ascertained. The bill would, commencing July 1, 2021, establish procedures for termination from the sex offender registry for a registered sex offender who is a tier one or tier two offender and who completes his or her mandated minimum registration period under specified conditions. The bill would require the offender to file a petition at the expiration of his or her minimum registration period and would authorize the district attorney to request a hearing on the petition if the petitioner has not fulfilled the requirement of successful tier completion, as specified. The bill would establish procedures for a person required to register as a tier three offender based solely on his or her risk level to petition the court for termination from the registry after 20 years from release of custody, if certain criteria are met. The bill would also, commencing January 1, 2022, revise the criteria for exclusion from the Internet Web site.
Existing law requires all basic information stored in state or local criminal offender record information systems to be recorded in the form of specified data elements, including the disposition of the offense.
This bill would require that information to include sentence enhancement data elements.
Existing law establishes the Sex Offender Management Board within the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Existing law requires the board to address issues, concerns, and problems related to the community management of adult sex offenders.
This bill would instead require the board to address any issues, concerns, and problems related to the community management of all sex offenders.
This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 290 of the Penal Code proposed by AB 484 to be operative as specified.
DIGEST KEY
Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: no
BILL TEXT
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

 

[Tax Man]

You do know that just pissing behind a tree and getting a citation puts you on the sex offenders list?

 

[MindWars]

That could be a good thing. People get put on the list for any sex offense...even statutory rape. It ruins their lives forever. It should be reserved for the worst offenders, the truly dangerous.

I tend to lean towards agreeing with you for one big reason.
There are multiple cases in fact it's an epidemic where young men who are lets say 18yrs old have a gf of 16 or 17 they both have consensual sex, the parents find out do not like it and then they turn around bringing charges upon the boy.
My gawd the kid suffers as you mention the rest of their lives for sex that was agreed upon by both sides.

I think the register list is PURE BS and a DEMOCRATIC fk reason to get voted in using once again the fake lines of " SAVE THE CHILDREN" bs the only ones who are gonna save the kids are parents who don't live in lala land.

 

[MindWars]

You do know that just pissing behind a tree and getting a citation puts you on the sex offenders list?

but wait you can show first graders how to fist and it's not perverted by any means LOL.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

California loves them their sex offenders, especially where children have been victims. Pedophiles can no longer be denied employment at daycare centers, as clowns at children's birthday parties and can no longer be denied the right to hang out at playgrounds.

Indeed.we are for sure living in dangerous times with dangerous criminal politicians running the country.

 

[S.J.]

Pedophiles aren't the only ones on the sex offender registry. If you urinate in the bushes because you're not near a restroom and a cop catches you, he can charge you with indecent exposure which can land you on the list if you don't have a good attorney. It's better if we use the resources to track the pedophiles and rapists instead, since they are the dangerous ones. Why waste manpower and money tracking somebody who isn't a threat to anyone? It makes no sense. Normally a liberal would not sign a bill that reduces governments ability to control someone and their movements but since Governor Moonbeam gets a good amount of his support from perverts, oddballs, and weirdos, it makes sense he would do it.

 

[MindWars]

Pedophiles aren't the only ones on the sex offender registry. If you urinate in the bushes because you're not near a restroom and a cop catches you, he can charge you with indecent exposure which can land you on the list if you don't have a good attorney. It's better if we use the resources to track the pedophiles and rapists instead, since they are the dangerous ones. Why waste manpower and money tracking somebody who isn't a threat to anyone? It makes no sense. Normally a liberal would not sign a bill that reduces governments ability to control someone and their movements but since Governor Moonbeam gets a good amount of his support from perverts, oddballs, and weirdos, it makes sense he would do it.

That is partly why I wrote what I did above. There are far to many people on the sex list than should be.
Some get put on there and really there was never any proof whatsoever that anyone did such things such as rape or molest etc. Some cases all it was , was a she said so end of story hands down now you are a rapist.

This bs should be stripped away Nationwide if you ask me. With exceptions of hard core proof pictures, video or a parent actually catching them. And even with those suggestions we still have to have doubts because of the following.................. 1. anyone can manipulate a video or photo today and do it well, 2. A parent can still just say a guy did this or that to their kid .
As well as coach the kid into saying he did such thing just to keep custody or to be a vindictive prick. There have been cases of such already.

 

[Coyote]

That could be a good thing. People get put on the list for any sex offense...even statutory rape. It ruins their lives forever. It should be reserved for the worst offenders, the truly dangerous.

I tend to lean towards agreeing with you for one big reason.
There are multiple cases in fact it's an epidemic where young men who are lets say 18yrs old have a gf of 16 or 17 they both have consensual sex, the parents find out do not like it and then they turn around bringing charges upon the boy.
My gawd the kid suffers as you mention the rest of their lives for sex that was agreed upon by both sides.

I think the register list is PURE BS and a DEMOCRATIC fk reason to get voted in using once again the fake lines of " SAVE THE CHILDREN" bs the only ones who are gonna save the kids are parents who don't live in lala land.

Exactly and it is for that reason I have serious reservations about those lists. IMO it should be for repeat violent offenders or child offenders or those who's crimes were particularly horrific.