Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
First Bush the man the left loves to insult was able to what Obama couldn't get a SOFA agreement with Maliki how is that possible? Let's look at it before he became President Obama candidate Obama made it clear if he was elected he would get out of Iraq he opposed and voted against the Iraq war fine that was his right he also opposed the surge strategy also his right as a candidate for President he consistently called Iraq the wrong war the unnecessary war and repeated his pledge to get out does anyone notice the Obama pattern here? This brings us back to the question how was Bush able to get a SOFA agreement with Maliki while Obama couldn't when you look at Obama's past stands on Iraq the answer is very simple he never really wanted one.Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?
Just what bargaining power did Bush have that Obama didn't? Making a claim and not backing it with proof is the definition of partisan stupidity shitting bull. Bush didn't allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law either and got an agreement so what power or leverage did Bush have with Maliki that Obama didn't?First Bush the man the left loves to insult was able to what Obama couldn't get a SOFA agreement with Maliki how is that possible? Let's look at it before he became President Obama candidate Obama made it clear if he was elected he would get out of Iraq he opposed and voted against the Iraq war fine that was his right he also opposed the surge strategy also his right as a candidate for President he consistently called Iraq the wrong war the unnecessary war and repeated his pledge to get out does anyone notice the Obama pattern here? This brings us back to the question how was Bush able to get a SOFA agreement with Maliki while Obama couldn't when you look at Obama's past stands on Iraq the answer is very simple he never really wanted one.Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?
Maybe you should consider the bargaining power that Bush had with Maliki when the original SOFA was negotiated. When the Bush SOFA was nearing expiration - Obama no longer had such bargaining power. Obama refused to allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law - so Maliki said to leave when the SOFA expired. Are you really that stupid - or just that partisan? It ain't rocket science.
This has been hashed over and over. Virtually every former official in Obama's administration says the same thing: Obama had the opportunity to leave troops behind but choise to cut and run to satisfy his domestic base, against the advice of foreign policy professionals.He isn't.Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?
Obama is blamed for Obama's incompetence. What part of that do you not get?
How was Obama incompetent regarding Iraq? Please be specific - with "credible" proof.
You keep repeating this hoping it's true.First Bush the man the left loves to insult was able to what Obama couldn't get a SOFA agreement with Maliki how is that possible? Let's look at it before he became President Obama candidate Obama made it clear if he was elected he would get out of Iraq he opposed and voted against the Iraq war fine that was his right he also opposed the surge strategy also his right as a candidate for President he consistently called Iraq the wrong war the unnecessary war and repeated his pledge to get out does anyone notice the Obama pattern here? This brings us back to the question how was Bush able to get a SOFA agreement with Maliki while Obama couldn't when you look at Obama's past stands on Iraq the answer is very simple he never really wanted one.Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?
Maybe you should consider the bargaining power that Bush had with Maliki when the original SOFA was negotiated. When the Bush SOFA was nearing expiration - Obama no longer had such bargaining power. Obama refused to allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law - so Maliki said to leave when the SOFA expired. Are you really that stupid - or just that partisan? It ain't rocket science.
By the end Bush was a lame duck president with a terrible approval rating. Obama came in with star power. Fauxcota's point is meaningless.Just what bargaining power did Bush have that Obama didn't? Making a claim and not backing it with proof is the definition of partisan stupidity shitting bull. Bush didn't allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law either and got an agreement so what power or leverage did Bush have with Maliki that Obama didn't?First Bush the man the left loves to insult was able to what Obama couldn't get a SOFA agreement with Maliki how is that possible? Let's look at it before he became President Obama candidate Obama made it clear if he was elected he would get out of Iraq he opposed and voted against the Iraq war fine that was his right he also opposed the surge strategy also his right as a candidate for President he consistently called Iraq the wrong war the unnecessary war and repeated his pledge to get out does anyone notice the Obama pattern here? This brings us back to the question how was Bush able to get a SOFA agreement with Maliki while Obama couldn't when you look at Obama's past stands on Iraq the answer is very simple he never really wanted one.Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?
Maybe you should consider the bargaining power that Bush had with Maliki when the original SOFA was negotiated. When the Bush SOFA was nearing expiration - Obama no longer had such bargaining power. Obama refused to allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law - so Maliki said to leave when the SOFA expired. Are you really that stupid - or just that partisan? It ain't rocket science.
By the end Bush was a lame duck president with a terrible approval rating. Obama came in with star power. Fauxcota's point is meaningless.Just what bargaining power did Bush have that Obama didn't? Making a claim and not backing it with proof is the definition of partisan stupidity shitting bull. Bush didn't allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law either and got an agreement so what power or leverage did Bush have with Maliki that Obama didn't?First Bush the man the left loves to insult was able to what Obama couldn't get a SOFA agreement with Maliki how is that possible? Let's look at it before he became President Obama candidate Obama made it clear if he was elected he would get out of Iraq he opposed and voted against the Iraq war fine that was his right he also opposed the surge strategy also his right as a candidate for President he consistently called Iraq the wrong war the unnecessary war and repeated his pledge to get out does anyone notice the Obama pattern here? This brings us back to the question how was Bush able to get a SOFA agreement with Maliki while Obama couldn't when you look at Obama's past stands on Iraq the answer is very simple he never really wanted one.Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?
Maybe you should consider the bargaining power that Bush had with Maliki when the original SOFA was negotiated. When the Bush SOFA was nearing expiration - Obama no longer had such bargaining power. Obama refused to allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law - so Maliki said to leave when the SOFA expired. Are you really that stupid - or just that partisan? It ain't rocket science.
Translation: I have nothing so I'll throw some meaningless garbage.By the end Bush was a lame duck president with a terrible approval rating. Obama came in with star power. Fauxcota's point is meaningless.Just what bargaining power did Bush have that Obama didn't? Making a claim and not backing it with proof is the definition of partisan stupidity shitting bull. Bush didn't allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law either and got an agreement so what power or leverage did Bush have with Maliki that Obama didn't?First Bush the man the left loves to insult was able to what Obama couldn't get a SOFA agreement with Maliki how is that possible? Let's look at it before he became President Obama candidate Obama made it clear if he was elected he would get out of Iraq he opposed and voted against the Iraq war fine that was his right he also opposed the surge strategy also his right as a candidate for President he consistently called Iraq the wrong war the unnecessary war and repeated his pledge to get out does anyone notice the Obama pattern here? This brings us back to the question how was Bush able to get a SOFA agreement with Maliki while Obama couldn't when you look at Obama's past stands on Iraq the answer is very simple he never really wanted one.Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?
Maybe you should consider the bargaining power that Bush had with Maliki when the original SOFA was negotiated. When the Bush SOFA was nearing expiration - Obama no longer had such bargaining power. Obama refused to allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law - so Maliki said to leave when the SOFA expired. Are you really that stupid - or just that partisan? It ain't rocket science.
In other words - you got nothing. Thanks for playing...
Translation: I have nothing so I'll throw some meaningless garbage.By the end Bush was a lame duck president with a terrible approval rating. Obama came in with star power. Fauxcota's point is meaningless.Just what bargaining power did Bush have that Obama didn't? Making a claim and not backing it with proof is the definition of partisan stupidity shitting bull. Bush didn't allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law either and got an agreement so what power or leverage did Bush have with Maliki that Obama didn't?First Bush the man the left loves to insult was able to what Obama couldn't get a SOFA agreement with Maliki how is that possible? Let's look at it before he became President Obama candidate Obama made it clear if he was elected he would get out of Iraq he opposed and voted against the Iraq war fine that was his right he also opposed the surge strategy also his right as a candidate for President he consistently called Iraq the wrong war the unnecessary war and repeated his pledge to get out does anyone notice the Obama pattern here? This brings us back to the question how was Bush able to get a SOFA agreement with Maliki while Obama couldn't when you look at Obama's past stands on Iraq the answer is very simple he never really wanted one.
Maybe you should consider the bargaining power that Bush had with Maliki when the original SOFA was negotiated. When the Bush SOFA was nearing expiration - Obama no longer had such bargaining power. Obama refused to allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law - so Maliki said to leave when the SOFA expired. Are you really that stupid - or just that partisan? It ain't rocket science.
In other words - you got nothing. Thanks for playing...
Thank you.
Actually, no. fuck you. Bush was the greatest president of the 21st century Obama is the greatest clown of the 21st century. Bush accomplished a huge amount. Obama fucked up a huge amount. Bush took responsibility for things. Obama blames people for his own mistakes.
That is clear to the majority of people in this country. Others like you take a while for it to sink in.
IOW, you've got nothing but insults.Translation: I have nothing so I'll throw some meaningless garbage.By the end Bush was a lame duck president with a terrible approval rating. Obama came in with star power. Fauxcota's point is meaningless.Just what bargaining power did Bush have that Obama didn't? Making a claim and not backing it with proof is the definition of partisan stupidity shitting bull. Bush didn't allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law either and got an agreement so what power or leverage did Bush have with Maliki that Obama didn't?Maybe you should consider the bargaining power that Bush had with Maliki when the original SOFA was negotiated. When the Bush SOFA was nearing expiration - Obama no longer had such bargaining power. Obama refused to allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law - so Maliki said to leave when the SOFA expired. Are you really that stupid - or just that partisan? It ain't rocket science.
In other words - you got nothing. Thanks for playing...
Thank you.
Actually, no. fuck you. Bush was the greatest president of the 21st century Obama is the greatest clown of the 21st century. Bush accomplished a huge amount. Obama fucked up a huge amount. Bush took responsibility for things. Obama blames people for his own mistakes.
That is clear to the majority of people in this country. Others like you take a while for it to sink in.
Wow, that is insanely retarded. I assume you were either homeskooled or rode the short bus.
IOW, you've got nothing but insults.Translation: I have nothing so I'll throw some meaningless garbage.By the end Bush was a lame duck president with a terrible approval rating. Obama came in with star power. Fauxcota's point is meaningless.Just what bargaining power did Bush have that Obama didn't? Making a claim and not backing it with proof is the definition of partisan stupidity shitting bull. Bush didn't allow American troops to be subject to Iraqi law either and got an agreement so what power or leverage did Bush have with Maliki that Obama didn't?
In other words - you got nothing. Thanks for playing...
Thank you.
Actually, no. fuck you. Bush was the greatest president of the 21st century Obama is the greatest clown of the 21st century. Bush accomplished a huge amount. Obama fucked up a huge amount. Bush took responsibility for things. Obama blames people for his own mistakes.
That is clear to the majority of people in this country. Others like you take a while for it to sink in.
Wow, that is insanely retarded. I assume you were either homeskooled or rode the short bus.
Remind us how you mopped floors on the NYSE again. That was a classic.
Translation: You're much too smart for me to try.IOW, you've got nothing but insults.Translation: I have nothing so I'll throw some meaningless garbage.By the end Bush was a lame duck president with a terrible approval rating. Obama came in with star power. Fauxcota's point is meaningless.
In other words - you got nothing. Thanks for playing...
Thank you.
Actually, no. fuck you. Bush was the greatest president of the 21st century Obama is the greatest clown of the 21st century. Bush accomplished a huge amount. Obama fucked up a huge amount. Bush took responsibility for things. Obama blames people for his own mistakes.
That is clear to the majority of people in this country. Others like you take a while for it to sink in.
Wow, that is insanely retarded. I assume you were either homeskooled or rode the short bus.
Remind us how you mopped floors on the NYSE again. That was a classic.
I'm sorry, Rabbit, but you're just too dumb to play with.
Lakota you dog you, the rabbi is spanking ya.IOW, you've got nothing but insults.Translation: I have nothing so I'll throw some meaningless garbage.By the end Bush was a lame duck president with a terrible approval rating. Obama came in with star power. Fauxcota's point is meaningless.
In other words - you got nothing. Thanks for playing...
Thank you.
Actually, no. fuck you. Bush was the greatest president of the 21st century Obama is the greatest clown of the 21st century. Bush accomplished a huge amount. Obama fucked up a huge amount. Bush took responsibility for things. Obama blames people for his own mistakes.
That is clear to the majority of people in this country. Others like you take a while for it to sink in.
Wow, that is insanely retarded. I assume you were either homeskooled or rode the short bus.
Remind us how you mopped floors on the NYSE again. That was a classic.
I'm sorry, Rabbit, but you're just too dumb to play with.
Liberals always admire dictators. Mao, Castro, Chavez, and now Saddam.Lakhota has gone off the deep end.
pro Saddam.
Translation: I've had the ever-living shit kicked out me by conservatives here so I'll post something sort of funny and hope people think I've won.
Yeah, the Rabbit only has a flesh wound.
Translation: You're much too smart for me to try.IOW, you've got nothing but insults.Translation: I have nothing so I'll throw some meaningless garbage.In other words - you got nothing. Thanks for playing...
Thank you.
Actually, no. fuck you. Bush was the greatest president of the 21st century Obama is the greatest clown of the 21st century. Bush accomplished a huge amount. Obama fucked up a huge amount. Bush took responsibility for things. Obama blames people for his own mistakes.
That is clear to the majority of people in this country. Others like you take a while for it to sink in.
Wow, that is insanely retarded. I assume you were either homeskooled or rode the short bus.
Remind us how you mopped floors on the NYSE again. That was a classic.
I'm sorry, Rabbit, but you're just too dumb to play with.
Yeah, you got that right, junior. You've been schooled by this entire board over and over.
Translation: I've had the ever-living shit kicked out me by conservatives here so I'll post something sort of funny and hope people think I've won.
Yeah, the Rabbit only has a flesh wound.
You're simply pathetic.
You NaziCons are a riot. Your fact-free debating is hilarious.
