Saddam's Revenge: Islamic State Reportedly On Baghdad’s Outskirts After Week Of Victories

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
159,300
75,279
2,330
Native America
IRBIL, IRAQ — Islamic State militants have taken control of key cities in Iraq’s western province of Anbar and have begun to besiege one of the country’s largest military bases in a weeklong offensive that’s brought them within artillery range of Baghdad.

The Islamic State and its tribal allies have dominated Anbar since a surprise offensive last December, but this week’s push was particularly worrisome, because for the first time this year Islamist insurgents were reported to have become a major presence in Abu Ghraib, the last Anbar town on the outskirts of the capital.

“Daash is openly operating inside Abu Ghraib,” according to an Iraqi soldier, who used a common Arabic term for the Islamic State. “I was at the 10th Division base there two days ago, and the soldiers cannot leave or patrol,” he said, asking that he be identified only as Hossam because Iraqi soldiers are barred from speaking with foreign reporters. “Daash controls the streets.”

The biggest concern for Western military advisers was the report that Islamic State militants were moving freely in Abu Ghraib, which controls the western approaches to Baghdad from Anbar, Jordan and Syria. Its loss would severely limit the Iraqi government’s ability to send reinforcements to a small number of bases in Anbar that remain in government control, including at Ramadi and Haditha as well as Asad air base, which lies north of Ramadi.

Already, Islamic State forces’ influence stretches from Fallujah through Abu Ghraib to Yusufiya, Baghdad’s westernmost suburb. So far, the highway that links those locations remains in government hands, as does the infamous Abu Ghraib prison, where U.S. soldiers abused Iraqi prisoners in the early years of the Iraq War. But while the government has dispatched more soldiers to reinforce its hold on the highway, the Islamic State’s control of the surrounding areas makes the government’s hold appear tenuous.

“If the Iraqis are unable to regain control of this area, this has the makings of a disaster,” said the Irbil-based coalition diplomat.

More: Islamic State reportedly on Baghdad's outskirts after week of victories - McClatchy DC

Abu Ghraib? Gee, that place sounds familiar.
 
Last edited:
Military Skill and Terrorist Technique Fuel Success of ISIS

BAGHDAD — As fighters for the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria continue to seize territory, the group has quietly built an effective management structure of mostly middle-aged Iraqis overseeing departments of finance, arms, local governance, military operations and recruitment.

At the top the organization is the self-declared leader of all Muslims, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, a radical chief executive officer of sorts, who handpicked many of his deputies from among the men he met while a prisoner in American custody at the Camp Bucca detention center a decade ago.

He had a preference for military men, and so his leadership team includes many officers from Saddam Hussein’s long-disbanded army.

They include former Iraqi officers like Fadel al-Hayali, the top deputy for Iraq, who once served Mr. Hussein as a lieutenant colonel, and Adnan al-Sweidawi, a former lieutenant colonel who now heads the group’s military council.

More: Military Skill and Terrorist Technique Fuel Success of ISIS - The New York Times

We have Bush and Cheney to thank for this mess.
 
How many cities in Iraq did ISIS control when Bush left office?
How much territory in Iraq did ISIS control when Bush left office?
The answer to both is none someone needs to go back to whining about the name Redskins granted that is also highly stupid but not as stupid as threads like this.
 
How many cities in Iraq did ISIS control when Bush left office?
How much territory in Iraq did ISIS control when Bush left office?
The answer to both is none someone needs to go back to whining about the name Redskins granted that is also highly stupid but not as stupid as threads like this.

I can see it upsets you to be reminded of the mess Bush and Cheney made. It upsets many of us.
 
How many cities in Iraq did ISIS control when Bush left office?
How much territory in Iraq did ISIS control when Bush left office?
The answer to both is none someone needs to go back to whining about the name Redskins granted that is also highly stupid but not as stupid as threads like this.

I can see it upsets you to be reminded of the mess Bush and Cheney made. It upsets many of us.
I can see you didn't dispute the answer to either question of course that is typical when you can't making you look dumb would be a lot more fun if you didn't make so easy shitting bull.
 
IRBIL, IRAQ — Islamic State militants have taken control of key cities in Iraq’s western province of Anbar and have begun to besiege one of the country’s largest military bases in a weeklong offensive that’s brought them within artillery range of Baghdad.

The Islamic State and its tribal allies have dominated Anbar since a surprise offensive last December, but this week’s push was particularly worrisome, because for the first time this year Islamist insurgents were reported to have become a major presence in Abu Ghraib, the last Anbar town on the outskirts of the capital.

“Daash is openly operating inside Abu Ghraib,” according to an Iraqi soldier, who used a common Arabic term for the Islamic State. “I was at the 10th Division base there two days ago, and the soldiers cannot leave or patrol,” he said, asking that he be identified only as Hossam because Iraqi soldiers are barred from speaking with foreign reporters. “Daash controls the streets.”

The biggest concern for Western military advisers was the report that Islamic State militants were moving freely in Abu Ghraib, which controls the western approaches to Baghdad from Anbar, Jordan and Syria. Its loss would severely limit the Iraqi government’s ability to send reinforcements to a small number of bases in Anbar that remain in government control, including at Ramadi and Haditha as well as Asad air base, which lies north of Ramadi.

Already, Islamic State forces’ influence stretches from Fallujah through Abu Ghraib to Yusufiya, Baghdad’s westernmost suburb. So far, the highway that links those locations remains in government hands, as does the infamous Abu Ghraib prison, where U.S. soldiers abused Iraqi prisoners in the early years of the Iraq War. But while the government has dispatched more soldiers to reinforce its hold on the highway, the Islamic State’s control of the surrounding areas makes the government’s hold appear tenuous.

“If the Iraqis are unable to regain control of this area, this has the makings of a disaster,” said the Irbil-based coalition diplomat.

More: Islamic State reportedly on Baghdad's outskirts after week of victories - McClatchy DC

Abu Ghraib? Gee, that place sounds familiar.

Military Skill and Terrorist Technique Fuel Success of ISIS

BAGHDAD — As fighters for the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria continue to seize territory, the group has quietly built an effective management structure of mostly middle-aged Iraqis overseeing departments of finance, arms, local governance, military operations and recruitment.

At the top the organization is the self-declared leader of all Muslims, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, a radical chief executive officer of sorts, who handpicked many of his deputies from among the men he met while a prisoner in American custody at the Camp Bucca detention center a decade ago.

He had a preference for military men, and so his leadership team includes many officers from Saddam Hussein’s long-disbanded army.

They include former Iraqi officers like Fadel al-Hayali, the top deputy for Iraq, who once served Mr. Hussein as a lieutenant colonel, and Adnan al-Sweidawi, a former lieutenant colonel who now heads the group’s military council.

More: Military Skill and Terrorist Technique Fuel Success of ISIS - The New York Times

We have Bush and Cheney to thank for this mess.

ShallowLakhota,

First of all, Saddam was a secularist. ISIS is the opposite. Thus, your idiotic title of the thread makes no sense.

Second of all, the Islamic caliphate long pre-dates your enemy, Bush-Cheney. Their jihad goes back thousands of years.

It is merely an argument of convenience to blame Bush. A tired one. An inaccurate one. But a convenient one, nevertheless.

Another OBVIOUS flaw in your logi....I mean, emotion....is that ISIS is killing the very people Bush tried to make free, secularists, Christians, Kurds, etc.... So, your position against Bush and position for ISIS, makes you an enemy, not just of peace loving people around the world, but of your own best interests. But having read your posts, I don't think you are smart enough to understand what I am saying.
 
Saddam got fucked. Now the people who fucked him are getting fucked - including by many of Saddam's former commanders and officers who now fight for ISIS. Hence, Saddam's revenge.
 
Saddam got fucked. Now the people who fucked him are getting fucked - including by many of Saddam's former commanders and officers who now fight for ISIS. Hence, Saddam's revenge.

You really should learn more.

And your lack of perspective leads one to believe you obviously care not at all for humanity.
 
Saddam got fucked. Now the people who fucked him are getting fucked - including by many of Saddam's former commanders and officers who now fight for ISIS. Hence, Saddam's revenge.

You really should learn more.

And your lack of perspective leads one to believe you obviously care not at all for humanity.

Saddam kept the lid on that cesspool of sectarian tribal idiots. If Saddam were still in power - there would be no ISIS in Iraq.
 
Saddam got fucked. Now the people who fucked him are getting fucked - including by many of Saddam's former commanders and officers who now fight for ISIS. Hence, Saddam's revenge.

You really should learn more.

And your lack of perspective leads one to believe you obviously care not at all for humanity.

Saddam kept the lid on that cesspool of sectarian tribal idiots. If Saddam were still in power - there would be no ISIS in Iraq.

Ah, the wonderful magic of revisionist history and hindsight.

You know naught what would have been. Nobody does.

Saddam was an evil bastard. He used WMD on the Kurds (yes, WMD), invaded Kuwait, and oppressed his people, and his sons put the opposition through wood chippers.

But hey, if you think more highly of Saddam than Bush 43, go for it. Expose yourself.

What else ya got???
 
Saddam got fucked. Now the people who fucked him are getting fucked - including by many of Saddam's former commanders and officers who now fight for ISIS. Hence, Saddam's revenge.

You really should learn more.

And your lack of perspective leads one to believe you obviously care not at all for humanity.

Saddam kept the lid on that cesspool of sectarian tribal idiots. If Saddam were still in power - there would be no ISIS in Iraq.

Ah, the wonderful magic of revisionist history and hindsight.

You know naught what would have been. Nobody does.

Saddam was an evil bastard. He used WMD on the Kurds (yes, WMD), invaded Kuwait, and oppressed his people, and his sons put the opposition through wood chippers.

But hey, if you think more highly of Saddam than Bush 43, go for it. Expose yourself.

What else ya got???

Yes, Saddam gassed the Kurds who were actively trying to overthrow him (with gas from Reagan).

Bush 41 Suckered Saddam into invading Kuwait through Ambassador April Glasspie.

Bush 43 conjured up lies to invade Iraq a second time.

Saddam ran a tight ship.

Saddam was a dictator and he died like a man when they lynched him.

How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons

Is the US State Department still keeping April Glaspie under wraps?

The Downing Street Memo
 
Saddam got fucked. Now the people who fucked him are getting fucked - including by many of Saddam's former commanders and officers who now fight for ISIS. Hence, Saddam's revenge.

You really should learn more.

And your lack of perspective leads one to believe you obviously care not at all for humanity.

Saddam kept the lid on that cesspool of sectarian tribal idiots. If Saddam were still in power - there would be no ISIS in Iraq.

Ah, the wonderful magic of revisionist history and hindsight.

You know naught what would have been. Nobody does.

Saddam was an evil bastard. He used WMD on the Kurds (yes, WMD), invaded Kuwait, and oppressed his people, and his sons put the opposition through wood chippers.

But hey, if you think more highly of Saddam than Bush 43, go for it. Expose yourself.

What else ya got???

Yes, Saddam gassed the Kurds who were actively trying to overthrow him (with gas from Reagan).

Bush 41 Suckered Saddam into invading Kuwait through Ambassador April Glasspie.

Bush 43 conjured up lies to invade Iraq a second time.

Saddam ran a tight ship.

Saddam was a dictator and he died like a man when they lynched him.

How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons

Is the US State Department still keeping April Glaspie under wraps?

The Downing Street Memo

I think you are a 10yo with a quick google ability.

No, Saddam did not "gas" the Kurds because they tried to overthrow him.....he used WMD on them because they wanted to remain free. Gosh darn, that freedom thing always gets you libs, doesn't it????

Oh by the way....I thought all you libs were convinced Iraq had no WMD?????

I don't need links to inform me of WMD in Iraq, I was there then and know it intimately.
 

Forum List

Back
Top