Saddam's Revenge: Islamic State Reportedly On Baghdad’s Outskirts After Week Of Victories

[jknowgood]

After ignoring Colin Powell's advice ("you break it, you own it"), Bush and Cheney toppled Saddam, tried him in kangaroo court, lynched him, fired his army (now in the top echelons of ISIS), and replaced Saddam (a brutal secularist dictator) with Nouri al-Maliki (a brutal Shiite dictator). Does anyone think this was worth all the American blood and treasure?

The resistible rise of Nuri al-Maliki - openDemocracy

That's not even close to reality.
We achieved every objective set. We turned Saddam over to the Iraqis, who gave him a fair trial before hanging him. We staged 2 free and fair elections, somethign Democrats have failed to do at home. The country was reasonably stable and peaceful when we left.
Then Obama took office and everything went to shit.

How did Obama turn everything to shit in Iraq? Please be specific - with "credible" proof.

He ended a successful war, his own words.

 

[Lakhota]

After ignoring Colin Powell's advice ("you break it, you own it"), Bush and Cheney toppled Saddam, tried him in kangaroo court, lynched him, fired his army (now in the top echelons of ISIS), and replaced Saddam (a brutal secularist dictator) with Nouri al-Maliki (a brutal Shiite dictator). Does anyone think this was worth all the American blood and treasure? It's a no-brainer that ISIS would not exist in Iraq if Saddam were still in power.

The resistible rise of Nuri al-Maliki - openDemocracy

The same Powell y'all used to call the HOUSE n I g g e r?

Who called Powell that? Please be specific - with "credible" proof.

 

[jknowgood]

After ignoring Colin Powell's advice ("you break it, you own it"), Bush and Cheney toppled Saddam, tried him in kangaroo court, lynched him, fired his army (now in the top echelons of ISIS), and replaced Saddam (a brutal secularist dictator) with Nouri al-Maliki (a brutal Shiite dictator). Does anyone think this was worth all the American blood and treasure? It's a no-brainer that ISIS would not exist in Iraq if Saddam were still in power.

The resistible rise of Nuri al-Maliki - openDemocracy

The same Powell y'all used to call the HOUSE n I g g e r?

Who called Powell that? Please be specific - with "credible" proof.

Really y'all call all black republicans that.

 

[EconChick]

How many cities in Iraq did ISIS control when Bush left office?
How much territory in Iraq did ISIS control when Bush left office?
The answer to both is none someone needs to go back to whining about the name Redskins granted that is also highly stupid but not as stupid as threads like this.

Exactly.

Our resident liberal flakey chicks saw all the success I had getting posts bumped by using ACCURATE THREAD TITLES ...and their penchant for typing inaccurate posts only helped that goal. I came right out and thanked them for helping that little tactic. So they're trying to copy, LOL.

What the dummies don't realize is it ONLY works when the title is true. It backfires when the title is stupid like this one and like Candy's that said Obama gets credit for dropping gas prices.

Typical liberal flakes. LOL

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Progs <3 Uncle Saddam!!!

 

[EconChick]

And so my recommendation on countering such obvious deceit is to let the thread die. Or start one that counters it.

And boy is this one pathetic.

 

[Lakhota]

Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?

 

[The Rabbi]

After ignoring Colin Powell's advice ("you break it, you own it"), Bush and Cheney toppled Saddam, tried him in kangaroo court, lynched him, fired his army (now in the top echelons of ISIS), and replaced Saddam (a brutal secularist dictator) with Nouri al-Maliki (a brutal Shiite dictator). Does anyone think this was worth all the American blood and treasure? It's a no-brainer that ISIS would not exist in Iraq if Saddam were still in power.

The resistible rise of Nuri al-Maliki - openDemocracy

The same Powell y'all used to call the HOUSE n I g g e r?

Who called Powell that? Please be specific - with "credible" proof.

Unearthed Young Obama took racial swipe at Colin Powell

Next..
And Fakota's response will be: It didnt happen, it was made up. So what?

 

[The Rabbi]

Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?

He isn't.
Obama is blamed for Obama's incompetence. What part of that do you not get?

 

[Lakhota]

Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?

He isn't.
Obama is blamed for Obama's incompetence. What part of that do you not get?

How was Obama incompetent regarding Iraq? Please be specific - with "credible" proof.

 

[jknowgood]

Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?

No, actually it came out Maliki was willing to extend sofa. Another liberal lie.

 

[deltex1]

After ignoring Colin Powell's advice ("you break it, you own it"), Bush and Cheney toppled Saddam, tried him in kangaroo court, lynched him, fired his army (now in the top echelons of ISIS), and replaced Saddam (a brutal secularist dictator) with Nouri al-Maliki (a brutal Shiite dictator). Does anyone think this was worth all the American blood and treasure?

The resistible rise of Nuri al-Maliki - openDemocracy

That's not even close to reality.
We achieved every objective set. We turned Saddam over to the Iraqis, who gave him a fair trial before hanging him. We staged 2 free and fair elections, somethign Democrats have failed to do at home. The country was reasonably stable and peaceful when we left.
Then Obama took office and everything went to shit.

How did Obama turn everything to shit in Iraq? Please be specific - with "credible" proof.

He left. Iraq went to shit. What more do you need to know? Are you grappling with cause and effect, like Foo?

 

[jknowgood]

Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?

He isn't.
Obama is blamed for Obama's incompetence. What part of that do you not get?

How was Obama incompetent regarding Iraq? Please be specific - with "credible" proof.

Like I said obama said he ended a successful war. After that his incompetence caused the problem we have now.

 

[Lakhota]

Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?

No, actually it came out Maliki was willing to extend sofa. Another liberal lie.

Yes, Maliki was willing to extend SOFA - if Obama allowed American troops to be subject to Iraqi law. Would you have wanted that for our troops? Why do you hate our troops?

 

[deltex1]

Ironicly, Hussein kept groups like this in check. Only with his absence are they possible in Iraq.

Egypt was better off with Mubarak, Libya with Ghadaffi, Syria with Assad ....so what's the point?

 

[jknowgood]

Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?

No, actually it came out Maliki was willing to extend sofa. Another liberal lie.

Yes, Maliki was willing to extend SOFA - if Obama allowed American troops to be subject to Iraqi law. Would you have wanted that for our troops? Why do you hate our troops?

No, it has come out that he was willing to negotiate it, but Obama wanted to get the troops out. He owns this one.

 

[deltex1]

Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?

No, actually it came out Maliki was willing to extend sofa. Another liberal lie.

Yes, Maliki was willing to extend SOFA - if Obama allowed American troops to be subject to Iraqi law. Would you have wanted that for our troops? Why do you hate our troops?

That's the story Psaki tells...not Panetta or the generals.

 

[deltex1]

Cowboy kickoff...argue among yourselves...I'll be baaaaaaaack.

 

[jknowgood]

Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?

No, actually it came out Maliki was willing to extend sofa. Another liberal lie.

Yes, Maliki was willing to extend SOFA - if Obama allowed American troops to be subject to Iraqi law. Would you have wanted that for our troops? Why do you hate our troops?

Oh, I don't hate our troops. I'm not counting their deaths on a daily basis for political reasons. I do remember liberals doing that.

 

[blackhawk]

Nouri al-Maliki refused to extend the Bush/Cheney SOFA - and told American forces to leave. That left Nouri al-Maliki in charge of Iraq - so how can Obama be blamed for Maliki's incompetence?

First Bush the man the left loves to insult was able to what Obama couldn't get a SOFA agreement with Maliki how is that possible? Let's look at it before he became President Obama candidate Obama made it clear if he was elected he would get out of Iraq he opposed and voted against the Iraq war fine that was his right he also opposed the surge strategy also his right as a candidate for President he consistently called Iraq the wrong war the unnecessary war and repeated his pledge to get out does anyone notice the Obama pattern here? This brings us back to the question how was Bush able to get a SOFA agreement with Maliki while Obama couldn't when you look at Obama's past stands on Iraq the answer is very simple he never really wanted one.