easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,102
- 2,645
The Russian Defense Ministry called it an “emergency release of an air ordnance,” also “an abnormal descent of aviation munitions.”
Oops.
Oops.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This is the high-powered modern military that's supposed to have the world quaking?The Russian Defense Ministry called it an “emergency release of an air ordnance,” also “an abnormal descent of aviation munitions.”
Oops.
Not necessarily.Either the pilot was poorly trained or there was a systems failure.
Will Putin will keep bombing Russian cities until Ukraine submits?
Yes, Russia HAS demonstrated that they do not have a professional, well supplied military and that their logistics are woefully inadequate. Putin was likely lied to about the state of the military but that only makes him more dangerous. IF he loses, he dies along with much of his immediate circle of oligarchs. Enough of the military still support him that it's entirely possible they'd obey a command to use tactical nukes as a way of shocking the enemies of Russia into a ceasefire in place to keep an out of control escalation from occurring.This is the high-powered modern military that's supposed to have the world quaking?
Ukraine did not launch that missile at Poland. It was a Ukr S-300 that was targeting a cruise missile heading for Lviv. The S-300 failed to intercept and landed in Poland.Where was all this concern when Ukraine launched a missile at Poland? That's in the opposite direction of Russia. Talk about inept.
No, you can't just *not* intercept a missile aimed at one of your cities because there happens to be a border nearby.para bellum Actually they did launch that missile at Poland. The Ukraine is responsible for their own munitions, to include factoring in a potential miss. They are inept.
This is a myth. That term was coined by westerners (much to the Kremlin's delight).In fact, that is his stated doctrine. Freeze a conflict in place by using a nuke and assuming the west wouldn't have the balls to retaliate in kind, Or FTM, to retaliate in any serious way at all. They call it "escalate to de-escalate".
I think that a bout of sanity will break out..after Putin dies.This is a myth. That term was coined by westerners (much to the Kremlin's delight).
Russia's stated policy only allows for nukes to be used if there is an existential threat to the Russian State. i.e. If there is a conventional army approaching Moscow, Russian doctrine reserves the right to use a nuclear weapon.
Even the threat of using nukes in Ukraine violates the NPT. Nuclear Weapons States (the P5) pledge not to use or threaten to use a nuclear weapon against any Non-nuclear Weapon State.
The missile most likely came from the Black Sea, but it could have came from Kursk or Belgorod. Russia fired 95 missiles and drones at Ukraine infrastructure and civilian targets that day.para bellum Don't be silly, the Russian missile didn't come from the west. The only way to hit Poland is by firing the air defense late. At which point, yes, you let it hit its intended target. Worse, the neo-nazis tried to cover their idiocy by lying about it.