We had a chance after the fall of the Soviet Union to make things better. Reagan was more of a peaceful man but Bush was a war mongering neo con globalist. Do you keep kicking someone in the ballz because you can? That is what we did. Rubbing it in over and over. Putin is not a globalist. But he has near several thousand nukes and the neo cons understand that.How many times does a guy have to punch you before you punch back? Seriously? He will keep on fucking with us as long as we just take it.Because you are arguing with me. You have no skin in this game at all unless you are one of our Russian lurkers.Why do you care to defend the indefensible? I can understand you people denying Russian collusion by your president but why defend Putin? The guy is a monster.Stalin started with an united Russian Empire, something that Putin knows he can never have, and probably wouldn't want even if he could.
I'm pointing out how relatively weak Putin's Russia is.
How do you interpret that as a "Defense"?
Yes, I am against needless conflict and war, and thus end up arguing with many who disagree.
But none of that could sanely be called "Defending" Putin.
So, why did you claim it was?