Rush Limbaugh is here to "save the day."

It is so funny to hear what comes out of the mouths of these Reich wing radio talk show hosts, and those on FOX news that are trying to lift the baboon nominee up, but are only crushed under the weight of a candidate that has no honor, no respect, no dignity, and the only loyalty he has is too himself.

So Mr. Talent on loan from Gawwwwddd-d has decided to step in here and give Trump some advice.

Just give a "short" speech:

Call Dems 'Baby Butchers,' 'Sharia Muslims--Marxists"

Of course any speech that Trump gives should be very short. If you give him too much time he will insult another voting block. Which is why Twitter is only 140 characters. And we've all seen already what Trump's tweety fingers can do.
Rush to Trump: Call Dems 'Baby Butchers,' 'Sharia Muslims,' 'Marxists'

Well that should do it folks--all the way to the White House with this--LOL

23456277210800-05231901.jpg


Rush is a hoot. I don't always agree with him, but he's almost always entertaining


Yesterday, he was on the airwaves--calling Donald Trump a hero--for his suggestion that the "Russians" get those 30K emails of Hillary Clinton's, and the MEDIA in this country would reward the Russians.

At minimum Trump is encouraging a crime, if Russia produces these 30K emails, it become collusion between a foreign Nation to produce SECRETS which is then called TREASON.

This is how much TALENT on loan from Gaaaawww-d-- Rush Limbaugh really has. In his hate of Hillary Clinton he cannot see through the trees to see the forest. Limbaugh is supporting a candidate that has been endorsed by Russia.
Dems accuse Trump of disloyalty over Clinton emails - CNNPolitics.com

Donald Trump is wholly unfit to be Commander & Chief of this country.

20817865-mmmain.jpg

Democrats are so stupid, it was SARCASM, dim wit.

Seriously, you think Trump was serious the media would praise Putin for sticking it to Hillary? You're delusional.

So Hillary can actually provide Russians with insecure access to classified information and you're OK with that. If Trump jokes at her expense about it, OMG! Treason!
 
It is so funny to hear what comes out of the mouths of these Reich wing radio talk show hosts, and those on FOX news that are trying to lift the baboon nominee up, but are only crushed under the weight of a candidate that has no honor, no respect, no dignity, and the only loyalty he has is too himself.

So Mr. Talent on loan from Gawwwwddd-d has decided to step in here and give Trump some advice.

Just give a "short" speech:

Call Dems 'Baby Butchers,' 'Sharia Muslims--Marxists"

Of course any speech that Trump gives should be very short. If you give him too much time he will insult another voting block. Which is why Twitter is only 140 characters. And we've all seen already what Trump's tweety fingers can do.
Rush to Trump: Call Dems 'Baby Butchers,' 'Sharia Muslims,' 'Marxists'

Well that should do it folks--all the way to the White House with this--LOL

23456277210800-05231901.jpg


Rush is a hoot. I don't always agree with him, but he's almost always entertaining


Yesterday, Limbaugh was on the airwaves--calling Donald Trump a hero--for his suggestion that the "Russians" get those 30K emails of Hillary Clinton's, and the MEDIA in this country would reward the Russians.

At minimum Trump is encouraging a crime, if Russia produces these 30K emails, it become collusion between a foreign Nation to produce SECRETS which is then called TREASON.

This is how much TALENT on loan from Gaaaawww-d-- Rush Limbaugh really has. In his hate of Hillary Clinton he cannot see through the trees to see the forest. Limbaugh is supporting a candidate that has been endorsed by Russia.
Dems accuse Trump of disloyalty over Clinton emails - CNNPolitics.com

Donald Trump is wholly unfit to be Commander & Chief of this country.

20817865-mmmain.jpg
Mindless morons.....
 
Limbaugh and others are the reason the Republican party has been shattered into pieces. They continually violate Reagan's 11th commandment: "Thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Republican"--they do it all the time for nothing more than political entertainment, ratings and those obscene profit breaks.
So, you're saying that nobody who is a member of any party should criticize members of said party? Typical leftist drone.


That's all Limbaugh has been doing for the last 20 years--LOL. They fill their listeners with 3 or more daily hours of Reich wing hyperbole, half truths, conspiracy theories, misconceptions for political entertainment--for ratings and those obscene profit breaks.

Rush Limbaugh was also very instrumental in helping Barack Obama win a 2nd term. While they've all told you Romney lost because he wasn't conservative enough--(that couldn't be farther from the TRUTH.) You lost the largest voting block in this country--Women--by making your platform about abortion, that then went into who's not going to pay for birth control pills, to what is legal legit rape questions, that was always answered by an ancient male Republican--that sent women running into Obama's column by double digits, younger women by a whopping 36 points. THAT'S WHY ROMNEY LOST. They lied to you--LOL
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump
Why Romney Lost And Republicans Keep Losing
Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History

Rush Limbaugh went on a 30 minute fit over the cost of birth control pills, and ended up calling a woman a slut, which immediately elevated her to national media attention. She was used in advertisements, and even gave a speech on the DNC platform over his comment--LOL


A every time he or others refers to Hillary Clinton as a cervix or vagina, he slams another home run for her.

Maybe someday--your rusted out brains--will figure out that the worst thing that could happen to these Reich wing talk show hosts, is that Hillary Clinton loses this election.
it's like you are saying, women are these crazed sex addicts who vote for popping contraception pills like candy.
Only those manufactured by the government 'education' system. They manufacture women with no morals or ethics, convince them that the world owes them everything, then convinces them they have a right to it, then convinces them that the Republicans want to take it away.


You cannot legislate your version of morality from Washington D.C. no matter how hard you try. These are U.S. Supreme court issues, not political ones. They belong no where on a political platform. Any politician that tells you they can do something about abortion or gay marriage is LYING to you.

Campaigning on them has been great for Killing the Republican party.

Instead of Republicans learning anything from their loss of 2012--they just doubled down for the most extreme--divisive platform they could come up with in 2016. And this is why the Republican party continues to SHRINK.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/19/opinion/the-most-extreme-republican-platform-in-memory.html?_r=1
HA! Oh, that's funny. So, what exactly are laws? Here I thought that laws were to keep you from doing immoral things, like killing people, interfering with an investigation, lying under oath, or dumping classified information into the laps of unqualified people.

On the other hand, what I'm referring to isn't legislation, but teaching method, and curriculum.

You have to be absolutely clueless to think what the Republicans are doing is what's dividing America. Your failure president has been preaching that the cops are wrong for shooting criminals because some of them are black, and the media has been searching out stories to tell so they can heavily imply that every killing involving a black criminal was somehow racially motivated, which is what created the rioting fools calling for the deaths of police in the first place. Republicans didn't do this, your president and media bias did. Thanks to the Liberal media and your failure president, there's a movement against white people and police officers.

The furthest you can even go is to claim it's because they're calling for keeping illegals out of the country, and that's not even divisive, it's enforcing the law, something your failure president has been fighting against.The way your failure president and Liberal media has been twisting it, people gullible enough, like you, actually believe calling for enforcement of the law means hating Latinos and black people.

I suspect your favorite drink is Kool-aid. You should stop watching CNN, the DNC owns them~
 
The post belongs in the media forum (or the rubber room) but the question remains why the radical left constantly whines about a single radio show so much when they have ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN, the Comedy Channel, Al Jazeera, the NY Times, the Daily News and the Washington Post (not to mention tax exempt entities like Media Matters) as slobbering propaganda arms of the democrat party.
 
You know, I can't remember if I'm mixing you up with someone else. Were you advocating gun control?

EDIT: Yep, I went and checked, you're definitely who I thought you were. Liberal all the way.

Nah, you've not seen me advocate gun control, ya may have seen me challenge some of the stupid shit rabid frothy mouthed gun nuts post. I own, permitted to carry, just not maniacally stupid knee jerky about it all.

Which in your eyes makes me a "liberal" which is again meaningless coming from the lies of you.

Oh be honest, you're a leftist shill

All that means is we disagreed on something, and thanks.

Every thread I've seen you post in you were solidly with the left. What is the deal with you people who always align with the left wanting to say you're not a leftist? Why don't you demonstrate it with some non-leftist views in stead of saying the words you're not a leftist?

Maybe you oughtta converse someday as opposed to labeling everyone the first time they have a point of view differing from yours.
Someday.
Not the first time, every time is not one time.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz
The post belongs in the media forum (or the rubber room) but the question remains why the radical left constantly whines about a single radio show so much when they have ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN, the Comedy Channel, Al Jazeera, the NY Times, the Daily News and the Washington Post (not to mention tax exempt entities like Media Matters) as slobbering propaganda arms of the democrat party.
It's because progressive tolerance doesn't extend to ideas and opinions, just colors and gender identifications.
 
Nah, you've not seen me advocate gun control, ya may have seen me challenge some of the stupid shit rabid frothy mouthed gun nuts post. I own, permitted to carry, just not maniacally stupid knee jerky about it all.

Which in your eyes makes me a "liberal" which is again meaningless coming from the lies of you.

Oh be honest, you're a leftist shill

All that means is we disagreed on something, and thanks.

Every thread I've seen you post in you were solidly with the left. What is the deal with you people who always align with the left wanting to say you're not a leftist? Why don't you demonstrate it with some non-leftist views in stead of saying the words you're not a leftist?

Maybe you oughtta converse someday as opposed to labeling everyone the first time they have a point of view differing from yours.
Someday.
Not the first time, every time is not one time.

I'm fine with your disapproval hon, it's reassuring.
 
Oh be honest, you're a leftist shill

All that means is we disagreed on something, and thanks.

Every thread I've seen you post in you were solidly with the left. What is the deal with you people who always align with the left wanting to say you're not a leftist? Why don't you demonstrate it with some non-leftist views in stead of saying the words you're not a leftist?

Maybe you oughtta converse someday as opposed to labeling everyone the first time they have a point of view differing from yours.
Someday.
Not the first time, every time is not one time.

I'm fine with your disapproval hon, it's reassuring.

Note you say "are not" but you can't point to any non-leftist positions you take in any discussions
 
Oh be honest, you're a leftist shill

All that means is we disagreed on something, and thanks.

Every thread I've seen you post in you were solidly with the left. What is the deal with you people who always align with the left wanting to say you're not a leftist? Why don't you demonstrate it with some non-leftist views in stead of saying the words you're not a leftist?

Maybe you oughtta converse someday as opposed to labeling everyone the first time they have a point of view differing from yours.
Someday.
Not the first time, every time is not one time.

I'm fine with your disapproval hon, it's reassuring.
I don't disapprove of you following my expectations. I keep low expectations and high hopes for every person. Everybody falls under one or the other, most people fall under the low expectations.
 
The post belongs in the media forum (or the rubber room) but the question remains why the radical left constantly whines about a single radio show so much when they have ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN, the Comedy Channel, Al Jazeera, the NY Times, the Daily News and the Washington Post (not to mention tax exempt entities like Media Matters) as slobbering propaganda arms of the democrat party.
It's because progressive tolerance doesn't extend to ideas and opinions, just colors and gender identifications.


It's because Clinton deregulated the FCC and 6 major multinational corporations control what ~90% of what americans see, hear, and read. That's down from 50 some odd companies back in the 1980s. It is a direct result of over deregulation, privatization, and acquiescence to corporate power lobbying.
 
All that means is we disagreed on something, and thanks.

Every thread I've seen you post in you were solidly with the left. What is the deal with you people who always align with the left wanting to say you're not a leftist? Why don't you demonstrate it with some non-leftist views in stead of saying the words you're not a leftist?

Maybe you oughtta converse someday as opposed to labeling everyone the first time they have a point of view differing from yours.
Someday.
Not the first time, every time is not one time.

I'm fine with your disapproval hon, it's reassuring.

Note you say "are not" but you can't point to any non-leftist positions you take in any discussions

And why is that so important to you? This is a serious problem in american society. Category trumps all, "I need a label on you" before anything else matters. Ideas are not "left" or "right", we've been programmed to react that way reflexively. Who do you think that serves? And really now, once that occurs, there is no discussion.
 
Every thread I've seen you post in you were solidly with the left. What is the deal with you people who always align with the left wanting to say you're not a leftist? Why don't you demonstrate it with some non-leftist views in stead of saying the words you're not a leftist?

Maybe you oughtta converse someday as opposed to labeling everyone the first time they have a point of view differing from yours.
Someday.
Not the first time, every time is not one time.

I'm fine with your disapproval hon, it's reassuring.

Note you say "are not" but you can't point to any non-leftist positions you take in any discussions

And why is that so important to you? This is a serious problem in american society. Category trumps all, "I need a label on you" before anything else matters. Ideas are not "left" or "right", we've been programmed to react that way reflexively. Who do you think that serves? And really now, once that occurs, there is no discussion.

Strawman
 
Maybe you oughtta converse someday as opposed to labeling everyone the first time they have a point of view differing from yours.
Someday.
Not the first time, every time is not one time.

I'm fine with your disapproval hon, it's reassuring.

Note you say "are not" but you can't point to any non-leftist positions you take in any discussions

And why is that so important to you? This is a serious problem in american society. Category trumps all, "I need a label on you" before anything else matters. Ideas are not "left" or "right", we've been programmed to react that way reflexively. Who do you think that serves? And really now, once that occurs, there is no discussion.

Strawman

Uh huh.
 
Not the first time, every time is not one time.

I'm fine with your disapproval hon, it's reassuring.

Note you say "are not" but you can't point to any non-leftist positions you take in any discussions

And why is that so important to you? This is a serious problem in american society. Category trumps all, "I need a label on you" before anything else matters. Ideas are not "left" or "right", we've been programmed to react that way reflexively. Who do you think that serves? And really now, once that occurs, there is no discussion.

Strawman

Uh huh.

So just to be clear, everything you post about is "so important to you?" Otherwise you don't post it?

And labels have nothing to do with it. You are always in my experience on the side of the left. Why does that observation by several of us bother you so much? I even asked what you argue that is not left and you couldn't answer it
 
It is so funny to hear what comes out of the mouths of these Reich wing radio talk show hosts, and those on FOX news that are trying to lift the baboon nominee up, but are only crushed under the weight of a candidate that has no honor, no respect, no dignity, and the only loyalty he has is too himself.

So Mr. Talent on loan from Gawwwwddd-d has decided to step in here and give Trump some advice.

Just give a "short" speech:

Call Dems 'Baby Butchers,' 'Sharia Muslims--Marxists"

Of course any speech that Trump gives should be very short. If you give him too much time he will insult another voting block. Which is why Twitter is only 140 characters. And we've all seen already what Trump's tweety fingers can do.
Rush to Trump: Call Dems 'Baby Butchers,' 'Sharia Muslims,' 'Marxists'

Well that should do it folks--all the way to the White House with this--LOL

23456277210800-05231901.jpg


Rush is a hoot. I don't always agree with him, but he's almost always entertaining


Yesterday, Limbaugh was on the airwaves--calling Donald Trump a hero--for his suggestion that the "Russians" get those 30K emails of Hillary Clinton's, and the MEDIA in this country would reward the Russians.

At minimum Trump is encouraging a crime, if Russia produces these 30K emails, it become collusion between a foreign Nation to produce SECRETS which is then called TREASON.

This is how much TALENT on loan from Gaaaawww-d-- Rush Limbaugh really has. In his hate of Hillary Clinton he cannot see through the trees to see the forest. Limbaugh is supporting a candidate that has been endorsed by Russia.
Dems accuse Trump of disloyalty over Clinton emails - CNNPolitics.com

Donald Trump is wholly unfit to be Commander & Chief of this country.

20817865-mmmain.jpg
danzcolorplus6543.jpg
 
You know, I can't remember if I'm mixing you up with someone else. Were you advocating gun control?

EDIT: Yep, I went and checked, you're definitely who I thought you were. Liberal all the way.

Nah, you've not seen me advocate gun control, ya may have seen me challenge some of the stupid shit rabid frothy mouthed gun nuts post. I own, permitted to carry, just not maniacally stupid knee jerky about it all.

Which in your eyes makes me a "liberal" which is again meaningless coming from the lies of you.

Oh be honest, you're a leftist shill

All that means is we disagreed on something, and thanks.

Every thread I've seen you post in you were solidly with the left. What is the deal with you people who always align with the left wanting to say you're not a leftist? Why don't you demonstrate it with some non-leftist views in stead of saying the words you're not a leftist?

Maybe you oughtta converse someday as opposed to labeling everyone the first time they have a point of view differing from yours.
Someday.
Maybe you should shut up, commie.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz
The post belongs in the media forum (or the rubber room) but the question remains why the radical left constantly whines about a single radio show so much when they have ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN, the Comedy Channel, Al Jazeera, the NY Times, the Daily News and the Washington Post (not to mention tax exempt entities like Media Matters) as slobbering propaganda arms of the democrat party.
It's because progressive tolerance doesn't extend to ideas and opinions, just colors and gender identifications.
Not all colors....
 
Nah, you've not seen me advocate gun control, ya may have seen me challenge some of the stupid shit rabid frothy mouthed gun nuts post. I own, permitted to carry, just not maniacally stupid knee jerky about it all.

Which in your eyes makes me a "liberal" which is again meaningless coming from the lies of you.

Oh be honest, you're a leftist shill

All that means is we disagreed on something, and thanks.

Every thread I've seen you post in you were solidly with the left. What is the deal with you people who always align with the left wanting to say you're not a leftist? Why don't you demonstrate it with some non-leftist views in stead of saying the words you're not a leftist?

Maybe you oughtta converse someday as opposed to labeling everyone the first time they have a point of view differing from yours.
Someday.
Maybe you should shut up, commie.

"Commie", beautiful, for all those times when you have absolutley no cogent argument or comment.
 
Oh be honest, you're a leftist shill

All that means is we disagreed on something, and thanks.

Every thread I've seen you post in you were solidly with the left. What is the deal with you people who always align with the left wanting to say you're not a leftist? Why don't you demonstrate it with some non-leftist views in stead of saying the words you're not a leftist?

Maybe you oughtta converse someday as opposed to labeling everyone the first time they have a point of view differing from yours.
Someday.
Maybe you should shut up, commie.

"Commie", beautiful, for all those times when you have absolutley no cogent argument or comment.
What did you say that warrants argument?

Nothing. Lefties always whine about being correctly identified.
 

Forum List

Back
Top