Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You forgot to mention then Dems/libs support a third war and all expansions of the current 2 wars that they supported going into in the first place.... Of coure this is making more vets all the while lolz.
To be fair, the war with libya is supported and opposed by people on both sides. it doesnt seem to be a partisan divide.
Barbara Boxer rips proposed cuts to homeless vets housing : SFGate: Politics Blog
The yellow ribbons on their cars never ment truely supporting our vets.
Some day the right leaning voter will have to face what the right leaders are really about.
A damn shame and disgusting to make such cuts, btw I accidentally thanked and repped somebody who favors these cuts that will hurt our down and out vets that need this help,I did not mean to do such.
you can remove your thanks, if you want.
So Obama bloated up spending by dramatically increasing spending for this program, which now needs to be rolled back because we can't afford.
Federal spending in absolute dollars has increased over 25% since 2007. If this program is a priority, let them Dems figure out somewhere else to cut.
And you think this will balence the budget?
How about NO attacking vets for your failed political ideas
You guys on the left really make no sense sometimes.
You put on a show being enraged at the accusation of cuts to our vets (whether or not there actually are any, i don't know). Yet you demand we cut the military spending all the time.
So you want to cut spending supporting our current military, but increase money (or atleast keep it the same) for the former military. With all due respect to the vets, I kind of think that the current troops should be a higher priority.
Unless of course, your over all plan is to produce less vets by defunding our current military to the point where few if any survive. That's just absurd.
Now, I am of the opinion that our military spending can be cut significantly while maintaining our skill and efficiency by eliminating alot of the waste and irresponsible spending. My guess there is probably some wasteful spending involved with veteran benefits. I mean this is the government we are talking about.
I'm for cutting wasteful spending no matter where it's found. So perhaps you could present a more fact based argument and a less emotionally based argument. What benefits are being proposed to be cut? Is this the most efficient use of our money? Can we provide them cheaper somehow?
I see no reason why we can't eliminate waste and keep our vets well taken care of.
So cali thinks calling Boxer a traitor is more important than vets sleeping in the street
Why don't you show us where she said that... you lying piece of shit.
And you think this will balence the budget?
How about NO attacking vets for your failed political ideas
You guys on the left really make no sense sometimes.
You put on a show being enraged at the accusation of cuts to our vets (whether or not there actually are any, i don't know). Yet you demand we cut the military spending all the time.
So you want to cut spending supporting our current military, but increase money (or atleast keep it the same) for the former military. With all due respect to the vets, I kind of think that the current troops should be a higher priority.
Unless of course, your over all plan is to produce less vets by defunding our current military to the point where few if any survive. That's just absurd.
Now, I am of the opinion that our military spending can be cut significantly while maintaining our skill and efficiency by eliminating alot of the waste and irresponsible spending. My guess there is probably some wasteful spending involved with veteran benefits. I mean this is the government we are talking about.
I'm for cutting wasteful spending no matter where it's found. So perhaps you could present a more fact based argument and a less emotionally based argument. What benefits are being proposed to be cut? Is this the most efficient use of our money? Can we provide them cheaper somehow?
I see no reason why we can't eliminate waste and keep our vets well taken care of.
Then why are you not saying a damned thing about the Rs who are trying to get this passed?
These vets deserve this help and much more.
Military can be cut and that has NOTHING to do with helping vets.
You forgot to mention then Dems/libs support a third war and all expansions of the current 2 wars that they supported going into in the first place.... Of coure this is making more vets all the while lolz.
To be fair, the war with libya is supported and opposed by people on both sides. it doesnt seem to be a partisan divide.
Oh I was not trying to make it out to be about 1 side at the issue of the our third war is an issue to itself. TM is making it out as if taking care of our vets is a "righties" hate fest so I had to point out where our money goes that could otherwise fund our vets and that the left (TM's side if you will) seems to support war but not the vets as we are broke =D
Neocons were bad under Bush, and still are today as provided by TM, the new new Neocons.
She never once commented on the fact that these vets will not get the help they deserve and went straight into a hate diatribe about Boxer.
You care more about that than the vets to apparently
You guys on the left really make no sense sometimes.
You put on a show being enraged at the accusation of cuts to our vets (whether or not there actually are any, i don't know). Yet you demand we cut the military spending all the time.
So you want to cut spending supporting our current military, but increase money (or atleast keep it the same) for the former military. With all due respect to the vets, I kind of think that the current troops should be a higher priority.
Unless of course, your over all plan is to produce less vets by defunding our current military to the point where few if any survive. That's just absurd.
Now, I am of the opinion that our military spending can be cut significantly while maintaining our skill and efficiency by eliminating alot of the waste and irresponsible spending. My guess there is probably some wasteful spending involved with veteran benefits. I mean this is the government we are talking about.
I'm for cutting wasteful spending no matter where it's found. So perhaps you could present a more fact based argument and a less emotionally based argument. What benefits are being proposed to be cut? Is this the most efficient use of our money? Can we provide them cheaper somehow?
I see no reason why we can't eliminate waste and keep our vets well taken care of.
Then why are you not saying a damned thing about the Rs who are trying to get this passed?
These vets deserve this help and much more.
Military can be cut and that has NOTHING to do with helping vets.
That's it? That's all you have to say? You aren't going to bother to answer a single question.
She never once commented on the fact that these vets will not get the help they deserve and went straight into a hate diatribe about Boxer.
You care more about that than the vets to apparently
So how is that third war going?
There was nothing in my service contract about getting money for a home.
oh WAIT
It's called a VA Home Loan.
what was that you were saying about R's taking away Vets money?
first it is not thier money.
second the only party to take away Vets money was the D's.
Shame you can't read except what you want to read.
So none of you righties are going to tell your reps to fund these vets and find their cuts somewhere else?
You are pretending that taking away the money that is there to offer to homeless vets so they dont have to sleep on the street is some mystery money.
It is cut and clear.
This has NOTHING to do with intelligent cuts to the military.
This is about vets.
They are NOT the same thing like you want to pretend.
So how is that third war going?
None of our people killed yet.
