Romney's pro-enforcement more popular than Obama's pro-amnesty!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by get_involved, Nov 8, 2012.

  1. get_involved
    Offline

    get_involved Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,036
    Thanks Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +565
    "Between 60-70 percent of Hispanics voted Democratic. That's high but not even close to the record high of 90 percent of Hispanics who went for Lyndon Johnson in 1964. As the liberal blogger, Jamelle Bouie has written, there are significant non-immigration reasons that Hispanics have historically voted for Democratic candidates, including a strong ethnic solidarity and a greater interest in government social programs than some other groups. Thirty percent of Hispanics consider themselves "liberal" or "very liberal" compared with 21 percent of the general public."

    https://www.numbersusa.com/content/...2012/observations-post-election-coverage.html
     
  2. Matthew
    Offline

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49,663
    Thanks Received:
    4,595
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +15,149
    Obama's pro amnesty won.
     
  3. OKTexas
    Offline

    OKTexas New Life Member of the NRA 12/15 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    23,998
    Thanks Received:
    3,741
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Near Magnolia, TX
    Ratings:
    +11,172
    Yep, and who can we thank for that. Can you say Reagan, he allowed himself to be snookered by the dems by giving amnesty and not getting the enforcement. Thanks to him we now have 50,000 hispanics turning 18 every month and most of them want more amnesty. So hell yeah, let's make the same mistake again, it will make every thing better.
     
  4. get_involved
    Offline

    get_involved Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,036
    Thanks Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +565
    You obviously didn't read the article or didn't understand it. :rolleyes:


    -
     

Share This Page