History should be unbiased and factual, but sadly politics and power often influence the writing of history more than it should and that in turn means more conflict.
It is pretty much impossible to write a history that is not biased one way or the other.
Even assuming that one is setting out ONLY to note facts as they happen, the selection of what facts are germane to the history is a bias.
Totally Unbiased history is a target to shoot for but not one that can really be obtained.
I agree, but that does not mean we should not try to target an unbiased history as possible. In this case of the OP and others, that is clearly not happening.
Of course not.
Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp,
Or what's a heaven for?
― Robert Browning, Men and Women and Other Poems
Or what's a heaven for?
― Robert Browning, Men and Women and Other Poems