Retired Air Force officer sentenced to 3 years for storing classified information at his Florida home

[Delldude]

And?

Biden claimed they were in a locked garage. Shows he knew they were there.

 

[Dadoalex]

Biden claimed they were in a locked garage. Shows he knew they were there.

And he know the garage was locked.
Take 100 garages at random and I'm willing to bet exactly ZERO owners know each and every item in the garage and its location.

The way this works is we follow the evidence to a conclusion not we have a conclusion now we need evidence to prove it.

 

[Delldude]

And he know the garage was locked.
Take 100 garages at random and I'm willing to bet exactly ZERO owners know each and every item in the garage and its location.

The way this works is we follow the evidence to a conclusion not we have a conclusion now we need evidence to prove it.

Same garage Hunter was running sun bunnies around in Daddy's Vette' and I'm sure the garage door was open.
Same garage attached to the same house that Hunter had been 'renting' from Daddy.
Same house where Hunter's laptop contents showed a letter written which looked like a cut and paste from a classified intelligence assessment.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Same garage Hunter was running sun bunnies around in Daddy's Vette' and I'm sure the garage door was open.
Same garage attached to the same house that Hunter had been 'renting' from Daddy.
Same house where Hunter's laptop contents showed a letter written which looked like a cut and paste from a classified intelligence assessment.

So what? You have no provenance at all for your opinions. And if they are opinions, fine, so go squat. But if you are saying they are facts, let's see the proof.

ps: There will be yelling, ad homs, but no proof.

 

[Delldude]

But if you are saying they are facts, let's see the proof.

Been covered extensively in news media.

ps: There will be yelling, ad homs, but no proof.

You got the wrong guy.......Homie doesn't play dat.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Been covered extensively in news media.

You got the wrong guy.......Homie doesn't play dat.

No evidence of proof has been presented, only opinions.

 

[Delldude]

No evidence of proof has been presented, only opinions.

Media says otherwise...............proof is forthcoming. Is how investigations go.

 

[Delldude]

No evidence of proof has been presented, only opinions.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Delldude, there is no evidence.

 

[Magnus]

Retired Air Force officer sentenced to 3 years for storing classified information at his Florida home...​

But his Commander and Chief who did far worse is being protected...

Since this guy retired in 2018 -you will be happy to know that his then C-in-C - Trump, will be indicted on Tuesday for the very same crime.

Nice, eh?

 

[Delldude]

Delldude, there is no evidence.

Guess Biden admitting he had them in his garage doesn't count.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Guess Biden admitting he had them in his garage doesn't count.

There is no evidence that it was deliberate, there was no denial, there was immediate notification to the responsible officials, and there was immediate return of documents.

Your boy denied and lied, hid documents, and had to be "raided" lawfully to get them back.

He may be in detention by Tuesday night.

 

[easyt65]

There is no evidence that it was deliberate,

So Biden had no intentional reason to steal classified dating all the way back to 1974, not even several menbers of his family working with / for the Chinese, Russians, Romanians, Ukrainians, Burisma...laundering money for and recieving millions from these groups?

Joe abandons classified material in an unauthorized, unsecured, unmonitored office given to him by the CCP ... but THAT isn't any reason to believe Joe MEANT to give the CCP classified information...it was all an innocent mistake...

No evidence, buh?!

 

[beagle9]

It does if he declassifies things without regard to what he was declassifying.
Like Trump walking into a SCIF, and without knowing what was there, just declaring "everything in here is now declassified"

Talk about a ridiculous hypothetical... Good grief . lol

If Trump saw criminal activity in any of these documents that were removed, and so he removed the documents for safe keeping, (in case they were ever needed in a possible case leading to a trial of the alledged corrupt individual's that were being seen in the documents as being corrupt maybe), then confiscating the document's (if weren't top secret or of a national security threat), was ok under his right as the President to do so.... If he was protecting the documents by taking them out of circulation away from those who might want to destroy them if they could in the location that they were in, andb it was all because the document's could implicate the people wanting to destroy them if they could get their hands on them, then Trump was correct as president to move them if it was legal for him to do so.. Trump did a good thing for the nation if the case scenario above is correct......

The government should only afterwards, want a look see (by government officials who qualify to see the documents if need be in a very bipartisan way), and this by request based upon the assumption that the document's may have been removed illegally or suspiciously..... A very private oversight look at the documents with Trump, IOW's to make sure that a concern like national security isn't associated with said document's would be normal or should be normal in the case. I'm thinking that government motivation in the case might not be legit or certain people in government are using government in an inappropriate way to make sure that the document's don't hold incriminating evidence against them.

If the document's are of no national security concern, in which would be another issue altogether, then Trump is being investigated by his political enemies that fear he has evidence against them or will return with that evidence to get them, otherwise if that is what is found in the documents he has removed, and therefore he did so for future possibilities concerning the matter of illegal activities that is possibly shown in those documents concerning high levels of government.

Only if the document's were found to involve Trump trying to hide or conceal something that he may have done, otherwise upon his alledged unauthorized reasoning for removal of said document's (a covering up so to speak) or that it involved a national security breach of some sort, should there be reasoning for
anyone subpoenaing the document's return or asking for the document's to be released from Trump's custody at Mara-lago if they were secure and no threat to national security due to the time stamps (elapsed time), of the document's content.

Such things will be reviewed in the trial if it ever comes down to that.

 

[beagle9]

There is no evidence that it was deliberate, there was no denial, there was immediate notification to the responsible officials, and there was immediate return of documents.

Your boy denied and lied, hid documents, and had to be "raided" lawfully to get them back.

He may be in detention by Tuesday night.

Immediate response after what was being viewed in the Trump case ? Sounds more like a cover ones ace response.

 

[beagle9]

So Biden had no intentional reason to steal classified dating all the way back to 1974, not even several menbers of his family working with / for the Chinese, Russians, Romanians, Ukrainians, Burisma...laundering money for and recieving millions from these groups?

Joe abandons classified material in an unauthorized, unsecured, unmonitored office given to him by the CCP ... but THAT isn't any reason to believe Joe MEANT to give the CCP classified information...it was all an innocent mistake...

No evidence, buh?!

The hypocrisy is deafening if it were an F-4 phantom jet passing by with it's after burners ablaze in the air above us

 

[beagle9]

No evidence of proof has been presented, only opinions.

Best Democrat go too in today's political climate. The proof is knocking everyone down while the Democrat's holding or trying to hold power say nahh uhhhhh there's no proof. Pffft... Pathetic.

 

[Delldude]

There is no evidence that it was deliberate, there was no denial, there was immediate notification to the responsible officials, and there was immediate return of documents.

Your boy denied and lied, hid documents, and had to be "raided" lawfully to get them back.

He may be in detention by Tuesday night.

Biden had SCIF level doc's amongst his 'treasures'. They aren't to leave a SCIF facility. SCIF doc's were found in the Penn-Biden Center, in an unlocked storage room that anyone could have entered.......frequented by Chinese.
No one seems to be interested in how Biden had all these different levels of classified doc's in his possession.
Hate to break it to you, Johnny, but the Biden issue is more serious than the Trump issue.
If here was no evidence that Biden's moves were deliberate, how did the doc's get there then?

 

[Delldude]

Heard this several weeks ago and now, here it is again:

 

[Delldude]