Republicans, is CO2 a Greenhouse gas???

[Wyatt earp]

WTF? We are not the ones who want to give up oil and run around half naked and live in huts...that would be you, unless you're so Damn ignorant you don't know where plastics come from.

You're a dumb idiot if you think giving up oil means you have to run around half naked living in "huts".

Less than 0.01% of Oil is used to make plastics.

Have a link?

Of course not little lying ignorant dumb fuck AGW cult moron, a mere 46% of oil is used to make gasoline

Most Oil Isn’t Used To Make Gas, Here’s What The Rest Does

Gasoline isn't the only fuel you retard.

So again fuck head you want us to run around half naked and live in huts

With:

No medicine
Ugly ass girls with no cosmetics
No plastics
Using whale oil for lubrication
No paint

Etc..etc..

Fuck you and wanting us to live in the dark ages.

Medicine, cosmetics, plastics, paints are NOT contributing to Global Warming.

DUHHHHH

Only burning Oil contributes.

So ol ignorant one you think now they can't convert plastics back into gasoline?

Try me fuck head because I already know the answer.

 

[Brambo]

You're a dumb idiot if you think giving up oil means you have to run around half naked living in "huts".

Less than 0.01% of Oil is used to make plastics.

Have a link?

Of course not little lying ignorant dumb fuck AGW cult moron, a mere 46% of oil is used to make gasoline

Most Oil Isn’t Used To Make Gas, Here’s What The Rest Does

Gasoline isn't the only fuel you retard.

So again fuck head you want us to run around half naked and live in huts

With:

No medicine
Ugly ass girls with no cosmetics
No plastics
Using whale oil for lubrication
No paint

Etc..etc..

Fuck you and wanting us to live in the dark ages.

Medicine, cosmetics, plastics, paints are NOT contributing to Global Warming.

DUHHHHH

Only burning Oil contributes.

So ol ignorant one you think now they can't convert plastics back into gasoline?

Try me fuck head because I already know the answer.

They don't HAVE to, we don't NEED to burn Oil.

 

[BlindBoo]

You're a dumb idiot if you think giving up oil means you have to run around half naked living in "huts".

Less than 0.01% of Oil is used to make plastics.

Have a link?

Of course not little lying ignorant dumb fuck AGW cult moron, a mere 46% of oil is used to make gasoline

Most Oil Isn’t Used To Make Gas, Here’s What The Rest Does

The other 54 percent of oil is used to make most over-the-counter medicines, various cleaning products, some rubber, tons of cosmetics, many lubricants and most of the world’s asphalt. Virtually all plastic, and every product made from or containing plastic, ultimately comes from oil. Out of every 42-gallon barrel of oil, 22.6 gallons is used to make products other than gasoline.

You skipped Diesel which proves you're a retard. How much of that 54 percent goes to making Diesel?

Or is Diesel suddenly gasoline?

How much of that oil goes to making other hydrocarbon fuels of which there are many?

Since your list is obviously horse shit, I suggest you find a new list.

Here you go.

Product Share of Total U.S. Petroleum Consumption
Gasoline 47%
Heating Oil/Diesel Fuel 20%
Jet Fuel (Kerosene) 8%
Propane/Propylene 6%
Natural Gas Liquids and Liquid Refinery Gases 6%
Still Gas 4%
Petrochemical Feedstocks 2%
Petroleum Coke 2%
Residual/Heavy Fuel Oil 2%
Asphalt and Road Oi 2%
Lubricants 1%
Miscellaneous Products 0.4%
Other Liquids 0.4%
Aviation Gasoline 0.1%
Special Naphthas 0.04%
Waxes 0.04%
Kerosene 0.02%

What Does One Barrel of Crude Oil Make - Gasbuddy Gas Prices

Your link is bullshit, aviation gas is kerosene.


.

Each type of crude oil is different but that is the general range of what in a barrel.

Source: EIA November 2013 Data

kerosine / jet fuel

 

[Wyatt earp]

Have a link?

Of course not little lying ignorant dumb fuck AGW cult moron, a mere 46% of oil is used to make gasoline

Most Oil Isn’t Used To Make Gas, Here’s What The Rest Does

The other 54 percent of oil is used to make most over-the-counter medicines, various cleaning products, some rubber, tons of cosmetics, many lubricants and most of the world’s asphalt. Virtually all plastic, and every product made from or containing plastic, ultimately comes from oil. Out of every 42-gallon barrel of oil, 22.6 gallons is used to make products other than gasoline.

You skipped Diesel which proves you're a retard. How much of that 54 percent goes to making Diesel?

Or is Diesel suddenly gasoline?

How much of that oil goes to making other hydrocarbon fuels of which there are many?

Since your list is obviously horse shit, I suggest you find a new list.

Here you go.

Product Share of Total U.S. Petroleum Consumption
Gasoline 47%
Heating Oil/Diesel Fuel 20%
Jet Fuel (Kerosene) 8%
Propane/Propylene 6%
Natural Gas Liquids and Liquid Refinery Gases 6%
Still Gas 4%
Petrochemical Feedstocks 2%
Petroleum Coke 2%
Residual/Heavy Fuel Oil 2%
Asphalt and Road Oi 2%
Lubricants 1%
Miscellaneous Products 0.4%
Other Liquids 0.4%
Aviation Gasoline 0.1%
Special Naphthas 0.04%
Waxes 0.04%
Kerosene 0.02%

What Does One Barrel of Crude Oil Make - Gasbuddy Gas Prices

Your link is bullshit, aviation gas is kerosene.


.

Bwahahahaha....Aviation Gasoline is NOT Jet Fuel (Kerosene) and there is a difference chemically.

You're a dumb idiot if you think giving up oil means you have to run around half naked living in "huts".

Less than 0.01% of Oil is used to make plastics.

Have a link?

Of course not little lying ignorant dumb fuck AGW cult moron, a mere 46% of oil is used to make gasoline

Most Oil Isn’t Used To Make Gas, Here’s What The Rest Does

The other 54 percent of oil is used to make most over-the-counter medicines, various cleaning products, some rubber, tons of cosmetics, many lubricants and most of the world’s asphalt. Virtually all plastic, and every product made from or containing plastic, ultimately comes from oil. Out of every 42-gallon barrel of oil, 22.6 gallons is used to make products other than gasoline.

You skipped Diesel which proves you're a retard. How much of that 54 percent goes to making Diesel?

Or is Diesel suddenly gasoline?

How much of that oil goes to making other hydrocarbon fuels of which there are many?

Since your list is obviously horse shit, I suggest you find a new list.

Here you go.

Product Share of Total U.S. Petroleum Consumption
Gasoline 47%
Heating Oil/Diesel Fuel 20%
Jet Fuel (Kerosene) 8%
Propane/Propylene 6%
Natural Gas Liquids and Liquid Refinery Gases 6%
Still Gas 4%
Petrochemical Feedstocks 2%
Petroleum Coke 2%
Residual/Heavy Fuel Oil 2%
Asphalt and Road Oi 2%
Lubricants 1%
Miscellaneous Products 0.4%
Other Liquids 0.4%
Aviation Gasoline 0.1%
Special Naphthas 0.04%
Waxes 0.04%
Kerosene 0.02%

What Does One Barrel of Crude Oil Make - Gasbuddy Gas Prices

But wait, Deplorable's stupid list said 54% of oil made non-gasoline products, implying non-burned products.

But now you tell me 91% of Oil is burned as fuel.

Republicans = liars.

Where the fuck did you come up with the 91% number asshole ? The same place you said plastics made up .01% out of your ass?

Again how the hell you going to get your electric cars to run more then 2 miles with out a charge just using wood, steel and whale oil?

Oh wait what are you going to make the battery case out of?

 

[Old Rocks]

The same amount as pure oxygen. CO2 is a building block of all life. Without CO2 everything dies.

Idiots always get carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide confused.

An excess of CO2 will kill you.

Deadly Lake Kills 1,746

Lake Nyos is a crater lake in northwest Cameroon. Formed by subterranean volcanic activity, crater lakes commonly have high levels of carbon dioxide. Under normal circumstances, these gases dissipate as the lake water turns over. But the unusually still Lake Nyos is different. Over hundreds of years its deep waters became a high-pressure storage unit, ever more loaded with gases. More than 5 gallons of carbon dioxide were dissolved in every gallon of water. Lake Nyos was a time bomb.

On Aug. 21, 1986, something in the lake went off. It is unknown what the trigger was—it may have been a landslide, small volcanic eruption, or even something as small as cold rain falling on an edge of the lake. Whatever the cause, the result was catastrophic. The lake literally exploded in what's known as a limnic eruption, sending a fountain of water over 300 feet into the air and creating a small tsunami. Hundreds of thousands of tons of carbon dioxide burst forth at 60 miles an hour, suffocating people up to 15 miles away. Of the 800 residents of nearby Nyos, six survived. In all, 1,746 people died and more than 3,500 livestock perished in a matter of minutes.

 

[Old Rocks]

Do Republicans even understand that CO2 is a greenhouse gas?

Do Republicans understand there are even worse Greenhouse gasses? Such as Sulfur Hexaflouride, a non-toxic gas that is 32,000x more potent than CO2?

Can you imagine what would happen to the Earth if a gas that traps 32,000x more heat in the atmosphere than CO2 were to escape our industries on the scale that we have released CO2?

Just think about what your idiotic lack of scientific understanding implies.

Indeed...

Time to outlaw breathing.

People don't even contribute a fraction to CO2 increase in the atmosphere that Power Plants are producing.

Actually as part of the carbon cycle living things don't contribute to the increase in CO2 concentrations.

Apparently to your progress of friends in the government they do, dang Cow farts

Are you ever going to say anything that shows any degree of thought? The issue is whether CO2 is a GHG. Many 'Conservatives' like you like to demonstrate their vast ignorance by claiming it is not.

 

[Old Rocks]

Hooray for green house gases. Can't imagine life without them.

So what if you have too much of them and the planet becomes unlivable for modern civilization?

Adapt or die. Canada we have our eyes on you and your temperate forest!

That is, if there is any of it left in another couple of decades. Fires that cover over a thousand square miles don't leave much.

 

[Old Rocks]

Do Republicans even understand that CO2 is a greenhouse gas?

Do Republicans understand there are even worse Greenhouse gasses? Such as Sulfur Hexaflouride, a non-toxic gas that is 32,000x more potent than CO2?

Can you imagine what would happen to the Earth if a gas that traps 32,000x more heat in the atmosphere than CO2 were to escape our industries on the scale that we have released CO2?

Just think about what your idiotic lack of scientific understanding implies.

Do you know what the #1 greenhouse gas is? I'll give you a hint: It's the main ingredient in your body. You know....aside from you being full of hot air.

I don't think you understand the basics of how CO2 contributes to Global Warming.

Is it a greenhouse gas or not?

No, demonstrably it is you who don't understand how CO2 does, or doesn't work as a GHG. Is it a GHG? Yes. Can it do all of the magical things you claim? No.

Let's see. CO2 is a GHG, but it does not warm the atmosphere. No wonder you support Trump.

 

[Old Rocks]

Do Republicans even understand that CO2 is a greenhouse gas?

Do Republicans understand there are even worse Greenhouse gasses? Such as Sulfur Hexaflouride, a non-toxic gas that is 32,000x more potent than CO2?

Can you imagine what would happen to the Earth if a gas that traps 32,000x more heat in the atmosphere than CO2 were to escape our industries on the scale that we have released CO2?

Just think about what your idiotic lack of scientific understanding implies.

Do you know what the #1 greenhouse gas is? I'll give you a hint: It's the main ingredient in your body. You know....aside from you being full of hot air.

I don't think you understand the basics of how CO2 contributes to Global Warming.

Is it a greenhouse gas or not?

No, demonstrably it is you who don't understand how CO2 does, or doesn't work as a GHG. Is it a GHG? Yes. Can it do all of the magical things you claim? No.

Actually yes it can do all the "magical" things. The science on that is settled.

Sorry you're retarded.

Ummmm, no. It can't. The "science" is not "settled" save in the minds of those who stand to profit from the legislation that they wish to ram down the throats of the middle class of the world. The facts are that there is ZERO empirical data to support the theory. ZERO. Some day, when you actually learn how to think for yourself feel free to come back and show us some empirical data that supports it.

And virtually every practicing scientist disagrees with you. All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Do Republicans even understand that CO2 is a greenhouse gas?

Do Republicans understand there are even worse Greenhouse gasses? Such as Sulfur Hexaflouride, a non-toxic gas that is 32,000x more potent than CO2?

Can you imagine what would happen to the Earth if a gas that traps 32,000x more heat in the atmosphere than CO2 were to escape our industries on the scale that we have released CO2?

Just think about what your idiotic lack of scientific understanding implies.

Indeed...

Time to outlaw breathing.

People don't even contribute a fraction to CO2 increase in the atmosphere that Power Plants are producing.

Actually as part of the carbon cycle living things don't contribute to the increase in CO2 concentrations.

Apparently to your progress of friends in the government they do, dang Cow farts

Are you ever going to say anything that shows any degree of thought? The issue is whether CO2 is a GHG. Many 'Conservatives' like you like to demonstrate their vast ignorance by claiming it is not.

Oh Jesus Christ old rocks the US government says electricity is defined as a fuel.

How the fuck can CO2 be deadly when we need it and you need something to make electricity?

 

[SwimExpert]

And virtually every practicing scientist disagrees with you. All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities.

Kinda like how virtually every scientist in every scientific society and major university used to say that fat was the devil?

50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat

 

[SSDD]

Do Republicans understand there are even worse Greenhouse gasses? Such as Sulfur Hexaflouride, a non-toxic gas that is 32,000x more potent than CO2?

What is 32,000 X 0? Zero is the pertinent number because zero is exactly how much heat CO2 traps in the atmosphere.

 

[SSDD]

And virtually every practicing scientist disagrees with you. All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities.

Kinda like how virtually every scientist in every scientific society and major university used to say that fat was the devil?

50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat

What warmers don't want to recognize is that in practically every young branch of science....the consensus has almost always been wrong.

 

[bripat9643]

Do you know what the #1 greenhouse gas is? I'll give you a hint: It's the main ingredient in your body. You know....aside from you being full of hot air.

I don't think you understand the basics of how CO2 contributes to Global Warming.

Is it a greenhouse gas or not?

No, demonstrably it is you who don't understand how CO2 does, or doesn't work as a GHG. Is it a GHG? Yes. Can it do all of the magical things you claim? No.

Actually yes it can do all the "magical" things. The science on that is settled.

Sorry you're retarded.

Ummmm, no. It can't. The "science" is not "settled" save in the minds of those who stand to profit from the legislation that they wish to ram down the throats of the middle class of the world. The facts are that there is ZERO empirical data to support the theory. ZERO. Some day, when you actually learn how to think for yourself feel free to come back and show us some empirical data that supports it.

And virtually every practicing scientist disagrees with you. All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities.

Appeal to authority, your favorite logical fallacy.

By "every practicing scientist" you mean every scientist on the government AGW payroll.

 

[Old Rocks]

Just think about what your idiotic lack of scientific understanding implies.

It implies reality..... I don't give a shit. The world isn't going anywhere in the few remaining years I have left, so why the hell would I care?

No reason for you to care. No reason for anyone to care for you. You are a rock, have no need of anyone, an island unto yourself. And a pitiful excuse for a human being.

 

[westwall]

Do you know what the #1 greenhouse gas is? I'll give you a hint: It's the main ingredient in your body. You know....aside from you being full of hot air.

I don't think you understand the basics of how CO2 contributes to Global Warming.

Is it a greenhouse gas or not?

No, demonstrably it is you who don't understand how CO2 does, or doesn't work as a GHG. Is it a GHG? Yes. Can it do all of the magical things you claim? No.

Actually yes it can do all the "magical" things. The science on that is settled.

Sorry you're retarded.

Ummmm, no. It can't. The "science" is not "settled" save in the minds of those who stand to profit from the legislation that they wish to ram down the throats of the middle class of the world. The facts are that there is ZERO empirical data to support the theory. ZERO. Some day, when you actually learn how to think for yourself feel free to come back and show us some empirical data that supports it.

And virtually every practicing scientist disagrees with you. All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities.

Let us know when logical fallacy's actually mean something. M'kay....

 

[Old Rocks]

Do Republicans even understand that CO2 is a greenhouse gas?

Do Republicans understand there are even worse Greenhouse gasses? Such as Sulfur Hexaflouride, a non-toxic gas that is 32,000x more potent than CO2?

Can you imagine what would happen to the Earth if a gas that traps 32,000x more heat in the atmosphere than CO2 were to escape our industries on the scale that we have released CO2?

Just think about what your idiotic lack of scientific understanding implies.

I thought CO2 was what humans exhaled as they breathed? Why is it a greenhouse gas? Do greenhouses use CO2? you should check that out.

jc, you have obviously checked out your brain. CO2 is a GHG because of it's absorption spectra.

 

[Old Rocks]

I don't think you understand the basics of how CO2 contributes to Global Warming.

Is it a greenhouse gas or not?

No, demonstrably it is you who don't understand how CO2 does, or doesn't work as a GHG. Is it a GHG? Yes. Can it do all of the magical things you claim? No.

Actually yes it can do all the "magical" things. The science on that is settled.

Sorry you're retarded.

Ummmm, no. It can't. The "science" is not "settled" save in the minds of those who stand to profit from the legislation that they wish to ram down the throats of the middle class of the world. The facts are that there is ZERO empirical data to support the theory. ZERO. Some day, when you actually learn how to think for yourself feel free to come back and show us some empirical data that supports it.

And virtually every practicing scientist disagrees with you. All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities.

Appeal to authority, your favorite logical fallacy.

By "every practicing scientist" you mean every scientist on the government AGW payroll.

Dumb ass. The whole of the AGU and the GSA state that AGW is real, and most of them do not work for the government.

 

[bripat9643]

No, demonstrably it is you who don't understand how CO2 does, or doesn't work as a GHG. Is it a GHG? Yes. Can it do all of the magical things you claim? No.

Actually yes it can do all the "magical" things. The science on that is settled.

Sorry you're retarded.

Ummmm, no. It can't. The "science" is not "settled" save in the minds of those who stand to profit from the legislation that they wish to ram down the throats of the middle class of the world. The facts are that there is ZERO empirical data to support the theory. ZERO. Some day, when you actually learn how to think for yourself feel free to come back and show us some empirical data that supports it.

And virtually every practicing scientist disagrees with you. All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities.

Appeal to authority, your favorite logical fallacy.

By "every practicing scientist" you mean every scientist on the government AGW payroll.

Dumb ass. The whole of the AGU and the GSA state that AGW is real, and most of them do not work for the government.

Every member says that? The GSA is a government agency, and I don't recall ever seeing a poll taken of the AGU on the issue.

 

[westwall]

No, demonstrably it is you who don't understand how CO2 does, or doesn't work as a GHG. Is it a GHG? Yes. Can it do all of the magical things you claim? No.

Actually yes it can do all the "magical" things. The science on that is settled.

Sorry you're retarded.

Ummmm, no. It can't. The "science" is not "settled" save in the minds of those who stand to profit from the legislation that they wish to ram down the throats of the middle class of the world. The facts are that there is ZERO empirical data to support the theory. ZERO. Some day, when you actually learn how to think for yourself feel free to come back and show us some empirical data that supports it.

And virtually every practicing scientist disagrees with you. All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities.

Appeal to authority, your favorite logical fallacy.

By "every practicing scientist" you mean every scientist on the government AGW payroll.

Dumb ass. The whole of the AGU and the GSA state that AGW is real, and most of them do not work for the government.

Bullshit. Their leadership only does. The general membership doesn't you lying sack of poo.


And what the hell would the General Services Administration have to say about it you 'tard.