Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #81
They dont want black people to vote because they vote the wrong way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, that's pretty much what I'm saying..
Deep...NOT! more like FAIL!
Well, I certainly can't top that argument.
Well presented my good sir, and might I say...touche!!!
SO, who are the disenfranchised by requiring ID?
People who don't have ID's.
People who don't normally carry their ID's with them.
People who might have been in a hurry that morning and left their wallet at home.
So irresponsible folks or folks who have yet to make it to the 20th century. What percent of pwoplw are we talking here?
People who don't have ID's.
People who don't normally carry their ID's with them.
People who might have been in a hurry that morning and left their wallet at home.
So irresponsible folks or folks who have yet to make it to the 20th century. What percent of pwoplw are we talking here?
Probably a greater percentage than people who are actualy committing fraud.
Again, how many valid voters are you willing to block to get the one guy who might be cheating?
Or is that the goal all along?
So irresponsible folks or folks who have yet to make it to the 20th century. What percent of pwoplw are we talking here?
Probably a greater percentage than people who are actualy committing fraud.
Again, how many valid voters are you willing to block to get the one guy who might be cheating?
Or is that the goal all along?
According to the law, a voter must have ID to be a valid voter.
Failure.
Yep, that's pretty much what I'm saying..
Deep...NOT! more like FAIL!
Well, I certainly can't top that argument.
Well presented my good sir, and might I say...touche!!!
most of you have good intentions when it comes to this voter fraud issue. I dont think many of you truly want to suppress any American voter.
However, In my eyes, I have to say this current push to require a voter ID is just silly. * * * *
And I'll say again that there is not ONE single coherent, rational, logical, honest or persuasive line of argument AGAINST voter I.D. laws.
Not one.
Even ONE bogus voter undermines the value of the votes of every other voter.
We need to make voter I.D. something that goes back further in the process. The REGISTRATION process should require clear and provable identification so that, later, when that registered voter goes to vote, election officials can determine quickly and accurately whether or not the person trying to vote IS that registered voter.
ANY opposition to this is just a plea for the "right" of manipulative scum bags to commit election fraud.
No. We need solid voter I.D. laws so that we are not confronted with questions about whether the President (ala Kennedy in 1960) had gotten elected based on the nefarious work of voter fraud -- even just in one city.
Probably a greater percentage than people who are actualy committing fraud.
Again, how many valid voters are you willing to block to get the one guy who might be cheating?
Or is that the goal all along?
According to the law, a voter must have ID to be a valid voter.
Failure.
Not really, but keep telling yourself that.
Now go away, the grown ups are talking here.
most of you have good intentions when it comes to this voter fraud issue. I dont think many of you truly want to suppress any American voter.
However, In my eyes, I have to say this current push to require a voter ID is just silly. * * * *
And I'll say again that there is not ONE single coherent, rational, logical, honest or persuasive line of argument AGAINST voter I.D. laws.
Not one.
Even ONE bogus voter undermines the value of the votes of every other voter.
We need to make voter I.D. something that goes back further in the process. The REGISTRATION process should require clear and provable identification so that, later, when that registered voter goes to vote, election officials can determine quickly and accurately whether or not the person trying to vote IS that registered voter.
ANY opposition to this is just a plea for the "right" of manipulative scum bags to commit election fraud.
No. We need solid voter I.D. laws so that we are not confronted with questions about whether the President (ala Kennedy in 1960) had gotten elected based on the nefarious work of voter fraud -- even just in one city.
Why go to the expense, and inconvenience so many people - to the point of disenfranchising a large number - when there is no justifiable reason.
If the incidence of fraud is already so low, do you think that an ID system will lower it much more?
Furthermore, the stated intention of the ID law in one state at least is sinister.
Deep...NOT! more like FAIL!
Well, I certainly can't top that argument.
Well presented my good sir, and might I say...touche!!!
Should a 5 year old be able to cast a vote that decides an election?
Well, I certainly can't top that argument.
Well presented my good sir, and might I say...touche!!!
Should a 5 year old be able to cast a vote that decides an election?
I think you've got a couple of years before you have to worry about that.
To quote you back..."LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL"
Small town, tight local elections.
Supporters for one candidate decide to go to the local orphanage and pay each of the 9 year olds $10 to hop in the van and come down to the voting booth and support their candidate.
Should these voters be 'disenfranchised'?
Deep...NOT! more like FAIL!
Well, I certainly can't top that argument.
Well presented my good sir, and might I say...touche!!!
"Well, I certainly can't top that argument."
That's painfully obvious.
most of you have good intentions when it comes to this voter fraud issue. I dont think many of you truly want to suppress any American voter.
However, In my eyes, I have to say this current push to require a voter ID is just silly. * * * *
And I'll say again that there is not ONE single coherent, rational, logical, honest or persuasive line of argument AGAINST voter I.D. laws.
Not one.
Even ONE bogus voter undermines the value of the votes of every other voter.
We need to make voter I.D. something that goes back further in the process. The REGISTRATION process should require clear and provable identification so that, later, when that registered voter goes to vote, election officials can determine quickly and accurately whether or not the person trying to vote IS that registered voter.
ANY opposition to this is just a plea for the "right" of manipulative scum bags to commit election fraud.
No. We need solid voter I.D. laws so that we are not confronted with questions about whether the President (ala Kennedy in 1960) had gotten elected based on the nefarious work of voter fraud -- even just in one city.
Why go to the expense, and inconvenience so many people - to the point of disenfranchising a large number - when there is no justifiable reason.
If the incidence of fraud is already so low, do you think that an ID system will lower it much more?
Furthermore, the stated intention of the ID law in one state at least is sinister.
Small town, tight local elections.
Supporters for one candidate decide to go to the local orphanage and pay each of the 9 year olds $10 to hop in the van and come down to the voting booth and support their candidate.
Should these voters be 'disenfranchised'?
DId anyone ever explain the notion of "common sense" to you?
Well, I certainly can't top that argument.
Well presented my good sir, and might I say...touche!!!
"Well, I certainly can't top that argument."
That's painfully obvious.
you cant even top a goat goatless boy
Should a 5 year old be able to cast a vote that decides an election?
I think you've got a couple of years before you have to worry about that.
To quote you back..."LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL"
Should a 15 year old be permitted to vote?
Why are you ducking the simple, direct question?