ScreamingEagle
Gold Member
- Jul 5, 2004
- 13,399
- 1,706
- 245
Yes, Democrats have a pretty darn sleazy history. Plus you got Bubba as your Big Star of the "Oral Orifice" who is now pushing for position of First Gentleman…now there's a laugh. She ain't no lady and he ain't no gentleman. No telling how many more "gates" and "guests" we'd have at the White House if they got reelected.DeadCanDance said:
You don't want Craig to resign because you "feel sorry" for him? So this is due to your liberal compassion and liberal sentimentality? You are darn right, that's the difference between us. That's why you are a neocom patsy and I'm a conservative. The guy broke the law. He even admitted guilt. Then he backpedaled. This guy is a U.S. Senator. That is not the kind of "mistake" I want to see a U.S. Senator make. It shows a serious lack of character and proves he is too stupid to stay in office. I'm glad that the Republican party has pressured him into resignation. We conservatives have no desire to have that kind of person represent us.DeadCanDance said:
Glad that you agree that Studds acted like a pervert. 99% of the House agreed too. There is hope for you yet.jillian said:
What defamatory statement? That Studds sodomized a minor? Hey, he even admitted as much - that he was having an affair with a teenager, a 17yo boy under the legal age of 18, which is by definition is a minor. I suppose that fact upsets you, but it is true. Maybe they met by toe tapping in a capital hill bathroom…?jillian said:
You don't want to respond to my claim that liberals support perverts because you are a liberal who doesn't want to support perverts, but by extension, you are supporting them.jillian said:
First, I know Craig is a hypocrite - in my world. However, in your liberal and pro-homosexual world, your reasoning behind calling him a hypocrite is based solely upon political purpose. You found out he is a homo who is against the political homo agenda. Thus Craig's homo behavior is not worth defending. Where did your "tolerance" for differences disappear to? Obviously liberals demand that a homo fall into fascistic lockstep with their political agenda or else they are dead meat.jillian said:
Yes, in most cases. Let's not change the subject. The Left won't be happy until society is twisted enough to encompass their agenda. By the time that happens the Left won't give a damn anymore about homos because it will have attained its total control of society - which is the real goal. It's sentimental fools like you who have fallen for their sob stories who wind up promoting their agenda - which is to destroy our Christian American society and institute their godless society that bows only to the State.jillian said:
Quit your whiny, self-righteousness blathering - like I said before, if you would read post #299 you will see I only got your elected known perverts mixed up, as if it mattered. It was not Frank (as far as we know) who sodomized a minor - it was Studds. Studds even admitted the affair. However, BOTH Studds and Frank are examples of outright Democratic support of perversion. Studds was re-elected 6 times. Frank was also re-elected after a House Ethics reprimand. Frank's boyfriend was conducting a prostitution ring right there in Frank's home. And if you think poor Frankie didn't have a clue - then he's too dumb to be an elected rep. Birds of a feather flock together. Either way his character (or lack thereof) should have got him ousted from office. Yet the Left is willing to overlook the obvious in pursuit of power.mattskramer said:
