Well....not yet.It is a bad reason. Fortunately, Jews have not been chased out of the United States. We need their high IQ power.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well....not yet.It is a bad reason. Fortunately, Jews have not been chased out of the United States. We need their high IQ power.
I'll keep that in mind every time a Jew whines about the Holocaust.What happened to their ancestors in the past is not the reason for their low average intelligence now.
If anyone should apologize to American Negroes is the descendants of the African Negroes who enslaved them.
Slavery was widespread in sub Saharan Africa. Without the white slave trade they would have still been enslaved, and possibly eaten.I'll keep that in mind every time a Jew whines about the Holocaust.
They wouldn't have been enslaved if Europeans hadn't created a demand.
wow, sure, they were all eating each other. Why it's amazing there were any left.Slavery was widespread in sub Saharan Africa. Without the white slave trade they would have still been enslaved, and possibly eaten.
You mean other than they built this country?
Naw, no one has ever said, "Gee, I hope that Jew doesn't kick my ass".
I just don't do business with them. That helps.
America's initial wealth was built entirely on the trade of Cotton and Tobacco from EuropeHow did blacks build this country?
Be specific.
We have let in endless illegals creating sex slaves, labor slaves and child pedo slaves. Just saying.wow, sure, they were all eating each other. Why it's amazing there were any left.
Only in your imagination.We have let in endless illegals creating sex slaves, labor slaves and child pedo slaves. Just saying.
America's initial wealth was built entirely on the trade of Cotton and Tobacco from Europe
Okay, the north's wealth was from manufacturing.No, it wasn't. The cotton and tobacco wealth was confined to a few plantation owners in the South.
The Norths wealth was based on trade, and manufacturing.
You need to read a real history book.
Not the fantasy crap you have been reading.
Wow, you are clueless. The cotton was shipped to the textile mills in England. The tobacco was used everywhere, but it didn't get overseas unless there were Yankee ships taking it.Okay, the north's wealth was from manufacturing.
What where they manufacturing? Textiles.
What were textiles made of? Cotton.
Who was picking the cotton?
It was also shipped north. Point was, the North needed the south economically, which is why the fought so hard to keep them in the union.Wow, you are clueless. The cotton was shipped to the textile mills in England. The tobacco was used everywhere, but it didn't get overseas unless there were Yankee ships taking it.
Everything? Then why were we a net importer nation (and remained so until the beginning of WWI)The north manufactured EVERYTHING that the US needed.
Slavery was efficient, because you didn't have to pay them anything.And you are so stupid you think two crops that were never efficiently harvested till AFTER the slaves were replaced by machinery, somehow made America rich.
Was it the same reason that white people didn’t want to eat at the same lunch counters as black people?Nope.
There's a reason they've been chased out of every other country in the world.
Slavery was efficient, because you didn't have to pay them anything.
It was also shipped north. Point was, the North needed the south economically, which is why the fought so hard to keep them in the union.
Everything? Then why were we a net importer nation (and remained so until the beginning of WWI)
One of the south's legitimate complaints was that excises and tariffs (how the government funded itself before an income tax) were too high and benefited the North.
Slavery was efficient, because you didn't have to pay them anything.
You are a very dumb man.
Exactly. Neither tobacco nor cotton truly became profitable until after the slaves were replaced.They pretty much got what they paid for.
Low skilled, low productivity work.
Thats what I keep saying about the CIA flooding black neighborhoods with crack in the 1980’s. Black people are to blame for creating the crack epidemic.. They wouldn't have been enslaved if Europeans hadn't created a demand.
yes, the south was destroyed. People never consider the cost of wars when starting them.No, they didn't. The North DESTROYED the south, and it didn't matter a bit. The North continued expanding its wealth and then rebuilt the South after utterly destroying it.
Like I said, you are an ignorant moron.
Um, if it wasn't profitable, how could those rich plantation owners afford those big old mansions?Exactly. Neither tobacco nor cotton truly became profitable until after the slaves were replaced.
This clod has no clue.
yes, the south was destroyed. People never consider the cost of wars when starting them.
There's a reason why the North gave up on reconstruction relatively easily.