Rep. Paul Broun asked: 'Who Is Going To Shoot Obama?' Broun doesn't disagree

Really? That all you have? The semantics of my post? Sorry, professor, this isn't an English class. The question was asked. Do you agree with it? How do you feel about Braun's lack of condemnation?

OK let's look at the two statements together

Paul Braun was asked by a constituent, "Who is going to shoot Obama?".
Now do you see the difference?

Another professor weighs in. This isn't an English class. I may not be the best writer, but you know damn well what I meant. Is this really all you have? You can't condemn the question or Braun, but you can criticize the wording of my post. How do you people sleep at night?
Are you an idiot?

You are an idiot.

See the difference?
 
OK let's look at the two statements together



Now do you see the difference?

Another professor weighs in. This isn't an English class. I may not be the best writer, but you know damn well what I meant. Is this really all you have? You can't condemn the question or Braun, but you can criticize the wording of my post. How do you people sleep at night?

Which bit of calling it a 'stupid question' is too complicated for you to understand? No one is supporting anyone asking such a ridiculous question. We are saying that Braun handled it appropriately. He ignored it and make his point. Which happens to be against ObamaCare. Works for me.

Bearing in mind, he was not expecting the question... and bearing in mind that politicians are trained to 'handle' that type of question by ignoring it and sticking to their point, I think he handled it appropriately.

What should he have done? Given it credence by saying.... what exactly? 'No one is gonna shoot Obama'? 'I don't know who is going to shoot Obama'? Any answer he gave would have been stupid. He acted appropriately.

What answer could he have given? Really? Oh, I don't know. How about, "That's a really inappropriate question", "He is the POTUS. I'm disgusted that anybody would suggestion that he be shot", "This is the USA. If you're unhappy with the POTUS, vote against him, don't suggest that he be shot"
 
Another professor weighs in. This isn't an English class. I may not be the best writer, but you know damn well what I meant. Is this really all you have? You can't condemn the question or Braun, but you can criticize the wording of my post. How do you people sleep at night?

It's not an english class both have different meanings. Neither means the same.

Do you need me to hold your hand and walk you through the post? You know exactly what I meant. Maybe you should focus on the wording of the article. They spell it out nice and proper for you. ASSHOLE

One is asking a question
but your twist is making a statement.
Somebody says Obama should be shot and you can't even muster the balls to condemn it.
Paul Braun was asked by a constituent, "Who is going to shoot Obama?".
 
Another professor weighs in. This isn't an English class. I may not be the best writer, but you know damn well what I meant. Is this really all you have? You can't condemn the question or Braun, but you can criticize the wording of my post. How do you people sleep at night?

Which bit of calling it a 'stupid question' is too complicated for you to understand? No one is supporting anyone asking such a ridiculous question. We are saying that Braun handled it appropriately. He ignored it and make his point. Which happens to be against ObamaCare. Works for me.

Bearing in mind, he was not expecting the question... and bearing in mind that politicians are trained to 'handle' that type of question by ignoring it and sticking to their point, I think he handled it appropriately.

What should he have done? Given it credence by saying.... what exactly? 'No one is gonna shoot Obama'? 'I don't know who is going to shoot Obama'? Any answer he gave would have been stupid. He acted appropriately.

What answer could he have given? Really? Oh, I don't know. How about, "That's a really inappropriate question", "He is the POTUS. I'm disgusted that anybody would suggestion that he be shot", "This is the USA. If you're unhappy with the POTUS, vote against him, don't suggest that he be shot"

No body made a suggestion that he should be shot, so that would be a ridiculous answer. And the media would have spun that response to make it into a rant against Braun and why he answered a 'who' with a suggestion that Obama should be shot.

In fact, any response he would have given would have played straight into the left wing media's hands.... and apparently, ignoring the question is held against him as well.

Seems to me that it's more about hanging Braun than anything else. How pathetic.
 
Another professor weighs in. This isn't an English class. I may not be the best writer, but you know damn well what I meant. Is this really all you have? You can't condemn the question or Braun, but you can criticize the wording of my post. How do you people sleep at night?
Are you an idiot?

You are an idiot.

See the difference?

Edited. No Family Attacks!

Hyperbole much?

You making yourself look stupid now.
 
It's not an english class both have different meanings. Neither means the same.

Do you need me to hold your hand and walk you through the post? You know exactly what I meant. Maybe you should focus on the wording of the article. They spell it out nice and proper for you. ASSHOLE

One is asking a question
but your twist is making a statement.
Somebody says Obama should be shot and you can't even muster the balls to condemn it.
Paul Braun was asked by a constituent, "Who is going to shoot Obama?".

Like I said, this isn't English 101. Though, if you're having trouble understanding my post, you probably should take an English class. Now that you're done grading my writing, would you like to address the content?
 
Another professor weighs in. This isn't an English class. I may not be the best writer, but you know damn well what I meant. Is this really all you have? You can't condemn the question or Braun, but you can criticize the wording of my post. How do you people sleep at night?
Are you an idiot?

You are an idiot.

See the difference?

Edited
I could PM you my address so you could come over for a nice chat....
 
Another professor weighs in. This isn't an English class. I may not be the best writer, but you know damn well what I meant. Is this really all you have? You can't condemn the question or Braun, but you can criticize the wording of my post. How do you people sleep at night?
Are you an idiot?

You are an idiot.

See the difference?

Edited

FYI: You might want to check the T&Cs of the board..... No family, you fucking moron.
 
Which bit of calling it a 'stupid question' is too complicated for you to understand? No one is supporting anyone asking such a ridiculous question. We are saying that Braun handled it appropriately. He ignored it and make his point. Which happens to be against ObamaCare. Works for me.

Bearing in mind, he was not expecting the question... and bearing in mind that politicians are trained to 'handle' that type of question by ignoring it and sticking to their point, I think he handled it appropriately.

What should he have done? Given it credence by saying.... what exactly? 'No one is gonna shoot Obama'? 'I don't know who is going to shoot Obama'? Any answer he gave would have been stupid. He acted appropriately.

What answer could he have given? Really? Oh, I don't know. How about, "That's a really inappropriate question", "He is the POTUS. I'm disgusted that anybody would suggestion that he be shot", "This is the USA. If you're unhappy with the POTUS, vote against him, don't suggest that he be shot"

No body made a suggestion that he should be shot, so that would be a ridiculous answer. And the media would have spun that response to make it into a rant against Braun and why he answered a 'who' with a suggestion that Obama should be shot.

In fact, any response he would have given would have played straight into the left wing media's hands.... and apparently, ignoring the question is held against him as well.

Seems to me that it's more about hanging Braun than anything else. How pathetic.

I would have welcomed and praised a strong stand from Braun against the idiot who asked the question. It would have been a nice change from the usual Republican language calling Obama a socialist intent on destroying America.
 
What answer could he have given? Really? Oh, I don't know. How about, "That's a really inappropriate question", "He is the POTUS. I'm disgusted that anybody would suggestion that he be shot", "This is the USA. If you're unhappy with the POTUS, vote against him, don't suggest that he be shot"

No body made a suggestion that he should be shot, so that would be a ridiculous answer. And the media would have spun that response to make it into a rant against Braun and why he answered a 'who' with a suggestion that Obama should be shot.

In fact, any response he would have given would have played straight into the left wing media's hands.... and apparently, ignoring the question is held against him as well.

Seems to me that it's more about hanging Braun than anything else. How pathetic.

I would have welcomed and praised a strong stand from Braun against the idiot who asked the question. It would have been a nice change from the usual Republican language calling Obama a socialist intent on destroying America.

You might have... or you might have fallen in line with the left wing media spinning of why he even responded to such an outrageous question.

You're an idiot.
 
Georgia Rep. Paul Braun was asked by a constituent, "Who is going to shoot Obama?". Instead of condemning the constituent, Braun "ignored" the question and went on to discuss frustration with Obama in general.
...

The question was clearly in reference to taking a picture of Obama. There are even books written about how to shoot your kids:

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Camera-Ready-Shoot-Your-Kids/dp/0789301032]Amazon.com: Camera Ready: How to Shoot Your Kids (9780789301031): Arthur Elgort: Books[/ame]
 
I would have welcomed and praised a strong stand from Braun against the idiot who asked the question. It would have been a nice change from the usual Republican language calling Obama a socialist intent on destroying America.

You might have... or you might have fallen in line with the left wing media spinning of why he even responded to such an outrageous question.

You're an idiot.

Edited

Grow up, because right now.... you're not doing your credibility much good.
 

Forum List

Back
Top