Reduce the trade deficit; increase GDP & median wage
It is not our global trade but our trade deficits that are a significant net detriment to our economy. Annual trade deficits are ALWAYS an immediate detriment to their nations GDPs.
Im a proponent of a proposal to reduce USAs trade deficit of goods that was first introduced to the Senate in 2006.
The basic concept is exporters of USA goods may choose to have their goods assessed and to pay the federal assessment fees in order to acquire transferable Import Certificates; (ICs) which are issued only to exporters of USA goods for face amounts equivalent to the assessed valuation of their goods.
The fees are to defray the direct federal expenditures due to this trade policy; they are not a net federal revenue source. The exporters are motivated by transferable ICs value upon the open global market.
Importers of goods are required to surrender ICs with face values to cover the assessed values of the goods they want to bring into the USA.
Scarce and precious minerals are specifically listed. The value of such minerals integral to goods are excluded from all goods assessed values.
The purpose of this proposed trade policy is to eliminate USAs annual trade deficit of all assessed goods and significantly reduce or entirely eliminate USAs trade deficit. Additionally this policys an indirect but effective subsidy of USA exported goods. All of this would increase USAs GDP, numbers of jobs and median wage more than otherwise.
[Annual trade deficits are indirectly ALWAYS immediately detrimental to their nations GDP which in turn similarly affect numbers of jobs and median wage; annual trade surpluses have a direct and opposite (to deficits) effect upon their nations economy]
This policy would be of advantage to any USA enterprise that competes or aspires to compete with foreign goods within or beyond USAs borders. If we consider exporting and importing as a single global trade industry, then this proposal would then not be detrimental to any USA industry.
Wage and salary earning families benefit from cheaper imported goods but that doesnt compensate for trade deficits detriment to the GDP, numbers of jobs and median wage.
Google wikipedia, import certificates .
For further reference google wikipedia, balance of trade then refer to the paragraphs entitled Trade balances affects upon their nations GDP
espectfully, Supposn
It is not our global trade but our trade deficits that are a significant net detriment to our economy. Annual trade deficits are ALWAYS an immediate detriment to their nations GDPs.
Im a proponent of a proposal to reduce USAs trade deficit of goods that was first introduced to the Senate in 2006.
The basic concept is exporters of USA goods may choose to have their goods assessed and to pay the federal assessment fees in order to acquire transferable Import Certificates; (ICs) which are issued only to exporters of USA goods for face amounts equivalent to the assessed valuation of their goods.
The fees are to defray the direct federal expenditures due to this trade policy; they are not a net federal revenue source. The exporters are motivated by transferable ICs value upon the open global market.
Importers of goods are required to surrender ICs with face values to cover the assessed values of the goods they want to bring into the USA.
Scarce and precious minerals are specifically listed. The value of such minerals integral to goods are excluded from all goods assessed values.
The purpose of this proposed trade policy is to eliminate USAs annual trade deficit of all assessed goods and significantly reduce or entirely eliminate USAs trade deficit. Additionally this policys an indirect but effective subsidy of USA exported goods. All of this would increase USAs GDP, numbers of jobs and median wage more than otherwise.
[Annual trade deficits are indirectly ALWAYS immediately detrimental to their nations GDP which in turn similarly affect numbers of jobs and median wage; annual trade surpluses have a direct and opposite (to deficits) effect upon their nations economy]
This policy would be of advantage to any USA enterprise that competes or aspires to compete with foreign goods within or beyond USAs borders. If we consider exporting and importing as a single global trade industry, then this proposal would then not be detrimental to any USA industry.
Wage and salary earning families benefit from cheaper imported goods but that doesnt compensate for trade deficits detriment to the GDP, numbers of jobs and median wage.
Google wikipedia, import certificates .
For further reference google wikipedia, balance of trade then refer to the paragraphs entitled Trade balances affects upon their nations GDP
espectfully, Supposn