Workforce Since Obama became President
Workforce Since Democrats took over Congress
Workforce Since Democrats took over Congress
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Workforce Since Obama became President
Workforce Since Democrats took over Congress
One-third reduce long-term savings plans to make ends meet. A majority of American employees are finding themselves hard-pressed to live up to their household budgets, according to a new report from CareerBuilder. The survey of more than 4,400 full-time U.S. staffers found that 61 percent of respondents reported that they always or usually live paycheck to paycheck, an increase from 47 percent in 2008.
One-in-five workers (21 percent) polled said they are taking money from their long-term savings to satisfy financial burdens and have decreased their personal savings or 401(k) contributions over the last six months.
One-third of employees have forgone long-term savings plans. They have increased their savings each month (33 percent) and do not participate in 401(k)s, IRAs or other retirement plans (36 percent). Of those who did attempt to save, 30 percent saved $100 per month and 16 percent saved less than $50 per month.
61 Percent of Employees Live Paycheck to Paycheck
One-third reduce long-term savings plans to make ends meet. A majority of American employees are finding themselves hard-pressed to live up to their household budgets, according to a new report from CareerBuilder. The survey of more than 4,400 full-time U.S. staffers found that 61 percent of respondents reported that they always or usually live paycheck to paycheck, an increase from 47 percent in 2008.
One-in-five workers (21 percent) polled said they are taking money from their long-term savings to satisfy financial burdens and have decreased their personal savings or 401(k) contributions over the last six months.
One-third of employees have forgone long-term savings plans. They have increased their savings each month (33 percent) and do not participate in 401(k)s, IRAs or other retirement plans (36 percent). Of those who did attempt to save, 30 percent saved $100 per month and 16 percent saved less than $50 per month.
I don't think this is something we should be happy about.
I don't think this is something we should be happy about.
That all depends on whether you are the party in power or the party out of power. It's a sad fact in American politics that the party out of power will do practically anything to discredit those in power. If it requires taking action that will do harm to country so be it. There is nothing the Republican party would rather see than a big increase in unemployment, a double dip in the economy, even better. Anything that can be done that pushes the country in that direction is OK. When Democrats are out of power, they do the same thing as the Republicans.
Unfortunately, for so many politicians it's party first and country second. And we wonder why so many people don't even bother to vote.
I waited 35 years for that to happen. It never did. I left.I don't think this is something we should be happy about.
That all depends on whether you are the party in power or the party out of power. It's a sad fact in American politics that the party out of power will do practically anything to discredit those in power. If it requires taking action that will do harm to country so be it. There is nothing the Republican party would rather see than a big increase in unemployment, a double dip in the economy, even better. Anything that can be done that pushes the country in that direction is OK. When Democrats are out of power, they do the same thing as the Republicans.
Unfortunately, for so many politicians it's party first and country second. And we wonder why so many people don't even bother to vote.
That's why incumbents are not getting re-elected. People are tired of the lifelong politician who doesn't do jack except sit back and enjoy the good life while his people struggle. They don't care about us. Maybe come November we can get some people in there who actually care about us.
I don't think this is something we should be happy about.
That all depends on whether you are the party in power or the party out of power. It's a sad fact in American politics that the party out of power will do practically anything to discredit those in power. If it requires taking action that will do harm to country so be it. There is nothing the Republican party would rather see than a big increase in unemployment, a double dip in the economy, even better. Anything that can be done that pushes the country in that direction is OK. When Democrats are out of power, they do the same thing as the Republicans.
Unfortunately, for so many politicians it's party first and country second. And we wonder why so many people don't even bother to vote.
That's why incumbents are not getting re-elected. People are tired of the lifelong politician who doesn't do jack except sit back and enjoy the good life while his people struggle. They don't care about us. Maybe come November we can get some people in there who actually care about us.
I want to recover all that tax payer cash this President's wife just blew on her luxurious vacation in Spain. Lets start there. Yikes!
That shit does not bother me. What bothers me, even though I did not vote for him, his only accomplishment is healthcare.......
There was a day where corrked business was regulated by the people.
You screw over a customer, word gets out and no one buys from you.
That system worked.
Now, it is all about being a victim and restitution...and, of course, daddy fgovernment protecting you from making bad decisions.
"General Motors Co posted its biggest quarterly profit in six years on Thursday and CEO Ed Whitacre stepped aside on the cusp of an IPO expected to allow the U.S. government to relinquish its majority stake.
Whitacre, 68, who has served just eight months as chief executive of the top U.S. automaker, said he would resign on September 1, to be replaced by Dan Akerson.
Akerson, 61, was named to GM's board by the Obama administration a year ago when the automaker was restructured in bankruptcy with $50 billion of U.S. government funding.
Whitacre's departure had been expected, but the timing of his announcement caught even GM insiders off guard, just a day ahead of GM's expected filing for a landmark stock offering.
Whitacre, who continued to commute from his home in Texas during his stint as CEO of the Detroit-based company, had said repeatedly that he would be an interim leader.
"It was obvious that I was not going to be at GM for the long haul," Whitacre said at the end of a conference call to discuss the company's second-quarter earnings.
"We have put a strong foundation in place, so I am very comfortable with my timing."
Despite GM's recovery over the past year, analysts say it still faces a challenge in winning back consumers because of the lingering stigma from its bailout and the "Government Motors" label from critics."
By the way, you can continue to put all of those colors in your post but when you do I don't read them and I doubt many other people do either...
By the way, you can continue to put all of those colors in your post but when you do I don't read them and I doubt many other people do either...
Even if I would agree with him, I would still pass it up.
By the way, you can continue to put all of those colors in your post but when you do I don't read them and I doubt many other people do either...
Even if I would agree with him, I would still pass it up.How "conservative" of you!!!!
Even if I would agree with him, I would still pass it up.How "conservative" of you!!!!
How does me not wanting to read your posts because they are tacky and gotti even if I would have agreed make me conservative?
Neither party has had a good record of reducing spending.I waited 35 years for that to happen. It never did. I left.
That all depends on whether you are the party in power or the party out of power. It's a sad fact in American politics that the party out of power will do practically anything to discredit those in power. If it requires taking action that will do harm to country so be it. There is nothing the Republican party would rather see than a big increase in unemployment, a double dip in the economy, even better. Anything that can be done that pushes the country in that direction is OK. When Democrats are out of power, they do the same thing as the Republicans.
Unfortunately, for so many politicians it's party first and country second. And we wonder why so many people don't even bother to vote.
That's why incumbents are not getting re-elected. People are tired of the lifelong politician who doesn't do jack except sit back and enjoy the good life while his people struggle. They don't care about us. Maybe come November we can get some people in there who actually care about us.
I don't think this is something we should be happy about.
That all depends on whether you are the party in power or the party out of power. It's a sad fact in American politics that the party out of power will do practically anything to discredit those in power. If it requires taking action that will do harm to country so be it. There is nothing the Republican party would rather see than a big increase in unemployment, a double dip in the economy, even better. Anything that can be done that pushes the country in that direction is OK. When Democrats are out of power, they do the same thing as the Republicans.
Unfortunately, for so many politicians it's party first and country second. And we wonder why so many people don't even bother to vote.
That's why incumbents are not getting re-elected. People are tired of the lifelong politician who doesn't do jack except sit back and enjoy the good life while his people struggle.