Record -135.8 in Antarctica is Obviously Evidence of algore's Global Warming...

[itfitzme]

Cold dis-comfort: Antarctica set record of -135.8

Why wouldn't it be?...

Of course we all know that's why Liberals stopped using "Global Warming" and moved to the more Generic and almost Undeniable "Climate Change"...

Climate Change is a Constant... Not up for Debate.

But the Left is so Dishonest and so in Need of Punishment for the Wealth they enjoy in our Society that they will blame whatever "abnormal" weather is happening our Country's Wealth and Consumption.

We are not Hurting the Earth... And as a Country we are on a daily basis better about being clean than we were the day before.

But that's not enough for the Left... Nope... Because they don't want us being the best... It's not fair.

The "Global Warming/Man-Made Climate Change" Claims are a Lie... And what's Tragic is that most Liberals KNOW they are Lying.

That really Concerns me.



peace...

You don't understand the concept of "average". It is called "Global Warming" and "Climate Change", both of which are accurate.

Being stupid doesn't make things not true.

 

[ScienceRocks]

tornado outbreaks over the Midwest are caused by warm moist air coming out from the gulf of mexico(Atlantic) and cold air moving southeastward down the back side of the frontal system.

You aid more moisture to the atmosphere + more extreme storm system pump the cold air southwestward into it = more violent weather.

What is so hard to understand?

 

[mal]

Cold dis-comfort: Antarctica set record of -135.8

Why wouldn't it be?...

Of course we all know that's why Liberals stopped using "Global Warming" and moved to the more Generic and almost Undeniable "Climate Change"...

Climate Change is a Constant... Not up for Debate.

But the Left is so Dishonest and so in Need of Punishment for the Wealth they enjoy in our Society that they will blame whatever "abnormal" weather is happening our Country's Wealth and Consumption.

We are not Hurting the Earth... And as a Country we are on a daily basis better about being clean than we were the day before.

But that's not enough for the Left... Nope... Because they don't want us being the best... It's not fair.

The "Global Warming/Man-Made Climate Change" Claims are a Lie... And what's Tragic is that most Liberals KNOW they are Lying.

That really Concerns me.



peace...

You don't understand the concept of "average". It is called "Global Warming" and "Climate Change", both of which are accurate.

Being stupid doesn't make things not true.

You are a Tool if you Believe you have anything resembling reliable data even in the last 50 years... And 50 years is a fucking pin drop in the Galaxy compared to this Planet's Life and the "Climate Change" it has seen.

Arrogant Liberal Self Hating Fucks.

Why don't you all just Cobain yourselves and relieve the Planet of your Consumption and Carbon Footprint?...



peace...

 

[Wry Catcher]

Cold dis-comfort: Antarctica set record of -135.8

Why wouldn't it be?...

Of course we all know that's why Liberals stopped using "Global Warming" and moved to the more Generic and almost Undeniable "Climate Change"...

Climate Change is a Constant... Not up for Debate.

But the Left is so Dishonest and so in Need of Punishment for the Wealth they enjoy in our Society that they will blame whatever "abnormal" weather is happening our Country's Wealth and Consumption.

We are not Hurting the Earth... And as a Country we are on a daily basis better about being clean than we were the day before.

But that's not enough for the Left... Nope... Because they don't want us being the best... It's not fair.

The "Global Warming/Man-Made Climate Change" Claims are a Lie... And what's Tragic is that most Liberals KNOW they are Lying.

That really Concerns me.



peace...

Global warming of the Oceans impacts the climate in many ways. The title of this thread is at best disingenuous and an appeal to ignorance.

Oh my the far left talking points never stop.

Global warming is a natural process that happens any attempt to claim otherwise is not only dishonest but scientifically dishonest.

Huh? mmm...Thanks for Sharing.

 

[RDD_1210]

WTF??

Do you ever work with facts? Sheesh.

Facts? WOW! When you post one it will be monumental.

Here are some facts for you:

Climate scientist Dr. Murry Salby explains why man-made CO2 does not drive climate change

•CO2 lags temperature on both short [~1-2 year] and long [~1000 year] time scales
•The IPCC claim that "All of the increases [in CO2 concentrations since pre-industrial times] are caused by human activity" is impossible
•"Man-made emissions of CO2 are clearly not the source of atmospheric CO2 levels"
•Satellite observations show the highest levels of CO2 are present over non-industrialized regions, e.g. the Amazon, not over industrialized regions
•96% of CO2 emissions are from natural sources, only 4% is man-made
•Net global emissions from all sources correlate almost perfectly with short-term temperature changes [R2=.93] rather than man-made emissions
•Methane levels are also controlled by temperature, not man-made emissions
•Climate model predictions track only a single independent variable - CO2 - and disregard all the other, much more important independent variables including clouds and water vapor.
•The 1% of the global energy budget controlled by CO2 cannot wag the other 99%
•Climate models have been falsified by observations over the past 15+ years
•Climate models have no predictive value
•Feynman's quote "It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with the data, it’s wrong" applies to the theory of man-made global warming.

Where did you come up with this bullshit? Hang in echo chambers much?

This was maybe the best one from that list:

"Climate models have no predictive value"

Well, shit. No sense in applying science, then!

LOL

There's a reason he didn't provide a link to the source

 

[ScienceRocks]

probably from whats up with that ass.

 

[Kosh]

Climate scientist Dr. Murry Salby, Professor and Climate Chair at Macquarie University, Australia explains in a recent, highly-recommended lecture presented at Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany, why man-made CO2 is not the driver of atmospheric CO2 or climate change. Dr. Salby demonstrates:

CO2 lags temperature on both short [~1-2 year] and long [~1000 year] time scales
The IPCC claim that “All of the increases [in CO2 concentrations since pre-industrial times] are caused by human activity” is impossible
“Man-made emissions of CO2 are clearly not the source of atmospheric CO2 levels”

Satellite observations show the highest levels of CO2 are present over non-industrialized regions, e.g. the Amazon, not over industrialized regions
96% of CO2 emissions are from natural sources, only 4% is man-made
Net global emissions from all sources correlate almost perfectly with short-term temperature changes [R2=.93] rather than man-made emissions
Methane levels are also controlled by temperature, not man-made emissions
Climate model predictions track only a single independent variable – CO2 – and disregard all the other, much more important independent variables including clouds and water vapor.
The 1% of the global energy budget controlled by CO2 cannot wag the other 99%
Climate models have been falsified by observations over the past 15+ years
Climate models have no predictive value

These comments are on the web and you can find them on multiple sources, there is even a youtube video of this.

But that would require the AGW church to actually think beyond their programming.

 

[Kosh]

probably from whats up with that ass.

I am sure those comments are posted there and why would that change what the Climate scientist said?

 

[Abraham3]

FlaCalTenn recently argued with me that weather is driven by temperature differences, not absolute temperatures. Hmm.. Here we seem to have evidence that increasing absolute temperatures increase temperature differences. When it was -135 in Antarctica, it was 222F warmer where I live. Think that might waft a gentle zephyr or two? Think that might, on a fundamental basis, have something to do with the lovely weather we've been having over the last few weeks?

 

[skookerasbil]

Cold dis-comfort: Antarctica set record of -135.8

Why wouldn't it be?...

Of course we all know that's why Liberals stopped using "Global Warming" and moved to the more Generic and almost Undeniable "Climate Change"...

Climate Change is a Constant... Not up for Debate.

But the Left is so Dishonest and so in Need of Punishment for the Wealth they enjoy in our Society that they will blame whatever "abnormal" weather is happening our Country's Wealth and Consumption.

We are not Hurting the Earth... And as a Country we are on a daily basis better about being clean than we were the day before.

But that's not enough for the Left... Nope... Because they don't want us being the best... It's not fair.

The "Global Warming/Man-Made Climate Change" Claims are a Lie... And what's Tragic is that most Liberals KNOW they are Lying.

That really Concerns me.



peace...

You don't understand the concept of "average". It is called "Global Warming" and "Climate Change", both of which are accurate.

Being stupid doesn't make things not true.

yeah s0n......but nobody cares.



Id rather be stupid and be winning than smart and be losing.


The skeptics are winning ( there is an epic thread on it right here on this forum!! )

 

[mal]

Cold dis-comfort: Antarctica set record of -135.8

Why wouldn't it be?...

Of course we all know that's why Liberals stopped using "Global Warming" and moved to the more Generic and almost Undeniable "Climate Change"...

Climate Change is a Constant... Not up for Debate.

But the Left is so Dishonest and so in Need of Punishment for the Wealth they enjoy in our Society that they will blame whatever "abnormal" weather is happening our Country's Wealth and Consumption.

We are not Hurting the Earth... And as a Country we are on a daily basis better about being clean than we were the day before.

But that's not enough for the Left... Nope... Because they don't want us being the best... It's not fair.

The "Global Warming/Man-Made Climate Change" Claims are a Lie... And what's Tragic is that most Liberals KNOW they are Lying.

That really Concerns me.



peace...

You don't understand the concept of "average". It is called "Global Warming" and "Climate Change", both of which are accurate.

Being stupid doesn't make things not true.

You are a Tool if you Believe you have anything resembling reliable data even in the last 50 years... And 50 years is a fucking pin drop in the Galaxy compared to this Planet's Life and the "Climate Change" it has seen.

Arrogant Liberal Self Hating Fucks.

Why don't you all just Cobain yourselves and relieve the Planet of your Consumption and Carbon Footprint?...



peace...

Motherfuckers can't take issue with the Reality I have Illustrated...

Arrogant, Self-Destructive Liberal dbags.



peace...

 

[itfitzme]

You don't understand the concept of "average". It is called "Global Warming" and "Climate Change", both of which are accurate.

Being stupid doesn't make things not true.

You are a Tool if you Believe you have anything resembling reliable data even in the last 50 years... And 50 years is a fucking pin drop in the Galaxy compared to this Planet's Life and the "Climate Change" it has seen.

Arrogant Liberal Self Hating Fucks.

Why don't you all just Cobain yourselves and relieve the Planet of your Consumption and Carbon Footprint?...



peace...

Motherfuckers can't take issue with the Reality I have Illustrated...

Arrogant, Self-Destructive Liberal dbags.



peace...

Yeah, clearly you are incapable of actual objective and rational thought.

Objective evidence and scientific proof abounds.

Your subjective and meaningless biases, your complete lack of comprehension, doesn't mean anything.

Mindless prick.

 

[RollingThunder]

Climate scientist Dr. Murry Salby, Professor and Climate Chair at Macquarie University, Australia explains in a recent, highly-recommended lecture presented at Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany, why man-made CO2 is not the driver of atmospheric CO2 or climate change. Dr. Salby demonstrates:

CO2 lags temperature on both short [~1-2 year] and long [~1000 year] time scales
The IPCC claim that “All of the increases [in CO2 concentrations since pre-industrial times] are caused by human activity” is impossible
“Man-made emissions of CO2 are clearly not the source of atmospheric CO2 levels”

Satellite observations show the highest levels of CO2 are present over non-industrialized regions, e.g. the Amazon, not over industrialized regions
96% of CO2 emissions are from natural sources, only 4% is man-made
Net global emissions from all sources correlate almost perfectly with short-term temperature changes [R2=.93] rather than man-made emissions
Methane levels are also controlled by temperature, not man-made emissions
Climate model predictions track only a single independent variable – CO2 – and disregard all the other, much more important independent variables including clouds and water vapor.
The 1% of the global energy budget controlled by CO2 cannot wag the other 99%
Climate models have been falsified by observations over the past 15+ years
Climate models have no predictive value

These comments are on the web and you can find them on multiple sources, there is even a youtube video of this.

But that would require the AGW church to actually think beyond their programming.

ROTFLMAO.....you are one incredibly gullible retard, Klod. Do you think you can rustle up any sources denying AGW who aren't corrupt criminals?

Climate Sceptic Professor Sacked From Australian University Was Banned By National Science Foundation For "Deceptive Conduct"
2013-07-12
(excerpts)
A CLIMATE sceptic professor fired from his Australian university for alleged policy breaches had previously been banned for three years from accessing US taxpayer-funded science research money. Dr Murry Salby, sacked in May by Macquarie University in Sydney, was the subject of a long investigation by the US National Science Foundation. The investigation (pdf), which was finished in February 2009, concluded that over a period when Dr Salby was working at the University of Colorado, he had likely fabricated time sheets in relation to research paid for through NSF money.

We conclude that the Subject (Dr Salby) has engaged in a long-running course of deceptive conduct involving both his University and NSF. His conduct reflects a consistent willingness to violate rules and regulations, whether federal or local, for his personal benefit. This supports a finding that the Subject is not presently responsible, and we recommend that he be debarred for five years.​

The NSF reported in a bulletin on the investigation into Dr Salby:

Our investigation revealed that the subject (Dr Salby), consistently and over a period of many years, violated or disregarded various federal and NSF award administration requirements, violated university policies related to conflicts and outside compensation, and repeatedly misled both NSF and the university as to material facts about his outside companies and other matters relating to NSF awards.​

In relation to these companies, the investigation found:

After many years of operation of the first company, the subject created a second, for-profit company that acted as a subcontractor to the first company. The subject was the sole owner and employee of the second company, which existed solely to receive grant funds from the first company and pay them to the subject as salary.​

In relation to the time sheets, a report of the investigation said:

When we asked him (Dr Salby) to supply supporting documentation for the salary payments, the subject provided timesheets reflecting highly implausible work hours—for example, the subject claimed effort averaging nearly 14 hours a day for 98 continuous days between May and August 2002 (including weekends and holidays), and in other instances claimed to have devoted as much as 21 hours per day to the project.​

 

[skookerasbil]

Climate scientist Dr. Murry Salby, Professor and Climate Chair at Macquarie University, Australia explains in a recent, highly-recommended lecture presented at Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany, why man-made CO2 is not the driver of atmospheric CO2 or climate change. Dr. Salby demonstrates:

CO2 lags temperature on both short [~1-2 year] and long [~1000 year] time scales
The IPCC claim that “All of the increases [in CO2 concentrations since pre-industrial times] are caused by human activity” is impossible
“Man-made emissions of CO2 are clearly not the source of atmospheric CO2 levels”

Satellite observations show the highest levels of CO2 are present over non-industrialized regions, e.g. the Amazon, not over industrialized regions
96% of CO2 emissions are from natural sources, only 4% is man-made
Net global emissions from all sources correlate almost perfectly with short-term temperature changes [R2=.93] rather than man-made emissions
Methane levels are also controlled by temperature, not man-made emissions
Climate model predictions track only a single independent variable – CO2 – and disregard all the other, much more important independent variables including clouds and water vapor.
The 1% of the global energy budget controlled by CO2 cannot wag the other 99%
Climate models have been falsified by observations over the past 15+ years
Climate models have no predictive value

These comments are on the web and you can find them on multiple sources, there is even a youtube video of this.

But that would require the AGW church to actually think beyond their programming.

ROTFLMAO.....you are one incredibly gullible retard, Klod. Do you think you can rustle up any sources denying AGW who aren't corrupt criminals?

Climate Sceptic Professor Sacked From Australian University Was Banned By National Science Foundation For "Deceptive Conduct"
2013-07-12
(excerpts)
A CLIMATE sceptic professor fired from his Australian university for alleged policy breaches had previously been banned for three years from accessing US taxpayer-funded science research money. Dr Murry Salby, sacked in May by Macquarie University in Sydney, was the subject of a long investigation by the US National Science Foundation. The investigation (pdf), which was finished in February 2009, concluded that over a period when Dr Salby was working at the University of Colorado, he had likely fabricated time sheets in relation to research paid for through NSF money.

We conclude that the Subject (Dr Salby) has engaged in a long-running course of deceptive conduct involving both his University and NSF. His conduct reflects a consistent willingness to violate rules and regulations, whether federal or local, for his personal benefit. This supports a finding that the Subject is not presently responsible, and we recommend that he be debarred for five years.​

The NSF reported in a bulletin on the investigation into Dr Salby:

Our investigation revealed that the subject (Dr Salby), consistently and over a period of many years, violated or disregarded various federal and NSF award administration requirements, violated university policies related to conflicts and outside compensation, and repeatedly misled both NSF and the university as to material facts about his outside companies and other matters relating to NSF awards.​

In relation to these companies, the investigation found:

After many years of operation of the first company, the subject created a second, for-profit company that acted as a subcontractor to the first company. The subject was the sole owner and employee of the second company, which existed solely to receive grant funds from the first company and pay them to the subject as salary.​

In relation to the time sheets, a report of the investigation said:

When we asked him (Dr Salby) to supply supporting documentation for the salary payments, the subject provided timesheets reflecting highly implausible work hours—for example, the subject claimed effort averaging nearly 14 hours a day for 98 continuous days between May and August 2002 (including weekends and holidays), and in other instances claimed to have devoted as much as 21 hours per day to the project.​

Rare snow storm blankets Jerusalem - The Washington Post

 

[Abraham3]

WEATHER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLIMATE

WEATHER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLIMATE

WEATHER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLIMATE

WEATHER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLIMATE

and so forth

 

[Mad_Cabbie]

CO2 as a gas is a greenhouse gas. That has been proven with certainty. Greenhouse gasses absorb energy in the infrared wavelengths. That has been proven with certainty. Empirically, then, one could conclude that an increase in greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere corresponds with an increase in infrared absorbtion.

Tell me to stop if I've lost you yet . . .

An increase in the amount of absorbed IR radiation results in an increase in the mean temperature OVER THAT WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE HAVE BEEN EXPECTED.

Get it, yet? If not, I recommend that you steer clear of science.

I disagree with this being the main driver behind global warming, but thank you for your well reasoned argument.

 

[mamooth]

Those who can discuss the science, do.

Those who can't, cry about politicians like Gore.

Gore Derangement Syndrome is a sure sign you're dealing with brainwashed political cultists. Such as every denialist on this thread, all of them self-lobotomized by GDS. Their political cult has ordered them to rant about Al Gore, so they obey. That's probably for the best, given they suck so hard at the science. It must be rough for them, having the whole planet constantly laughing at them.

Now, that new low? Like the article said, it's most likely not a new low. We've just started using satellites to constantly measure temperature in spots in Antarctica that haven't been measured before. You'd think the denialist cultists would bother reading their own links, but then, if they could do more than parrot blindly, they wouldn't have gotten sucked into the denialist cult.