Rat Voters Suddenly UNregistering....How Come?

[depotoo]

U.S. judge allows Trump election commission to seek voting data
Judge rules in favor of Trump

 

[jc456]

Everybody on the left laughed and laughed about President Trump claim there were millions of bogus votes cast for Clinton. His new commission was told by the coastal states, and even a few in Dixie, that he could kick rocks. There would be no voter records turned over to the Feds. But the majority of states agreed to see if their voters rolls were legit. Turns out some folks aren't waiting for the knock on the door from the men in a black sedan. Already, over 3,000 Colorado voters have unregistered from the democrap party....wonder why? Surely it isn't ideological....progs don't turn normal that fast so it must be something else....I wonder what it could be?

DNC worried about voters unregistering in Colorado

They obviously didn't tell you that Republicans were also unregistering in Colorado--and it's because of Trump's voter fraud commission. It's not anything to do with voter fraud but everything to do with the state of Colorado sharing address's, birthday, social security numbers with Trump's bogus commission on voter fraud.

"Voters in some states are withdrawing their voting registration amid a request from President Trump’s voter fraud panel to collect voting data from all 50 states. Now a federal judge in Washington is looking into the suit filed against the panel’s request, by the Electronic Privacy Information Center The Washington Post reports that the judge will rule on the request for a temporary restraining order to stop the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity from collecting the data. Last week, the states were asked to upload info on voters that is publicly available to a federal site. That includes their names, address's, birth dates, party affiliations and last four digits of their social security numbers.

A majority of states are refusing to supply some or all of that information.
44 states won't give some voter info to panel - CNNPolitics.com

However, Colorado is one of the states that is adhering to the request."
Voters Unregistering in Response to Presidential Commission's Voter Info Request

so curious, who holds the records of social security information? state or feds? D'OH!

You think the feds give social security numbers out to every Tom, Dick, and Harry who asks for them?

they are handed out after birth, yep. every citizen is to have one. again, who do you think keeps those records?

 

[jc456]

U.S. judge allows Trump election commission to seek voting data
Judge rules in favor of Trump

Just as I stated.

 

[imawhosure]

Everybody on the left laughed and laughed about President Trump claim there were millions of bogus votes cast for Clinton. His new commission was told by the coastal states, and even a few in Dixie, that he could kick rocks. There would be no voter records turned over to the Feds. But the majority of states agreed to see if their voters rolls were legit. Turns out some folks aren't waiting for the knock on the door from the men in a black sedan. Already, over 3,000 Colorado voters have unregistered from the democrap party....wonder why? Surely it isn't ideological....progs don't turn normal that fast so it must be something else....I wonder what it could be?

DNC worried about voters unregistering in Colorado

1. What makes Democrats think that Republicans won't get busted for voter fraud instead of them?

2. Shouldn't all Americans from either party want to insure THEIR vote means as much as it possibly can if the other side has irregularities?

3. People should "Google " I want to buy voter information. There are firms that sell it in virtually every state. Maybe you should ask how they got it!

4. Why are the Democrats always insisting it is only THEIR voters who would be hurt by voter ID? Do they know who everyone voted for, and if so, how?

5. If Russia hacked the election, wouldn't this help prove the Democratic case?

 

[jc456]

Everybody on the left laughed and laughed about President Trump claim there were millions of bogus votes cast for Clinton. His new commission was told by the coastal states, and even a few in Dixie, that he could kick rocks. There would be no voter records turned over to the Feds. But the majority of states agreed to see if their voters rolls were legit. Turns out some folks aren't waiting for the knock on the door from the men in a black sedan. Already, over 3,000 Colorado voters have unregistered from the democrap party....wonder why? Surely it isn't ideological....progs don't turn normal that fast so it must be something else....I wonder what it could be?

DNC worried about voters unregistering in Colorado

1. What makes Democrats think that Republicans won't get busted for voter fraud instead of them?

2. Shouldn't all Americans from either party want to insure THEIR vote means as much as it possibly can if the other side has irregularities?

3. People should "Google " I want to buy voter information. There are firms that sell it in virtually every state. Maybe you should ask how they got it!

4. Why are the Democrats always insisting it is only THEIR voters who would be hurt by voter ID? Do they know who everyone voted for, and if so, how?

5. If Russia hacked the election, wouldn't this help prove the Democratic case?

ahhh see, you're thinking and you're thinking logically. that isn't a characteristic of a leftist. Nor their leftist justice system.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

4. Why are the Democrats always insisting it is only THEIR voters who would be hurt by voter ID? Do they know who everyone voted for, and if so, how?

It's just an excuse. Many Democrats are lazy and don't take voting seriously. Sure, they will vote if it's convenient; if somebody will drive them to the poll, if they stay open late at night when they wake up, if the polls stay open for a week instead of just one day. But to put any real effort into voting, they won't do it.

That's why they run around town trying to register Democrats to vote, or pull hobo's off of train tracks.

Voter-ID requires some effort. You have to physically go to certain places to get an ID, and that's just too much work for them, and the Democrat politicians know this. Of course, they can't tell you the truth, Democrats seldom do, so they make up some nonsense about race or the elderly instead and the puppets buy it.

 

[ColonelAngus]

It's not because THEY did anything illegal; it is because Trump is violating our personal privacy in the voting booth. And he can go fuck himself.

Libs have the same attitude about registered gun owners, right?

 

[JQPublic1]

There are many states where Dems with change to vot in the Rep primary, then switch back, and vice versa. The fact people are making a big deal out of this makes me think they don't want to get to bottom of how many have illegally voted. Unless, there is a conspiracy he's gonna send someone to your door if you are registered with the wrong party....

Right. Just how we registered, Democrat, Republican, Unaffiliated or whatever else. Whether a voter voted in a primary in some states would also tell who they are registered with, since in some states, you must be a member of the party in order to vote in the primary.

We have to look at what precipitated these allegations of voter fraud.
All I have seen in that regard is Trump's wild fanciful allegations based on nothing but lies. That's been no evidence of widespread voter fraud. In fact, it is a very, very rare event. Only a few people have ever been arrested and prosecuted for it. The bigger crime is cross-check. That nefarious program has disenfranchised thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of legal voters by purging them from the rolls. Frankly, I am puzzled by the Democrats silence on that issue. It is as if they sanction that diabolical republican initiative.

So how do you remove voters who moved out of state, passed away, or are too sickly to vote? Nobody is required to contact the voting commission when any of these things happen to a voter. So there is only one way to remove them, and that is purging.

Our state did it until some lib judge stopped us. They sent out three notices to people who haven't voted in over seven years. Those who did not reply were removed, those who did reply stayed on the voting roster. After the names were removed, some of those who were too lazy to return the postage paid reply complained about it.

You aren't familiar with Cross-Check I see. Cross- check is completely different from purging inactive voters from the rolls. Kobach designed X-check to target ethnic minorities, many of whom have the same names and, critically, most of whom vote democrat.
But it doesn't stop there. People registered to vote in two different states
are purged at the discretion of X-check operatives. During the last election only red states opted to implement X-check, all without any oversight or input by democrats. Under those circumstances
the purge would likely be biased besides being unconstitutional. Depriving qualified voters of their right to vote ought to be criminal . Amendment XV of the U.S. constitution is clear:
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
You may be surprised by what the ammendment actually portends. It does not guarantee the right to vote. Ammendment 15 merely prohibits preventing people from voting based on the list of things mentioned therein. Unfortunately, the GOP has made an art of walking the fine line between voter suppression and. Upholding the tenets of ammendment XV. As long as X-check has the appearance of being applied to everyone equally...there is no violation until someone proves bias.
Realistically, another ammendment is needed to emphatically guarantee the right to vote by all citizens. And that includes former inmates who are protected by the original Fifteenth Amendment and can not technically be discriminated against.despite their former servitude.
The Missing Right: A Constitutional Right to Vote

Okay, then let's give former felons guns as well. As it stands now, you can't own a firearm if you are a convicted felon, and the Constitution makes no mention of criminals when it come to guns.

Not all felons are violent. Ex felons in that status should be allowed to reclaim their gun rights to defend themselves and their families.. But the point is moot anyway because felons, violent or not, are going to get guns if they need them irregardless of what the law says.