Does that mean RWs can stop dismissing all these leaked stories solely because the sources were anonymous? That was the narrative all along right? The stories were bullshit because the sources were anonymous?
Well that doesn't hold up now that the comm director verified the stories to be true. If the stories were false, he could have easily assumed the sources could come from anywhere and wouldn't have threatened dismissal.
Scaramucci on WH leakers: "They're going to get fired"
Of course, if republicans were smart, they would know that these sources would remain anonymous to avoid retaliation. Duh. It's ALWAYS worked like that.
Well that doesn't hold up now that the comm director verified the stories to be true. If the stories were false, he could have easily assumed the sources could come from anywhere and wouldn't have threatened dismissal.
Scaramucci on WH leakers: "They're going to get fired"
Of course, if republicans were smart, they would know that these sources would remain anonymous to avoid retaliation. Duh. It's ALWAYS worked like that.