Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
She's not trying to be something she isn't, she's gay but still very cute.
Watching Fox now.
Hannity presenting a fair and balanced (lol) assessment of the allegations of quid pro quo in the Sestek matter, comparing the episode to Blogojevich and suggesting that the R's in Congress are asking for a Special Prosecutor.
Next Hannity and Frank Luntz (?) blame Obama for the consequences of the oil spill. Hannity claims Obama is doing nothing about the oil spill, is on vacation, playing golf and hanging out with Hollywood elites.
Luntz call the president "pathetic". Coming up the Gov. of Arizona and Newt Gringrich. I can't wait.
and irrelevant post................
irrelevant my ass. If any post is irrelevant, it was your posting the ratings statistics. The OP made a comment about the intelligence of Rachel Maddow... either your reply was irrelevant, or you did, in fact, believe that there was some direct correlation between ratings and the intelligence of the host.
fucking moron.
you can always tell when one of the k00ks gets publically humiliated!!!
real intelligent folks are a dime a dozen........but some of the most brilliant people in the world are bonafide oddballs AND tend to extreme's which is exactly why Maddow has so few viewers!! Her views are fringe and not embraced by vast segments of society!!
So what she's intelligent??!!!! Only far lefties think intelligence is everything!!!
She's pretty, you all are just saying she isn't because you hate her politics.
To me, she's comparable to Laura Ingram on the Right. Laura also seems edgy and assertive but she's a little smarter and classier than her female peers.
Now Ann Coulter looks like a man with long hair but she's even better than her little clone Michelle Malkin.
That's funny........ pretty isn't exactly the word I would use for her, here she is with her partner doing a Larry King impression.
Now Laura Ingram is actually attractive, then again, she actually embraces her sex rather than attempt to look like the opposite sex. She also has a brain that she uses.
First of all it's Rachel Not racheal.
Try spelling her name correctly before you praise her.
She has a research team that finds all her info for her
she then reads off a Teleprompter.
As they all do.
She and her president......
Ah yes, the willfully ignorant speak, all with one voice. Almost as if they echo each other. Independent thinkers, I think not.
She's pretty, you all are just saying she isn't because you hate her politics.
To me, she's comparable to Laura Ingram on the Right. Laura also seems edgy and assertive but she's a little smarter and classier than her female peers.
Now Ann Coulter looks like a man with long hair but she's even better than her little clone Michelle Malkin.
That's funny........ pretty isn't exactly the word I would use for her, here she is with her partner doing a Larry King impression.
Now Laura Ingram is actually attractive, then again, she actually embraces her sex rather than attempt to look like the opposite sex. She also has a brain that she uses.
She's pretty, you all are just saying she isn't because you hate her politics.
...
He's not too bad looking:
He kind of looks like one of my nephews.
Being a woman has nothing to do with what you wear and how much makeup you smear on your face.
I had an intimate dream about Maddow.
Does this make me gay?
Don't be silly. You're just a plain, ordinary, everyday jerk.
Wheewww... that's a relief!!!!
I have never had a dream about another dude before.
I knew a liberal would have a good answer to that question... noone is better at seperating people into groups... and I needed to know what group I fit into.
The Scoreboard: Thursday, May 27
By Chris Ariens on May 28, 2010 04:45 PM25-54 demographic: (L +SD)
Total day: FNC: 395 | CNN: 211 | MSNBC: 138 | HLN: 129
Prime: FNC: 700 | CNN: 246 | MSNBC: 239 | HLN: 225
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:
FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
503 343 428 873 629 596 531
CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: KingUSA: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
283 280 221 237 222 280 246
MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann: Maddow:
142 131 163 296 217 203 185
HLN Showbiz: Prime: Issues: Grace: Behar: Grace: Showbiz:
48 50 164 341 127 226 152
C'mon..........this is a joke right??? Look at the Maddow # ( highlighted in red)........and this is in the 25-54 demographic, so total rating is even going to be lower. The show barely has 1 million viewers/night and many nights falls under that and it is estimated that a vast majority of those viewers are committed liberal viewers. So........in other words..............
Nobody watches that show!!!!!
Notice how the defenders of Fox deny watching Fox and, rather than post examples why they don't watch Rachel, always attack her sexual orientation?
Bigotry, a Republican RW value.
Madow and Olberman are very bright and stick to the facts.
They come from a position and dont hide it.
Its allowed to have a position in America.
Fox pretends to be fair and balenced yet they obviously come from a position and pretend they dont.
They have been caught in lies and lies of ommition all the time.
Hell they fought in court for the "right" to lie to their viewers.
Notice how the defenders of Fox deny watching Fox and, rather than post examples why they don't watch Rachel, always attack her sexual orientation?
Bigotry, a Republican RW value.