8537
VIP Member
Exactly.Well, it may be a silly line of questioning, but I like to make sure I understand what folks are saying.
Thank you for answering. We are definitely on the same page, then.
I imagine I wouldn't be wrong in assuming that you are a fan of scientific integrity, as well, based on my understanding of your position?
Indeed. The original topic of this thread was the politicization of science (and journalism) and I believe the recent polarization in society is reflected in the journal process as well. The difference is that science can actually reach verifiable conclusions, and the politicization of science slows that process
....
Or prevents policy from not being adopted.- and prevents policy from being adopted.
Well this is no fun. At least call me a dimwit libtard grandma killer or sumthin.
This forum doesn't really lend itself to even-handed discussions of an academic nature, but I really would be interested in a discussion of steps that might be implemented to improve the peer-review process.
Last edited: