Osomir
VIP Member
Off in my history? I already specifically mentioned the slaughter of the Banu Qurayza prior to rosie even posting and called it a crime against humanity. Try again.
considering that which muhummad had to work with----himself and his band of merry men-----it was a MASSIVE GENOCIDE-------he did not have a NUKE
lol a massive genocide? You mean one which was arbitrated by a third party and carried out in accordance to the ruling which was conducted under Judaic law and not Islamic law? If that's the best that you can do then that's pretty weak supporting evidence on your part.
yeah right-----it was the PHARISEE approach------study a bit more
It was arbitrated based on the Torah. I have studied far more than you.
wrong---Muhummad insisted on his OWN version of torah. Study more ----he rejected rabbinic law and actually MOCKED IT as-------WUSSY. Recently the Iranians using muhummad's concept of TORAH-----popped an eyeball out of a
human--------jewish jurisprudence rejected mutilation more than 1000 years before the rapist pig was born
Muhammad wasn't the one handing down the sentence. The arbitrator was and he based it on the book of Deuteronomy and it was agreed to by the Banu Qurayza. so once again, the judgement was passed based on Jewish law stemming from the Torah. And once again, if that is the best you can do (and it is) then that is pretty weak.