Wuwei
Gold Member
- Apr 18, 2015
- 5,196
- 1,083
- 255
You and that trolling "flat-earth" type crap again. You have absolutely no other argument, and the only one you have believes in smart photons and defies observable, measurable, testable experiments in black body radiation.What you mean is that it means nothing in the context of unobservable, unmeasurable, untestable mathematical models...and if we were living in one of those models, I suppose you might have a point.. Out here in the real world however, where we can observe and measure energy movement it is paramount...You believe in models, I believe in reality...you are willing to ignore reality in favor of models that are untestable.
Your interpretation is a bunch of crap. The handbook did not say it was one way radiation. The flux is the net energy. Everybody understands that, except those who pretend it's not true because they like playing troll games.It does mention the temperature of the surroundings....it says explicitly that if the object is cooler than the array, that the energy flux is negative...that is energy is being lost by the array to the cooler object...and if the object is warmer than the array, then the energy flux is positive..that is, the array is gaining energy from the warmer object. How much more straight forward and plainly could they state what I have been saying all along?