Question of Canadian slaves

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by onecut39, Jul 3, 2012.

  1. onecut39
    Offline

    onecut39 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,523
    Thanks Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +150
    Cn we or can't we?


    Subject: Can I own Canadian Slaves?

    DEAR PRESIDENT BUSH: CAN I OWN CANADIAN SLAVES?
    Dear President Bush,

    Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from you and understand why you would propose and support a constitutional amendment banning same sex marriage. As you said, "in the eyes of God marriage is based between a man and a woman."

    I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination... End ofdebate.

    I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them:

    1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

    2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair pricefor her? She is 6 years old, healthy, and very smart. She doesn't want to bea slave, so that might be a problem.

    3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanness - Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do Itell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

    4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is, my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

    5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2.clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?

    6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination - Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination?

    7. Lev.21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear contact lenses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?

    8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though Lev. 19 expressly forbids this: How should they die?

    9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves? What should we do with the NFL?

    10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two differentcrops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

    I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

    Very Truly Yours,
    Ed Bigham
     
  2. vijay
    Offline

    vijay Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +0
    Most of this chapter will be taken from the book about the War of 1812. I have to deconstruct common and explain the significance, as it relates to our hegemony and cronyism or Synarchy survey. Officers in these times of war booty, the percentage of their subordinates. They are also often consistent with the enemy or each other, you can see in the movie Braveheart. There are many similar things in the modern war on the black market. This incentive to fight, one pair of our many. Britain has just experienced about 2000 slaves from Baltimore near the "runaways", is part of the labor in the Canadian Maritime provinces. As we have pointed out, the United States revelation experiments when the nobility see Britain's cousin was the release of their slaves in the United States.
     
  3. tinydancer
    Offline

    tinydancer Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2010
    Messages:
    41,539
    Thanks Received:
    9,373
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Sundown
    Ratings:
    +21,079

    Psssst. Hey poster!
    You need to be sending your letter to President Clinton as well . It was President Clinton who signed the Defense of Marriage Act.

    From his statement after he signed it.

    I have long opposed governmental recognition of same-gender marriages and this legislation is consistent with that position.

    The Act confirms the right of each state to determine its own policy with respect to same gender marriage and clarifies for purposes of federal law the operative meaning of the terms "marriage" and "spouse".


    President Clinton's statement on DOMA

    Bush believes in civil unions.

    Cheney believes in same sex marriages. His daughter just got married.
     
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2012
  4. onecut39
    Offline

    onecut39 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,523
    Thanks Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +150


    Gosh fellas this was a joke not a political or religious statement. Just a little spoof on the "infallible Bible".
     
  5. Barb
    Offline

    Barb Carpe Scrotum

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2009
    Messages:
    5,717
    Thanks Received:
    1,568
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    in a house.
    Ratings:
    +1,586
    I'm sure he didn't have much say in that. I know for sure he didn't do anything as veep to advocate her right to do so, either.

    Did he attend the wedding?

    Mighty white of him.
     

Share This Page