Question for all on this board

[charwin95]

Why do you think it's Constitutional for a sitting president to bribe a country into very publicly announcing an investigation of your political rivals?

Look at you, unable to answer the question.
As usual.

Hillary worked for the federal government and was under federal investigation while running for president.

So you take no issue with Biden being under investigation while running for President
Good.

Should Barr open an investigation into Biden (or anybody) solely because Trumpybear asked him? To look for some kind of general corruption?

OOohhh.. You think Trump had no reason to ask the Ukraine to look into Biden's actions
That's funny.

The answer is simply NO.

 

[Zorro!]

Intel officials want CIA's Gina Haspel to defend Ukraine whistleblower

You know..its the subtle demand that the power of the Deep State and media elites be acknowledged that is grating on people with a soul. We need to clean house and be done with their threats and "growing pressure". We beat them electorally but they dont think they are subject to electoral results. So out with them. And the media they rode in on.

From your link about "growing pressure".

"...pressure is building on the spy agency's director, Gina Haspel, to take a stand on the matter..."Intel officials want CIA's Gina Haspel to defend Ukraine whistleblower

"CIA personnel in particular are watching Haspel closely, since the whistleblower is one of their own...Some former officers have said that Haspel should resign if Trump names the whistleblower...[another cia agent who asked not to be named] said "it will create a very bad feeling in the building that will not be good for national security or you personally, Mr. President."...Former CIA Director John Brennan, a Trump critic and NBC News contributor, said intelligence leaders should be pushing back both publicly and privately...It will be incumbent on her to protect the whistleblower — and by extension, the organization — moving forward," Marc Polymeropoulos, a recently retired CIA officer..."

Well, Gina has other priorities now.

One America News reported,

"CIA Director Gina Haspel is the latest Intelligence official to reportedly be dragged into John Durham’s investigation of the Russia probe. On Friday, Politico reported Haspel may have information on former CIA Director John Brennan, who served under the Obama administration.​

And none of this "pressured to testify" crap with Durham. He seated a grand jury, he has subpoena power and he can compel testimony.

"That information could help Durham learn whether the CIA used unauthorized surveillance on 2016 Trump campaign officials.​

The CIA? Holy crap, we knew the FBI and DOJ did, but the CIA?

"Haspel has a controversial history of protecting the agency from political scrutiny and has rarely made public statements about ongoing intelligence matters."​

Our intelligence community spied not on Xi, Putin, or Kim Jong Un but on our own president.

That is sedition.

It's time for everyone to tell the truth about all this plotting against OUR President!​