Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There are lots of them. Do a search.That won't support your lack of a defendable argument.Failed English too, I see.
Where's your half-man - half-bird again? Actually, if the earth was 4 1/2 billion years old, the population would be more than the earth could hold. The population actually supports an earth age of 6,000 years.
people who don't believe in or understand science really shouldn't pontificate about it.
now let's pretend that the earth is 6,000 years old and dinosaurs existed with man.
While people who can't defend their beliefs should cast no stones at others. Where's your transitional specimen?
Science has repeatedly proved religion and there are many scientists who will admit it. Take Sir Isaac Newton for example.That won't support your lack of a defendable argument.
Where's your half-man - half-bird again? Actually, if the earth was 4 1/2 billion years old, the population would be more than the earth could hold. The population actually supports an earth age of 6,000 years.
people who don't believe in or understand science really shouldn't pontificate about it.
now let's pretend that the earth is 6,000 years old and dinosaurs existed with man.
While people who can't defend their beliefs should cast no stones at others. Where's your transitional specimen?
I don't have to defend science to a religious zealot. you should really stop putting religion and science on the same level. they are not comparable. the only "proof" you have of your beliefs is your belief. that's circular reasoning.
That won't support your lack of a defendable argument.Failed English too, I see.
Where's your half-man - half-bird again? Actually, if the earth was 4 1/2 billion years old, the population would be more than the earth could hold. The population actually supports an earth age of 6,000 years.
people who don't believe in or understand science really shouldn't pontificate about it.
now let's pretend that the earth is 6,000 years old and dinosaurs existed with man.
While people who can't defend their beliefs should cast no stones at others. Where's your transitional specimen?
I don't have to defend science to a religious zealot. you should really stop putting religion and science on the same level. they are not comparable. the only "proof" you have of your beliefs is your belief. that's circular reasoning.
From your link: "The Bible (Genesis 6–9) describes a worldwide flood (the Noachian Flood) covering even the highest mountains of the earth". So the bible describes a worldwide flood.Well no, the bible doesn't say that. Christians just don't know how to read, and Atheists are to caught up trolling Christians to consider the truth. Here's a point-by-point breakdown of what the bible says: Yes Noah s Flood May Have Happened But Not Over the Whole Earth NCSEThe bible says otherwise. Please try again.There was a flood but it was regional, not global, so asians and blacks were never endangered to begin with.If there was a flood and Noah didn't have any asians or blacks on his boat, where did all the asians and blacks come from?
Anyway, I think this is a bait thread so since I'm not your target audience a link to the truth is all I have to say about this topic.
There certainly is.There are lots of them. Do a search.That won't support your lack of a defendable argument.
Where's your half-man - half-bird again? Actually, if the earth was 4 1/2 billion years old, the population would be more than the earth could hold. The population actually supports an earth age of 6,000 years.
people who don't believe in or understand science really shouldn't pontificate about it.
now let's pretend that the earth is 6,000 years old and dinosaurs existed with man.
While people who can't defend their beliefs should cast no stones at others. Where's your transitional specimen?
There's not a single one even in the fossil record.
Actually, he didn't. It's irrelevant to your argument.Science has repeatedly proved religion and there are many scientists who will admit it. Take Sir Isaac Newton for example.Where's your half-man - half-bird again? Actually, if the earth was 4 1/2 billion years old, the population would be more than the earth could hold. The population actually supports an earth age of 6,000 years.
people who don't believe in or understand science really shouldn't pontificate about it.
now let's pretend that the earth is 6,000 years old and dinosaurs existed with man.
While people who can't defend their beliefs should cast no stones at others. Where's your transitional specimen?
I don't have to defend science to a religious zealot. you should really stop putting religion and science on the same level. they are not comparable. the only "proof" you have of your beliefs is your belief. that's circular reasoning.
Yes. Even Albert Einstein believed in intelligent design.
There certainly is.[/QUOTEThere are lots of them. Do a search.Where's your half-man - half-bird again? Actually, if the earth was 4 1/2 billion years old, the population would be more than the earth could hold. The population actually supports an earth age of 6,000 years.
people who don't believe in or understand science really shouldn't pontificate about it.
now let's pretend that the earth is 6,000 years old and dinosaurs existed with man.
While people who can't defend their beliefs should cast no stones at others. Where's your transitional specimen?
There's not a single one even in the fossil record.
Then it should be no problem for you to prove. PROVE IT.
Actually, he didn't. It's irrelevant to your argument.Science has repeatedly proved religion and there are many scientists who will admit it. Take Sir Isaac Newton for example.people who don't believe in or understand science really shouldn't pontificate about it.
now let's pretend that the earth is 6,000 years old and dinosaurs existed with man.
While people who can't defend their beliefs should cast no stones at others. Where's your transitional specimen?
I don't have to defend science to a religious zealot. you should really stop putting religion and science on the same level. they are not comparable. the only "proof" you have of your beliefs is your belief. that's circular reasoning.
Yes. Even Albert Einstein believed in intelligent design.
Paleontologists have already done that.There certainly is.There are lots of them. Do a search.people who don't believe in or understand science really shouldn't pontificate about it.
now let's pretend that the earth is 6,000 years old and dinosaurs existed with man.
While people who can't defend their beliefs should cast no stones at others. Where's your transitional specimen?
There's not a single one even in the fossil record.
Then it should be no problem for you to prove. PROVE IT.
You offered only a specious opinion.Actually, he didn't. It's irrelevant to your argument.Science has repeatedly proved religion and there are many scientists who will admit it. Take Sir Isaac Newton for example.While people who can't defend their beliefs should cast no stones at others. Where's your transitional specimen?
I don't have to defend science to a religious zealot. you should really stop putting religion and science on the same level. they are not comparable. the only "proof" you have of your beliefs is your belief. that's circular reasoning.
Yes. Even Albert Einstein believed in intelligent design.
Indeed he did. Why don't you back up anything you say? I know. You can't.
You quoted half of the first line from the introduction while ignoring that the article outlines Genesis not describing a global flood. I'm actually impressed, most don't even click the link to then deliberately misrepresent it as you just did.From your link: "The Bible (Genesis 6–9) describes a worldwide flood (the Noachian Flood) covering even the highest mountains of the earth". So the bible describes a worldwide flood.
????....given that this is the "Questions About Noah" thread, I suspect we all are......are you really as stupid as you look?......we aren't even discussing the biblical Adam and Eve.......we're discussing the flood and whether it would be scientifically possible for all of humanity to have descended from one woman since it occurred.......wtf.....you've never heard of mitochondrial eve?.......Do you have a link to a credible source?fine, be lazy......the last time I was asked the same question, my reply was "sorry...I don't have a date......nor do I need one.....however, I will point out that studies of DNA have shown that all humans currently in existence are the descendants of a single woman who lived sometime between 50k and 500k (likely 120k-150k) years ago.....that might be a likely target...."
will you consider Scientific American to be a credible source.....here's an article about DNA studies about both the genetic Adam and the genetic Eve....
Genetic Adam and Eve did not live too far apart in time Nature News Comment
You somehow missed it. The article is not referencing a literal A&E.
Take the time to read the articles you post. Otherwise, you make yourself look the ignorant boob you look like when you presume a literal A&E.
It's you, "angry fundie man", who is discussing the Flood tale.
drowning.......From your link: "this Adam was by no means the only man alive at his time." How do you explain this?wtf.....you've never heard of mitochondrial eve?.......Do you have a link to a credible source?fine, be lazy......the last time I was asked the same question, my reply was "sorry...I don't have a date......nor do I need one.....however, I will point out that studies of DNA have shown that all humans currently in existence are the descendants of a single woman who lived sometime between 50k and 500k (likely 120k-150k) years ago.....that might be a likely target...."So how long ago did it happen? You tell me.why would I admit I have no clue when I gave you a perfectly good answer the first time you asked.....its not my fault you don't read the threads you post in......
no you simple minded twit.....I do not think that 5000 years is enough time for people to evolve......I don't even think 5000 years is enough to get your head out of your ass and realize I don't believe it happened 5000 years ago.....
And if you're so sure that you answered the other question, post me a link, I have no idea what you're talking about.
will you consider Scientific American to be a credible source.....here's an article about DNA studies about both the genetic Adam and the genetic Eve....
Genetic Adam and Eve did not live too far apart in time Nature News Comment
????....given that this is the "Questions About Noah" thread, I suspect we all are......are you really as stupid as you look?......we aren't even discussing the biblical Adam and Eve.......we're discussing the flood and whether it would be scientifically possible for all of humanity to have descended from one woman since it occurred.......wtf.....you've never heard of mitochondrial eve?.......Do you have a link to a credible source?
will you consider Scientific American to be a credible source.....here's an article about DNA studies about both the genetic Adam and the genetic Eve....
Genetic Adam and Eve did not live too far apart in time Nature News Comment
You somehow missed it. The article is not referencing a literal A&E.
Take the time to read the articles you post. Otherwise, you make yourself look the ignorant boob you look like when you presume a literal A&E.
It's you, "angry fundie man", who is discussing the Flood tale.
Except for those who are not.????....given that this is the "Questions About Noah" thread, I suspect we all are......are you really as stupid as you look?......we aren't even discussing the biblical Adam and Eve.......we're discussing the flood and whether it would be scientifically possible for all of humanity to have descended from one woman since it occurred.......wtf.....you've never heard of mitochondrial eve?.......Do you have a link to a credible source?
will you consider Scientific American to be a credible source.....here's an article about DNA studies about both the genetic Adam and the genetic Eve....
Genetic Adam and Eve did not live too far apart in time Nature News Comment
You somehow missed it. The article is not referencing a literal A&E.
Take the time to read the articles you post. Otherwise, you make yourself look the ignorant boob you look like when you presume a literal A&E.
It's you, "angry fundie man", who is discussing the Flood tale.
So, per the fable, that would imply Noah made no effort to rescue helpless victims. Couldn't Noah have just made a bit more room on the Ark? Maybe double up some of the dinosaurs into economy class?drowning.......From your link: "this Adam was by no means the only man alive at his time." How do you explain this?wtf.....you've never heard of mitochondrial eve?.......Do you have a link to a credible source?fine, be lazy......the last time I was asked the same question, my reply was "sorry...I don't have a date......nor do I need one.....however, I will point out that studies of DNA have shown that all humans currently in existence are the descendants of a single woman who lived sometime between 50k and 500k (likely 120k-150k) years ago.....that might be a likely target...."So how long ago did it happen? You tell me.
And if you're so sure that you answered the other question, post me a link, I have no idea what you're talking about.
will you consider Scientific American to be a credible source.....here's an article about DNA studies about both the genetic Adam and the genetic Eve....
Genetic Adam and Eve did not live too far apart in time Nature News Comment
if you already knew the answer, why ask it?......the problem seems to be that you don't realize Christians have no problem recognizing that evolution explains why we have both yellow and blue butterflies and Swedes as well as Samoans.......the silly part comes in when you folks try to say that evolution means human beings and lemurs have a common ancestor.......(or that they WERE our ancestor)......Randy asked a question that he couldn't answer himself. Why do people look different? Without looking it up scientifically, I'd say that a) evolution, and b) some kinds of variables in each species genes? Is there another answer?obviously its the 'why' that's giving him the most trouble.....I see you are taking a while. To save you some time searching: Dictionary and Thesaurus - Merriam-Webster OnlineYou asked me to explain. What part do you not understand: 'people', 'different', 'races', 'look', 'different'? You want a link to a dictionary or something?You can't even explain your own answer?
/shrugs.....you should have read the story.....there were no helpless victims......So, per the fable, that would imply Noah made no effort to rescue helpless victims. Couldn't Noah have just made a bit more room on the Ark? Maybe double up some of the dinosaurs into economy class?drowning.......From your link: "this Adam was by no means the only man alive at his time." How do you explain this?wtf.....you've never heard of mitochondrial eve?.......Do you have a link to a credible source?fine, be lazy......the last time I was asked the same question, my reply was "sorry...I don't have a date......nor do I need one.....however, I will point out that studies of DNA have shown that all humans currently in existence are the descendants of a single woman who lived sometime between 50k and 500k (likely 120k-150k) years ago.....that might be a likely target...."
will you consider Scientific American to be a credible source.....here's an article about DNA studies about both the genetic Adam and the genetic Eve....
Genetic Adam and Eve did not live too far apart in time Nature News Comment
From your link: "The Bible (Genesis 6–9) describes a worldwide flood (the Noachian Flood) covering even the highest mountains of the earth". So the bible describes a worldwide flood.Well no, the bible doesn't say that. Christians just don't know how to read, and Atheists are to caught up trolling Christians to consider the truth. Here's a point-by-point breakdown of what the bible says: Yes Noah s Flood May Have Happened But Not Over the Whole Earth NCSEThe bible says otherwise. Please try again.There was a flood but it was regional, not global, so asians and blacks were never endangered to begin with.If there was a flood and Noah didn't have any asians or blacks on his boat, where did all the asians and blacks come from?
Anyway, I think this is a bait thread so since I'm not your target audience a link to the truth is all I have to say about this topic.
