Public Schools And The Decline Of Christianity In America - video

[holston]

Not exactly. They're tired of their children being indoctrinated by Marxists and resent being told what they may do by Jewish Supremacists.

And again - why do you link Judaism with Marxism when we know that not only is there no connection, but Jews were viciously oppressed by communists for the last 50 years of Soviet rule?

I'm chiefly concerned with what is happening NOW in the US.

But since you brought it up:

Stalin's Jews - Israel Opinion, Ynetnews

Stalin's Jews

We mustn't forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish

Published: 12.21.06, 23:35 / Israel Opinion

In his new, highly praised book "The War of the World, "Historian Niall Ferguson writes that no revolution in the history of mankind devoured its children with the same unrestrained appetite as did the Soviet revolution. In his book on the Stalinist purges, Tel Aviv University's Dr. Igal Halfin writes that Stalinist violence was unique in that it was directed internally.



Lenin, Stalin, and their successors could not have carried out their deeds without wide-scale cooperation of disciplined "terror officials," cruel interrogators, snitches, executioners, guards, judges, perverts, and many bleeding hearts who were members of the progressive Western Left and were deceived by the Soviet regime of horror and even provided it with a kosher certificate.

And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name "Genrikh Yagoda," the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the "bloodthirsty dwarf."



Yezhov was not Jewish but was blessed with an active Jewish wife. In his Book "Stalin: Court of the Red Star", Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore writes that during the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing machine worked in full force, Stalin was surrounded by beautiful, young Jewish women.



Stalin's close associates and loyalists included member of the Central Committee and Politburo Lazar Kaganovich. Montefiore characterizes him as the "first Stalinist" and adds that those starving to death in Ukraine, an unparalleled tragedy in the history of human kind aside from the Nazi horrors and Mao's terror in China, did not move Kaganovich.



Many Jews sold their soul to the devil of the Communist revolution and have blood on their hands for eternity. We'll mention just one more: Leonid Reichman, head of the NKVD's special department and the organization's chief interrogator, who was a particularly cruel sadist.



In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin. They too, of course, were gradually eliminated in the next purges. In a fascinating lecture at a Tel Aviv University convention this week, Dr. Halfin described the waves of soviet terror as a "carnival of mass murder," "fantasy of purges", and "essianism of evil." Turns out that Jews too, when they become captivated by messianic ideology, can become great murderers, among the greatest known by modern history.



The Jews active in official communist terror apparatuses (In the Soviet Union and abroad) and who at times led them, did not do this, obviously, as Jews, but rather, as Stalinists, communists, and "Soviet people." Therefore, we find it easy to ignore their origin and "play dumb": What do we have to do with them? But let's not forget them. My own view is different. I find it unacceptable that a person will be considered a member of the Jewish people when he does great things, but not considered part of our people when he does amazingly despicable things.



Even if we deny it, we cannot escape the Jewishness of "our hangmen," who served the Red Terror with loyalty and dedication from its establishment. After all, others will always remind us of their origin.

Why does none of this surprise me?

 

[Saigon]

Holston -

Why does what not surprise you?

That during 50 years of communist rule there was only a single Jew in a senior Soviet position?

That during those same years Muslim Tatars and Azeris outnumbered Jews in senior positions?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Christianity is in decline all over the western world, and it has nothing to do with schools.

Can anyone think of a single western country where Christianity is thriving?

It just seems to be a natural evolutionary shift that means younger people are less and less interested in religion.

I can see good and bad in that, but I see little point in blaming schools for it.

Exactly.

One has absolutely nothing to do with the other.

 

[Agit8r]

People can send their kids wherever they like, but there isn't any reason I should have to pay for them to pass on their peculiar beliefs.

"When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and, when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig'd to call for the help of the Civil Power, it is a sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one."
-- Benjamin Franklin; from letter to Richard Price (October 9, 1780)

 

[editec]

Believing in the virtue of selfishness is NOT a Christian way of life.

Thinking that property can have human rights is NOT a Christian belief, either.

If you think yourself a believer of the Christian philosphy, and you support either of the above?

You are not a Christian, you are a materialist.

And WHO runs the material world, according to the Christiian religion, folks?

Well for a hint, check out what Satan offered Jesus while he was in the wilderness.

 

[Agit8r]

There is a phrase in US law 'tyranny of the majority': religion being a matter of personal conscience, it is one area where a exception must be maintained to the 'majority rule' of democracy.

Actually, this "tyranny of the majority" that you speak of? The founders of the nation, and the framers of the constitution worked very hard on the constitution, that is why there are so many checks and balances, and why the nation was originally intended to be a republic, not a democracy.

Each and every one of the original ten amendments to the constitution was known as "The Bill of Rights." The amendments were meant to protect sovereign individuals from the will of the majority, whether the rest of the nation liked it or not.

Don't like what somebody else says? Too bad, if you are a patriotic American, you support their Right to speak. Don't like guns? Too bad, if you are patriotic American, you support their right to own any gun they like. Think they committed a crime? Well, you can't force them to testify against themselves and they need a quick fair trial. . . . (no lynchings. lol )

Anyway, one by one, we seem to becoming a more intolerant nation, unable or unwilling to listen to each other. But you are very correct, the tyranny of the majority does seem to be encroaching on every one. . . . If we don't like what someone has to say, we tell them to sit down and shut the fuck up, right?

This then is why we no longer have "Christian" public schools. However, tyranny of the majority still does reign in our schools. Because the majority of our citizens have elected representatives to our national government which have passed laws mandating that compulsory schooling is now the law of the land. Since the philosophical leaning of public schools is secular humanism, the tyranny of the majority violates the human rights of the average christian, or any person that has strong spiritual, moral or ethical beliefs based on an immortal soul. The government doesn't care about that though. Secular Humanism, if you study philosophy, stands opposed to the concept of an "immortal soul."

Why is this concept important? Because all of our fundamental rights, as posited by the empiricists, come from "natural rights," not from man. If governments gave the citizenry rights, they would not then be rights, would they? No indeed, they would be "privileges." And any government that can give citizens such so called "rights", can just as easily take them away, can't they? The empiricists posited this is not true if "rights" are natural, if they are endowed by a creator. They can unjustly be denied by tyrants, just as we can lock up animals and slaughter our livestock, but this does not make it "just." If we accept that there is moral injustice to killing, thieving, deception, than denial of natural rights to those who posses a consciousness endowed by creation, is also immoral. This then, is what will no longer be taught in schools of a secular humanist philosophy, but is the basis for the entire government of this once great nation. YOU TELL ME IF THIS MAKES SENSE?

Thirty years ago, if we had this forum, we would be discussing and arguing over issues of law and policy, but nearly everyone would be in agreement on the fundamentals of what it means to be an American, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution. Unfortunately, since the elites have taken the soul out of American schools and "conditioned" children to not know what their natural rights are, the Bill of Rights has been shredded, and now we have actual arguments that the government has a legitimate right to do this??! They have the right to change the fundamental structure of what it is to be an American? This is what happens when you take the soul out of humanity and god out of a child's education. Does it matter if that god is a "Jewish God" or a "Christian God" or a "Muslim God?" Not really. But, this is what happens when you force poor parents to have their children educated by a godless state, you get soulless zombie children whose only love is feeling good and mimicking what they see on TV.

What is the difference between humanism that relies on natural sentiments of mutual self-preservation endowed by a creator, and humanism that relies on natural sentiments of mutual self-preservation that are not endowed by a creator. It literally makes no difference to the protection of our natural rights.

"If we did a good act merely from the love of God and a belief that it is pleasing to Him, whence arises the morality of the Atheist? It is idle to say, as some do, that no such being exists... Diderot, D'Alembert, D'Holbach, Condorcet, are known to have been among the most virtuous of men. Their virtue, then, must have had some other foundation than the love of God."
-- Thomas Jefferson; from letter to Thomas Law (June 13, 1814)